Transdisciplinary landscape planning: Does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium)
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Wesley Schultz,et al. Values and Proenvironmental Behavior , 1998 .
[2] Timothy O'Riordan,et al. Nature conservation for future sustainable shorelines: Lessons from seeking to involve the public , 2009 .
[3] Margot A. Olson,et al. The attitudes of interior design students towards sustainability , 2009 .
[4] M. Zanna,et al. Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .
[5] Iain Walker,et al. Utilizing a social-ecological framework to promote water and energy conservation: A field experiment , 2005 .
[6] Mohamed M. Mostafa,et al. Gender Differences in Egyptian Consumers Green Purchase Behaviour: The Effects of Environmental Knowledge, Concern and Attitude , 2007 .
[7] Xiaodong Chen,et al. Household Location Choices: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[8] G. Fry,et al. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure , 2006 .
[9] G. Tress,et al. Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research , 2001 .
[10] Linda Soneryd. Public involvement in the planning process: EIA and lessons from the Örebro airport extension, Sweden , 2004 .
[11] C. Vlek,et al. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .
[12] Arnold Vedlitz,et al. Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[13] Roy Haines-Young,et al. “Rio+10”, sustainability science and Landscape Ecology☆ , 2006 .
[14] J. Brandt. Key concepts and interdisciplinearity in Landscape Ecology: a summing-up and outlook , 1998 .
[15] F. Kaiser,et al. Contrasting the Theory of Planned Behavior With the Value‐Belief‐Norm Model in Explaining Conservation Behavior1 , 2005 .
[16] Marc Antrop,et al. Rural Landscapes: past processes and future strategies , 2005 .
[17] M. Antrop. Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? , 2006 .
[18] Gary Fry,et al. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice , 2005 .
[19] G. Tress,et al. Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning—a study from Denmark , 2003 .
[20] Chris Park. Landscape ecology: Theory and applications: Z. Naveh and A.S. Lieberman, 356 pp., Springer, New York, $40.30 , 1986 .
[21] Hans Antonson,et al. Landscapes with history: addressing shortcomings in Swedish EIAs. , 2009 .
[22] R. Dunlap,et al. Validating a Comprehensive Model of Environmental Concern Cross‐Nationally: A U.S.‐Canadian Comparison* , 2007 .
[23] G. Tress,et al. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research , 2001 .
[24] Hans Antonson,et al. Bridging the gap between research and planning practice concerning landscape in Swedish infrastructural planning , 2009 .
[25] R. Dunlap,et al. Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .
[26] Judit Arends-Tóth,et al. Acculturation attitudes: A comparison of measurement methods , 2007 .
[27] Rolf Lidskog,et al. Transport Infrastructure Investment and Environmental Impact Assessment in Sweden: Public Involvement or Exclusion? , 2000 .
[28] Marc Antrop,et al. Evaluation of the process of integration in a transdisciplinary landscape study in the Pajottenland (Flanders, Belgium) , 2006 .
[29] Noah J. Goldstein,et al. The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.
[30] A. Smart,et al. Urbanization and the Global Perspective , 2003 .
[31] Gary Fry,et al. Analysis of the barriers to integration in landscape research projects , 2007 .
[32] R. Dunlap,et al. The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .
[33] M. Antrop. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future , 2005 .
[34] A. Vatn,et al. Local democracy implications for coastal zone management—A case study in southern Norway , 2009 .
[35] Todd W. Bressi,et al. Understanding ordinary landscapes , 1997 .
[36] A. Stamps. Demographic Effects in Environmental Aesthetics: A Meta-Analysis , 1999 .
[37] Judit Arends-Tóth,et al. Multiculturalism and acculturation: views of Dutch and Turkish–Dutch , 2003 .
[38] Z. Naveh. Interactions of landscapes and cultures , 1995 .
[39] Veerle Van Eetvelde,et al. A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterisation for trans-regional integration, applied on the federal state of Belgium. , 2009 .
[40] H. Holmén,et al. Approaching Reality : Comparing Stakeholder Analysis and Cultural Theory in the Context of Natural Resource Management , 2008 .
[41] Richard J. Hobbs,et al. Key Topics in Landscape Ecology: Frontmatter , 2007 .
[42] Felix Kienast,et al. Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement , 2003 .
[43] M. Stenseke. Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: Lessons from Sweden , 2009 .
[44] P. Wesley Schultz,et al. Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior , 2005 .
[45] P. Schultz,et al. VALUES AS PREDICTORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES: EVIDENCE FOR CONSISTENCY ACROSS 14 COUNTRIES , 1999 .
[46] M. Antrop,et al. European Rural Landscapes. Persistence and Change in a Globalising Environment. , 2004 .
[47] Alan Bond,et al. Public participation in EIA of nuclear power plant decommissioning projects: a case study analysis , 2004 .
[48] R. Dunlap,et al. THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .
[49] Z. Naveh. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes , 2001 .
[50] Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al. Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling , 2007 .
[51] Zev Naveh,et al. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY: THEORY AND APPLICATION , 1983, Landscape Journal.
[52] P. Schultz. New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .
[53] K. Soini. Between Insideness and Outsideness — Studying Locals’ Perceptions of Landscape , 2004 .
[54] Marc Antrop,et al. The language of landscape ecologists and planners: A comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology , 2001 .
[55] Å. Ode,et al. Public evaluation of landscape content and change: several examples from Europe. , 2009 .
[56] Marc Antrop,et al. Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.
[57] G. Wood,et al. EIA scoping in England and Wales: Practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints , 2006 .
[58] J. F. Coeterier,et al. GROUP DIFFERENCES IN THE AESTHETIC EVALUATION OF NATURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH , 1998 .
[59] P. Shannon,et al. Local landscape designations in Scotland: Opportunity or barrier to effective landscape management? , 2007 .
[60] J. Stephenson. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes , 2008 .
[61] M. Nijnik,et al. Analyzing public preferences concerning woodland development in rural landscapes in Scotland , 2008 .
[62] Jyrki Aakkula,et al. Framing the biodiversity of agricultural landscape: The essence of local conceptions and constructions , 2007 .
[63] Karen Bickerstaff,et al. Participatory Local Governance and Transport Planning , 2001 .
[64] A. Stirling. Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis , 2006 .