Influence of Aquifer Heterogeneity on Contaminant Transport at the Hanford Site

Aquifer heterogeneities defined by mapping and correlating lithofacies derived from existing geologic and borehole geophysical data at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Site (south–central Washington) were compared to tritium migration trends within the unconfined aquifer. Lithofacies percentage maps proved useful in defining large–scale (on the order of miles) tritium migration pathways at Hanford but were not sufficiently detailed to serve as unambiguous predictors of these pathways. Results suggest that: (1) incorporation of geologic parameters more closely related to hydraulic properties (e.g., quantified grain size and sorting, degree of cementation, packing arrangement, sedimentary structures, and grain shape), and (2) conscientious integration of all hydrogeologic data at the Hanford Site (and elsewhere) will allow definition of three-dimensional aquifer elements termed “hydrofacies” and enhance reliable prediction of contaminant migration pathways. Strict reliance on standard fluvial models in the evaluation of lithofacies at Hanford is not appropriate for predicting plume migration because of the complex depositional and erosional history of the sediments comprising the unconfined aquifer. Use of “hydrofacies” ultimately may serve as the appropriate conceptual framework for predicting plume migration.

[1]  R. Waitt,et al.  About Forty Last-Glacial Lake Missoula Jökulhlaups through Southern Washington , 1980, The Journal of Geology.

[2]  R. Waitt Periodic JöKulhlaups from Pleistocene Glacial Lake Missoula—New Evidence from Varved Sediment in Northern Idaho and Washington , 1984, Quaternary Research.

[3]  A. Miall Lithofacies Types and Vertical Profile Models in Braided River Deposits: A Summary , 1977 .

[4]  G. Gee,et al.  Arid site water balance: evapotranspiration modeling and measurements , 1984 .

[5]  F. J. Frank,et al.  Geology and ground-water characteristics of the Hanford Reservation of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington , 1972 .

[6]  J. Allen,et al.  The architecture of an alluvial suite: rocks between the Townsend Tuff and Pickard Bay Tuff Beds (early Devonian), southwest Wales , 1982 .

[7]  A. Miall Architectural-Element Analysis: A New Method of Facies Analysis Applied to Fluvial Deposits , 1985 .

[8]  Mike R. Leeder,et al.  A simulation model of alluvial stratigraphy , 1979 .

[9]  J. Bredehoeft,et al.  Computer model of two-dimensional solute transport and dispersion in ground water , 1978 .

[10]  John A. Cherry,et al.  Migration of contaminants in groundwater at a landfill: A case study: 4. A natural-gradient dispersion test , 1983 .

[11]  A. Journel Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions , 1983 .

[12]  S. Schumm The Fluvial System , 1977 .

[13]  M. Anderson Hydrogeologic facies models to delineate large-scale spatial trends in glacial and glaciofluvial sediments , 1989 .