A “Do‐It‐Yourself” interactive bone structure module: Development and evaluation of an online teaching resource

A stand‐alone online teaching module was developed to cover an area of musculoskeletal anatomy (structure of bone) found to be difficult by students. The material presented in the module was not formally presented in any other way, thus providing additional time for other curriculum components, but it was assessed in the final examination. The module was developed using “in‐house” software designed for academics with minimal computer experience. The efficacy and effectiveness of the module was gauged via student surveys, testing student knowledge before and after module introduction, and analysis of final examination results. At least 74% of the class used the module and student responses were positive regarding module usability (navigation, interaction) and utility (learning support). Learning effectiveness was demonstrated by large significant improvements in the post‐presentation test scores for “users” compared with “non‐users” and by the percentage of correct responses to relevant multiple choice questions in the final examination. Performance on relevant short answer questions in the final examination was, on average, comparable to that for other components. Though limited by study structure, it was concluded that the module produced learning outcomes equivalent to those generated by more traditional teaching methods. This “Do‐It‐Yourself” e‐learning approach may be particularly useful for meeting specific course needs not catered for by commercial applications or where there are cost limitations for generation of online learning material. The specific approaches used in the study can assist in development of effective online resources in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 6: 107–113. © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.

[1]  W C Taylor,et al.  A preliminary investigation of three types of multiple choice questions , 1979, Medical education.

[2]  Matthias Holzer,et al.  Student learning preferences and the impact of a multimedia learning tool in the dissection course at the University of Munich. , 2009, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[3]  Fred Paas,et al.  Effects of instructional strategies using cross sections on the recognition of anatomical structures in correlated CT and MR images , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[4]  D. Cook The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it , 2009, Medical teacher.

[5]  Anne Patry,et al.  The development of interactive online learning tools for the study of Anatomy , 2008, Medical teacher.

[6]  G. Smythe,et al.  Self‐directed learning in gross human anatomy: Assessment outcomes and student perceptions , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[7]  John A McNulty,et al.  Evaluation of computer‐aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six‐year study , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[8]  Sanjay G Patel,et al.  Design and implementation of a web-based, database-driven histology atlas: technology at work. , 2006, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[9]  Anke Hollinderbäumer,et al.  On the use and value of new media and how medical students assess their effectiveness in learning anatomy. , 2004, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[10]  Furman S. McDonald,et al.  E-Learning: Is There Anything Special about the "E"? , 2008, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[11]  Florin D. Salajan,et al.  Learning with web-based interactive objects: An investigation into student perceptions of effectiveness , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Douglas J Gould,et al.  A usability study of users' perceptions toward a multimedia computer‐assisted learning tool for neuroanatomy , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[13]  Ahmet Sinav,et al.  Interactive web-based programs to teach functional anatomy: the pterygopalatine fossa. , 2004, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[14]  Gabrielle M Finn,et al.  A qualitative study of student responses to body painting , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[15]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances , 2010, BMC medical education.

[16]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Web‐based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[17]  Daniel Saddawi-Konefka,et al.  The impact of interactive, computerized educational modules on preclinical medical education , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[18]  Richard Guy Increasing student engagement in physiology - the use of simple spinal reflex animations , 2011 .

[19]  Alison F. Doubleday,et al.  The virtual anatomy laboratory: Usability testing to improve an online learning resource for anatomy education , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[20]  B Pflesser,et al.  A novel interactive anatomic atlas of the hand , 2006, Clinical anatomy.

[21]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The instructional effect of coding (color and black and white) on information acquisition and retrieval , 1983 .

[22]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies , 2010, Medical education.

[23]  R. Clark,et al.  Dangers in the evaluation of instructional media , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[24]  Lutz Vollrath,et al.  Anatomy online: Presentation of a detailed WWW atlas of human gross anatomy—reference for medical education , 2002, Clinical anatomy.

[25]  P. McCoubrie Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review , 2004, Medical teacher.

[26]  Patricia Deubel An Investigation of Behaviorist and Cognitive Approaches to Instructional Multimedia Design. , 2003 .

[27]  I G Premadasa,et al.  A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions. , 1993, Medical teacher.

[28]  E. Allen,et al.  Effects of interactive instructional techniques in a web-based peripheral nervous system component for human anatomy , 2008, Medical teacher.

[29]  F. Reilly,et al.  Outcomes from building system courseware for teaching and testing in a discipline‐based human structure curriculum , 2011, Anatomical sciences education.

[30]  Lih-Wei Lei,et al.  Evaluation of computer-assisted instruction in histology: effect of interaction on learning outcome. , 2005, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[31]  G. Norman,et al.  Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e‐learning instructional designs , 2007, Medical education.