Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the intraexaminer repeatability and interexaminer reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional (3-D) stereophogrammetric images. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-four stereophotogrammetric images were taken and 19 soft tissue points were identified. The images were obtained using the 3-DMD Face (3-DMD TM Ltd, Atlanta, Ga) system. Two examiners marked 34 images manually with a mouse-driven cursor 4 weeks apart. Intraexaminer marking differences were calculated and classified as <0.5 mm, 0.5-1 mm, and >1 mm. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intraexaminer reliability. A paired-samples t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the examiners. Interexaminer reproducibility was evaluated by kappa analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS Only one landmark (labiale superior) had an intraexaminer marking difference less than 0.5 mm. Existing landmarks had an intraexaminer difference less than 1 mm, but higher than 0.5 mm. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated good intraexaminer repeatability for both observers. The ICC range for examiners 1 and 2 was 0.986-1.000 and 0.990-1.000, respectively. Kappa scores showed good interexaminer agreement, especially on the z-axis. CONCLUSIONS Except labiale superior, the soft tissue landmarks used in this study were shown to have moderate reproducibility, but the difference between the landmarks was less than 1 mm, and they had clinically acceptable reproducibility.

[1]  F C van Ginkel,et al.  Quantification of facial morphology using stereophotogrammetry--demonstration of a new concept. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  Jens Fagertun,et al.  3D facial landmarks: Inter-operator variability of manual annotation , 2014, BMC Medical Imaging.

[3]  E M Bronkhorst,et al.  Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  R. Clark,et al.  Reproducibility of natural head position. , 1991, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  Tim Hutton,et al.  Reproducibility of soft tissue landmarks on three-dimensional facial scans. , 2006, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  Mohammad Y Hajeer,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. , 2002, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[7]  A D Linney,et al.  A three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of 16 skeletal class III patients following bimaxillary surgery. , 1992, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  S. Richmond,et al.  Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  David M. Sarvera,et al.  Orthodontics about face: the re-emergence of the esthetic paradigm. , 2000 .

[10]  S Richmond,et al.  Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images. , 2009, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[11]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Registration of 3D Photographs with Spiral CT Images for Soft Tissue Simulation in Maxillofacial Surgery , 2001, MICCAI.

[12]  P. Mozzo,et al.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results , 1998, European Radiology.