Work ability and duration of certified sickness absence

Aims: The aim of this study was to examine the association between assessed work ability and the duration of certified sickness absence. Methods: A total of 549 patients and 52 doctors provided questionnaire data about 549 episodes of absence. The episodes were classified as new, one month, or three months according to their duration at the time of questionnaire completion. Their duration after that was used as outcome. Uni-and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. Results: In the multivariate analyses, a ``very much reduced' ' work ability assessed by patients was associated with a longer duration than a ``moderately reduced' ' work ability, in both one- and three-month episodes. Musculoskeletal and psychological disorders were associated with a longer duration, and respiratory disorders with a shorter duration than other disorders in new episodes. Patient age above 50 years was associated with a longer duration than lower age in new and three-month episodes. The doctors' use of referral and tests in the consultations, and the presence of non-medical factors as judged by the patients, were associated with a longer duration than the absence of those factors in new episodes. The patients' degree of job satisfaction, and non-medical factors as judged by doctors, were significantly associated with duration only in univariate Cox regression analyses in new episodes. Work demands were not significantly associated with duration in any of the analyses. Conclusions: Work ability assessed by patients may be a useful prognostic indicator of duration in prolonged episodes of certified sickness absence. Further studies using other outcomes, such as disability pensioning, would be of interest to enlighten the concepts of work ability.

[1]  P. Allebeck,et al.  Sick-leave among women and the role of psychiatric disorder , 1997, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[2]  D Commenges,et al.  Illustration of analysis taking into account complex survey considerations: the association between wine consumption and dementia in the PAQUID study. Personnes Ages Quid. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  K. Manderbacka How do respondents understand survey questions on ill-health? , 1998 .

[4]  J Luz,et al.  Sickness absenteeism from work--a critical review of the literature. , 1997, Public health reviews.

[5]  G. Tellnes Sickness certification in general practice: a review. , 1989, Family practice.

[6]  J. Ilmarinen,et al.  Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  D Bruusgaard,et al.  Incidence of sickness certification. Proposal for use as a health status indicator. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[8]  J Ilmarinen,et al.  Summary of the Finnish research project (1981-1992) to promote the health and work ability of aging workers. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[9]  K. Manderbacka,et al.  Assessing reliability of a measure of self-rated health , 1996, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[10]  P Oja,et al.  Self-rated health status as a health measure: the predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  S. Brage,et al.  The gender gap in musculoskeletal-related long term sickness absence in Norway , 1998, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[12]  P. Östlin,et al.  Occupational history, self reported chronic illness, and mortality: a follow up of 25,586 Swedish men and women. , 1990, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[13]  M Marmot,et al.  Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. , 1995, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  H. Ursin,et al.  Patients With Low Back Pain Not Returning to Work: A 12‐Month Follow‐up Study , 1998, Spine.

[15]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[16]  H. Ursin,et al.  Patients With Low Back Pain Not Returning to Work: A 12‐Month Follow‐up Study , 1998, Spine.

[17]  P. Bjurulf,et al.  The Accordance of Diagnoses in a Computerized Sick-Leave Register with Doctor's Certificates and Medical Records , 1991, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[18]  H Hemingway,et al.  Sickness absence from back pain, psychosocial work characteristics and employment grade among office workers. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[19]  S. Brage,et al.  Work ability assessed by patients and their GPs in new episodes of sickness certification. , 2000, Family practice.

[20]  M Marmot,et al.  Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[21]  W. E. van der Weide,et al.  Prognostic factors for chronic disability from acute low-back pain in occupational health care. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[22]  L. Sandvik,et al.  Inter-doctor variation in sickness certification. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[23]  O. Førde,et al.  The Tromsø Study: predictors of self-evaluated health--has society adopted the expanded health concept? , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[24]  S. Brage,et al.  ICPC as a standard classification in Norway. , 1996, Family practice.

[25]  H. Hurri,et al.  Relationship between the self-assessment and clinical assessment of health status and work ability. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[26]  J. Vahtera,et al.  The effect of objective job demands on registered sickness absence spells; do personal, social and job-related resources act as moderators? , 1996 .

[27]  L. Sandvik,et al.  Occupational factors in sickness certification. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[28]  G. Tellnes Duration of episodes of sickness certification. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.