The influence of cochlear implantation on some voice parameters.

OBJECTIVE Some of the voice characteristics of deaf people differ considerably from those of speakers with normal hearing. After a cochlear implantation, auditory control of voice production is possible and the quality of the voice is improved. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in some of the voice parameters in deaf children after cochlear implantation. METHODS Thirty-one prelingually deafened children implanted unilaterally at the age of 2.5-13 years were included in the study. For all of the children an acoustic analysis (Multi-Dimensional Voice Program, Kay Elemetrics Corp., USA) of the Slovene vowel 'a' was performed before cochlear implantation and 6, 12 and 24 months after the implantation. The fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR) were compared before and after the implantation. The results of the acoustic analyses were compared for the children who were implanted before or at the age of 4 years and the children who were implanted after the age of 4 years. RESULTS After the cochlear implantation the fundamental frequency did not change significantly. However, an improvement was noticed in the measurements of jitter (p=0.006) and shimmer (p=0.021) as early as 6 months after the implantation. The noise-to-harmonic ratio improved (p=0.013) 24 months after the implantation. The children implanted before or at the age of 4 years showed a significant improvement in jitter (p=0.003) and shimmer (p=0.004) as early as 6 months and in noise-to-harmonic ratio (p=0.021) 12 months after the implantation. In the children implanted after the age of 4 years the only significant change was detected in F0 (p=0.045), 12 months after the implantation, and in Shimmer (p=0.017), 24 months after the implantation. CONCLUSION The results of the present study have confirmed that cochlear implantation enables auditory moment-to-moment control of pitch and loudness. The determination of jitter and shimmer in the vowel 'a' sample proved to be a good and early indicator of improved phonation control, even in young children. The deaf children who were implanted before the age of 4 years improved their voice control more quickly and to a greater extent than the children implanted after the age of 4 years.

[1]  G M Siegel,et al.  Auditory feedback in the regulation of voice. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J. Elman.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. J. Yates.  Delayed auditory feedback. , 1963 .

[4]  R. S. Waldstein,et al.  Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Arlene Earley Carney,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Children’s Speech and Voice Physiology after Cochlear Implantation , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Characteristics of the Speech of Deaf Persons. , 1975 .

[7]  D. Denk,et al.  [Cochlear implantation and auditory feedback]. , 2000, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[8]  P. Dejonckere,et al.  A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques , 2001, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[9]  Paul Milner,et al.  Voice intensity of prospective cochlear implant candidates and normal hearing adult males , 1987, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  R. B. Monsen.  Acoustic qualities of phonation in young hearing-impaired children. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  M A Svirsky,et al.  Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Gerald N. Zimmermann,et al.  Articulatory patterns of an adventitiously deaf speaker: implications for the role of auditory information in speech production. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  S. Monini,et al.  Clarion cochlear implant: short-term effects on voice parameters. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[14]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Changes of voice and articulation in children with cochlear implants. , 2002, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[15]  J B Spitzer,et al.  Reacquisition of contrastive stress in an adventitiously deaf speaker using a single-channel cochlear implant. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M. Žargi,et al.  Instability of voice in adolescence: pathologic condition or normal developmental variation? , 1997, The Journal of pediatrics.

[17]  A. Holbrook,et al.  THE VOWEL FORMANTS OF DEAF AND NORMAL-HEARING ELEVEN- TO FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD BOYS. , 1964, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.