PDAs as lifelong learning tools: an activity theory based analysis

This paper describes the use of an activity theory (AT) framework to analyze the ways that distance part time learners and mobile workers adapted and appropriated mobile devices for their activities and in turn how their use of these new tools changed the ways that they carried out their learning or their work. It is argued that there are two key strengths in using an activity theory framework in this context. The first strength is the emphasis activity theory places on tools, including computer artefacts, as mediators of activity. This emphasis focuses attention on the activity itself rather than, for example, simply the interaction between the human and the computer. The focus is on the learner or user’s objectives and activities and the computer is the tool through which the user achieves her objectives. The second strength was referred to briefly above. The AT perspective also enabled analysis of an interactive dynamic process of users or learners and their tools—in this case personal digital assistants (PDAs). It revealed a two way process in which the user adapts the tools they use according to their everyday practice and preferences in order to carry out their activities; and how, in turn, the tools themselves also modify the activities that the user is engaged in. Three case studies illustrate these processes. The first case study is of distance learners’ use of e‐books on PDAs, to supplement their access to other static media such as books and computers. The second case study investigated how mobile workers in the energy industry used mobile devices to access information when away from the office. The third and final case study investigated the use of mobile devices in an art gallery. The paper concludes with a discussion of the information access needs that are apparent in each of these learning contexts, and highlights the pertinent issues in the use of mobile technologies to support lifelong learners’ information needs.

[1]  S. Davis Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Adele Goldberg,et al.  Personal Dynamic Media , 1977, Computer.

[3]  Mike Sharples,et al.  The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents , 1997, CHI.

[5]  John Cook,et al.  Beyond formal learning: Informal community eLearning , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Handheld use in K-12: a descriptive account , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.

[7]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface , 1991 .

[8]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[9]  N. Nugent,et al.  European Commission , 1993, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[10]  W. Frawley Mind as Action , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Jenny Waycott,et al.  Reading with new tools: an evaluation of Personal Digital Assistants as tools for reading course materials , 2002 .

[13]  Phil Turner,et al.  A web of contradictions , 2001, Interact. Comput..

[14]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[15]  J. Wertsch The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[16]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Designing Usable Electronic Text: Ergonomic Aspects Of Human Information Usage , 1994 .

[17]  Mirjana Spasojevic,et al.  From Informing to Remembering: Ubiquitous Systems in Interactive Museums , 2002, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[18]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere , 2001, TCHI.

[19]  Ole Smørdal,et al.  Personal Digital Assistants in medical education and practice , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  B. Lomov The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1982 .

[21]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The task-artifact cycle , 1991 .

[22]  Nancy Proctor,et al.  The State of the Art in Museum Handhelds in 2003. , 2003 .

[23]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme,et al.  Students' experiences with PDAs for reading course materials , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[24]  J. Falk,et al.  Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning , 2000 .

[25]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Log on education: Handheld devices are ready-at-hand , 2001, CACM.

[26]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Taking the 'No' out of Lotus Notes: activity theory, groupware, and student groupwork , 2002, CSCL.

[27]  S. Hsi,et al.  A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[28]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[29]  Yuh-Shyan Chen,et al.  A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[30]  E. Vass,et al.  Understanding collaborative creativity : an observational study of the effects of the social and educational context on the processes of young children's joint creative writing , 2003 .

[31]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[32]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Data entry for mobile devices: an empirical comparison of novice performance with Jot and Graffiti , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[33]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice , 1993 .

[34]  B. Nardi Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .