Building a Values‐Informed Mental Model for New Orleans Climate Risk Management

Individuals use values to frame their beliefs and simplify their understanding when confronted with complex and uncertain situations. The high complexity and deep uncertainty involved in climate risk management (CRM) lead to individuals' values likely being coupled to and contributing to their understanding of specific climate risk factors and management strategies. Most mental model approaches, however, which are commonly used to inform our understanding of people's beliefs, ignore values. In response, we developed a "Values-informed Mental Model" research approach, or ViMM, to elicit individuals' values alongside their beliefs and determine which values people use to understand and assess specific climate risk factors and CRM strategies. Our results show that participants consistently used one of three values to frame their understanding of risk factors and CRM strategies in New Orleans: (1) fostering a healthy economy, wealth, and job creation, (2) protecting and promoting healthy ecosystems and biodiversity, and (3) preserving New Orleans' unique culture, traditions, and historically significant neighborhoods. While the first value frame is common in analyses of CRM strategies, the latter two are often ignored, despite their mirroring commonly accepted pillars of sustainability. Other values like distributive justice and fairness were prioritized differently depending on the risk factor or strategy being discussed. These results suggest that the ViMM method could be a critical first step in CRM decision-support processes and may encourage adoption of CRM strategies more in line with stakeholders' values.

[1]  A. Leiserowitz.  Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[2]  M. Siegrist,et al.  The Role of the Affect and Availability Heuristics in Risk Communication , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  J. Martinich,et al.  Joint effects of storm surge and sea-level rise on US Coasts: new economic estimates of impacts, adaptation, and benefits of mitigation policy , 2014, Climatic Change.

[4]  J. Baron.  Thinking About Global Warming , 2006 .

[5]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  S. Moser.  Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions , 2010 .

[7]  David Etkin,et al.  Climate Change: Perceptions and Discourses of Risk , 2007 .

[8]  Sebastiaan N. Jonkman,et al.  Risk to life due to flooding in post-Katrina New Orleans , 2012 .

[9]  Simon Dietz,et al.  The Equity-Efficiency Trade-off in Environmental Policy: Evidence from Stated Preferences , 2010, Land Economics.

[10]  E. Barbier,et al.  The Value of Wetlands in Protecting Southeast Louisiana from Hurricane Storm Surges , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Joshua D. Greene.  From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  COMMUNICATING RISK TO THE PUBLIC , 1992 .

[13]  John M. Frost,et al.  Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply , 2005 .

[14]  G. Vecchi,et al.  Modeled Impact of Anthropogenic Warming on the Frequency of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes , 2010, Science.

[15]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  Risk Communication, Public Engagement, and Climate Change: A Role for Emotions , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1 , 1996 .

[17]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[18]  W. Adger,et al.  Successful adaptation to climate change across scales , 2005 .

[19]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  The sciences of science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  E. Weber,et al.  Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States Scientific Understanding of Climate Change These Assess- Ments Support the following Conclusions with High Or , 2011 .

[21]  Troy D. Abel,et al.  A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism , 1999 .

[22]  K. Gotham.  Coastal Restoration as Contested Terrain: Climate Change and the Political Economy of Risk Reduction in Louisiana , 2016 .

[23]  K. Krippendorff.  Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations , 2004 .

[24]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Now What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Robert J Lempert,et al.  A new decision sciences for complex systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  Expanding the Reach of Participatory Risk Management: Testing an Online Decision‐Aiding Framework for Informing Internally Consistent Choices , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[28]  R. Stedman.  Toward a Social Psychology of Place , 2002 .

[29]  Robert Gramling,et al.  Community Impacts of Technological Change: Toward a Longitudinal Perspective , 1992 .

[30]  Nancy Tuana.  Embedding philosophers in the practices of science: bringing humanities to the sciences , 2012, Synthese.

[31]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy , 2009 .

[32]  C. Field,et al.  Risk Management and Climate Change , 2012 .

[33]  H. Dowlatabadi,et al.  Comparing public rationales for justice trade-offs in mitigation and adaptation climate policy dilemmas , 2012 .

[34]  Climate Science: An Empirical Example of Postnormal Science , 1999 .

[35]  P. Irvine,et al.  Towards Integrated Ethical and Scientific Analysis of Geoengineering: A Research Agenda , 2012 .

[36]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences* , 2007 .

[37]  Derek Armitage,et al.  Place identity and climate change adaptation: a synthesis and framework for understanding , 2012 .

[38]  W. Adger,et al.  Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? , 2009 .

[39]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bringing values and deliberation to science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Exceedance of heat index thresholds for 15 regions under a warming climate using the wet‐bulb globe temperature , 2012 .

[41]  R. Dawes,et al.  Psychological perspectives on justice: Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives , 1993 .

[42]  J. Ribot,et al.  Special Issue Introduction: Adding insult to injury: Climate change and the inequities of climate intervention , 2012 .

[43]  P. Tetlock.  Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  C. C. Watson,et al.  Restoration of the Mississippi Delta: Lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita , 2007, Science.

[45]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[46]  M. Kirwan,et al.  Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise , 2013, Nature.

[47]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives , 2006 .

[48]  S. Roeser,et al.  Nuclear energy, responsible risk communication and moral emotions: a three level framework , 2015 .

[49]  Gary W. Yohe,et al.  Managing the risks of climate thresholds: uncertainties and information needs , 2008 .

[50]  I. Lorenzoni,et al.  Danger is all around: Eliciting expert perceptions for managing climate change through a mental models approach☆ , 2007 .

[51]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.