Home Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes: Is It a Waste of Time?

A cross‐sectional study to assess home glucose monitoring practices was conducted in 200 non‐insulin‐treated diabetic patients consecutively attending our hospital clinic. Of the 200, 97 (48 %) patients (Group 1) regularly monitored urine (n = 74), blood (n = 19) or both (n = 4); 103 (52 %) patients (Group 2) performed no home monitoring. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, duration of diabetes and type of treatment. The prevalence of diabetic complications was also closely comparable and only peripheral neuropathy differed between the groups, being more common in Group 1 (n = 12) than Group 2 (n = 4); p < 0.05. There was also no significant difference between the HbA1 concentration (mean ± SD) in Group 1 (9.7 ± 2.2 %) and Group 2 (9.4 ± 2.0 %). The mean frequency of home monitoring was four tests weekly, but only 21 (22 %) kept a written record and 60 (62 %) would never alter their treatment on the basis of their results. Almost a third of patients could not interpret the results of monitoring or give the normal range of values. Home glucose monitoring, particularly of urine, is widely practised in Type 2 diabetes, at considerable overall expense. However, convincing evidence of its value in helping patients improve their blood glucose control or preventing the complications of the disease is lacking.

[1]  D. Chisholm,et al.  hyperglycaemia: disparity between diabetes clinic and home blood glucose concentrations , 2007 .

[2]  E. DeLong,et al.  Impact of Glucose Self-Monitoring on Non-lnsulin-Treated Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blood and Urine Testing , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[3]  G. Slama,et al.  Is glucose self-monitoring beneficial in non-insulin-treated diabetic patients? Results of a randomized comparative trial. , 1989, Diabete & metabolisme.

[4]  K. Huddle,et al.  Assessment of glycaemic control in the diabetic clinic , 1989 .

[5]  H. Chase,et al.  Glucose control and the renal and retinal complications of insulin-dependent diabetes. , 1989, JAMA.

[6]  D L DeMets,et al.  Glycosylated hemoglobin predicts the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. , 1988, JAMA.

[7]  L. Epstein,et al.  Does self-monitoring of blood glucose levels improve dietary compliance for obese patients with type II diabetes? , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Self‐monitoring of blood glucose levels in non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus , 1983, The Medical journal of Australia.

[9]  K. Alberti,et al.  Intensive attention improves glycaemic control in insulin-dependent diabetes without further advantage from home blood glucose monitoring: results of a controlled trial. , 1982 .

[10]  A. Kitabchi,et al.  Correlation between plasma and urine glucose in diabetes. , 1981, Annals of internal medicine.

[11]  D. Beaven,et al.  Home monitoring of blood glucose: a retrospective assessment in 38 insulin-requiring diabetics. , 1980, The New Zealand medical journal.

[12]  L. Epstein,et al.  Measurement and Modification of the Accuracy of Determinations of Urine Glucose Concentration , 1980, Diabetes Care.

[13]  T. Deckert,et al.  Prognosis of diabetics with diabetes onset before the age of thirty-one. I. Survival, causes of death, and complications. , 1978, Diabetologia.

[14]  J. Pirart Diabetes Mellitus and Its Degenerative Complications: A Prospective Study of 4,400 Patients Observed Between 1947 and 1973 , 1978, Diabetes Care.

[15]  A. Rosenbloom,et al.  The role of urine sugar in diabetic management. , 1976, American journal of diseases of children.

[16]  H. Dobson,et al.  Accuracy of Urine Testing for Sugar and Acetone by Hospital Ward Personnel , 1968, Diabetes.

[17]  W. Newman,et al.  Impact of glucose self-monitoring on glycohemoglobin values in a veteran population. , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.