Object Location Memory and Sex Difference: Implications on Static vs. Dynamic Navigation Environments

In the present study, the effect of a two-type multimedia navigationenvironment (dynamic vs. static) was investigated on recall performancesof learners with different object location memory (OLM) spans (low vs. high). The OLM spans of 34 male and female undergraduate students weredetermined by a revised location memory test, and the students were separatedinto high and low groups. In a 2x2 nested ANOVA design, one group studiedthe static navigation environment, while the other explored the 3-D dynamicenvironment. While in the 3-D dynamic environment individuals navigatedthrough the smooth display of view changes; in the static environment, 2-Drepresentation of the 3-D real world, objects did not change with the movementof the observer. As participants finished the navigation task, they were givena spatial knowledge recall test. Findings indicated that learners showed higherrecall performances in the static environment than the dynamic environment. Gender differences were also observed in terms of recalling spatial knowledge,with males earning the highest scores in the dynamic navigation environment.

[1]  Timothy A. Hays,et al.  Spatial Abilities and the Effects of Computer Animation on Short-Term and Long-Term Comprehension , 1996 .

[2]  Chiara Meneghetti,et al.  Working memory components and imagery instructions in the elaboration of a spatial mental model , 2007, Psychological research.

[3]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Spatial Working Memory , 2011 .

[4]  N. Neave,et al.  Sex differences in object location memory: Some further methodological considerations , 2006 .

[5]  D. Kimura Sex and cognition , 1999 .

[6]  M. Crossley,et al.  The female advantage in object location memory is robust to verbalizability and mode of presentation of test stimuli , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  I. Silverman,et al.  The Hunter-Gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays , 1994 .

[8]  S. Gaulin,et al.  Superior spatial memory of women: Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis , 1997 .

[9]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Visualization Training Approaches for Users with Different Spatial Abilities , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[10]  G. Alexander,et al.  Memory for face locations: Emotional processing alters spatial abilities , 2005 .

[11]  A. Postma,et al.  Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: A study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  Barry Harper,et al.  The Importance of Active Exploration, Optical Flow, and Task Alignment for Spatial Learning in Desktop 3D Environments , 2010, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in use of external visualisations to perform an internal visualisation task. , 2007 .

[14]  P. Wilson Active Exploration of a Virtual Environment Does Not Promote Orientation or Memory for Objects , 1999 .

[15]  Albert Postma,et al.  Sex Differences in Object Location Memory , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  T. Höffler Spatial Ability: Its Influence on Learning with Visualizations—a Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[17]  Thomas W. James,et al.  Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location-exchanges , 1997 .

[18]  P A Hancock,et al.  The perception of spatial layout in real and virtual worlds. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[19]  E. D. de Haan,et al.  What Was Where? Memory for Object Locations , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Goal Configurations and Processing Strategies as Moderators Between Instructional Design and Cognitive Load: Evidence From Hypertext-Based Instruction , 2003 .

[21]  Carolyn R. Watters,et al.  A comparative study of navigation using single vs. community driven tag clouds on websites , 2012, ASIST.

[22]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[23]  Augusto Gnisci,et al.  Gender differences in object location memory in a real three-dimensional environment , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  M. G. McGee Human spatial abilities: psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Julie Pallant,et al.  SPSS survival manual : a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows , 2001, Behaviour Change.

[26]  Sigrid Schmitz,et al.  Gender Differences in Acquisition of Environmental Knowledge Related to Wayfinding Behavior, Spatial Anxiety and Self-Estimated Environmental Competencies , 1999 .

[27]  Self-Concept Variables Sex Differences in , 2016 .

[28]  Harry R. Speiser,et al.  Spatio-temporal working-memory and short-term object-location tasks use different memory mechanisms. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[29]  C. Gutwin,et al.  Female advantage for spatial location memory in both static and dynamic environments , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  Y. Nihei,et al.  Sex Differences in Object Location Memory: The Female Advantage of Immediate Detection of Changes. , 2009 .

[31]  Jacob Raber,et al.  Effects of sex on object recognition and spatial navigation in humans , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[32]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  View dependence in scene recognition after active learning , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Edward Awh,et al.  Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Sara de Freitas,et al.  The use of 'exploratory learning' for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[35]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[36]  Arif Altun,et al.  The effect of multimedia design types on learners’ recall performances with varying short term memory spans , 2012, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[37]  Patrick Péruch,et al.  Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge Through Visual Exploration of Simulated Environments , 1995 .

[38]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis , 2000 .

[39]  Albert Postma,et al.  Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[41]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Hippocampal lesions impair memory for location but not color in passerine birds. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[42]  Daniel Voyer,et al.  Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[44]  Bradley S. Peterson,et al.  Sex and spatial position effects on object location memory following intentional learning of object identities , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Navigation in 3D virtual environments: Effects of user experience and location-pointing navigation aids , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  A. Mecklinger On the modularity of recognition memory for object form and spatial location: a topographic ERP analysis , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Irwin Silverman,et al.  Sex differences in spatial abilities: Evolutionary theory and data. , 1992 .

[48]  Graham Wideman,et al.  Gender differences in incidental learning and visual recognition memory : support for a sex difference in unconscious environmental awareness , 1998 .

[49]  R. Logie Visuo-spatial Working Memory , 1994 .

[50]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[51]  Jean Choi,et al.  Object Location Memory: A Direct Test of the Verbal Memory Hypothesis. , 2005 .

[52]  Irwin Silverman,et al.  The Hunter-Gatherer Theory of Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities: Data from 40 Countries , 2007, Archives of sexual behavior.

[53]  R. Kessels,et al.  The modified Location Learning Test: norms for the assessment of spatial memory function in neuropsychological patients. , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[54]  Hyun-Jeong Lee,et al.  Instructional Design of Web-based Simulations for Learners with Different Levels of Spatial Ability , 2007 .

[55]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[56]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[57]  Maiko Sakamoto,et al.  Sex Differences in Spatial Object-Location Memory in a Virtual Grocery Store , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[58]  Barry Harper,et al.  3D Environments for Spatial Learning: The Importance of Learning Task design , 2003 .

[59]  Barry Harper,et al.  User control and task authenticity for spatial learning in 3D environments , 2004 .

[60]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Navigating Buildings in "Desk-Top" Virtual Environments: Experimental Investigations Using Extended Navigational Experience , 1997 .

[61]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  3D or not 3D?: evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system , 2001, CHI.