Accuracy of Six Commercially Available Systems for Identification of Members of the Family Vibrionaceae

ABSTRACT Six commercially available bacterial identification products were tested with Vibrio alginolyticus (12 strains), V. cholerae (30 strains), Photobacterium (Vibrio) damselae (10 strains), V. fluvialis (10 strains), V. furnissii (4 strains), V. hollisae (10 strains), V. metschnikovii (9 strains), V. mimicus (10 strains), V. parahaemolyticus (30 strains), and V. vulnificus (10 strains) to determine the accuracy of each system for identification. The products included API 20E, Crystal E/NF, MicroScan Neg ID2 and Rapid Neg ID3, and Vitek GNI+ and ID-GNB. Each product was tested only with those species that were listed in its database. Overall, the systems correctly identified 63.9, 80.9, 63.1, 73.6, 73.5, and 77.7% of the isolates to species level, respectively. Error rates ranged from 0.8% for the API 20E to 10.4% for the Rapid Neg ID3. The API 20E gave “no identification” for 13.1% of the isolates, while the Neg ID2, GNI+, ID-GNB, and Crystal were unable to identify 1.8, 2.9, 5.0, and 6.9%, respectively. For V. cholerae, specifically, accuracy ranged from 50.0 to 96.7%, with the API 20E having the worst performance and Crystal having the best. V. fluvialis presented the biggest challenge for the API 20E and the GNI+, with probabilities averaging 10%, while V. mimicus was a major problem with the Crystal E/NF, which identified none of the strains correctly. With the Neg ID2, correct answers were often obtained only after a modified inoculation of the panel with a bacterial suspension prepared with 0.85% NaCl. Additional tests required for identification often included growth in the absence of NaCl, which is not readily available in most clinical laboratories. The only product to correctly identify at least 90% of V. cholerae strains was the Crystal E/NF, and only three of the six products, the API 20E and both of the Vitek cards, correctly identified more than 90% of the V. parahaemolyticus strains. Thus, extreme care must be taken in the interpretation of answers from these six commercially available systems for the identification of Vibrio species.

[1]  Y. Takeda,et al.  Extended serotyping scheme forVibrio cholerae , 1994, Current Microbiology.

[2]  J. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of the Vitek 2 ID-GNB Assay for Identification of Members of the Family Enterobacteriaceae and Other Nonenteric Gram-Negative Bacilli and Comparison with the Vitek GNI+ Card , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  Role of the Hospital-Based Microbiology Laboratory in Preparation for and Response to a Bioterrorism Event , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  T. Ling,et al.  Evaluation of VITEK 2 Rapid Identification and Susceptibility Testing System against Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[5]  Bioterrorism: Laboratory Security , 2001 .

[6]  J. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of the MicroScan Rapid Neg ID3 Panel for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae and Some Common Gram-Negative Nonfermenters , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  R. Courcol,et al.  Evaluation of an Automated System for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae and Nonfermenting Bacilli , 1999, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[8]  D. Swerdlow,et al.  Clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological features of Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 3 causing outbreaks of wound infection and bacteraemia in Israel , 1999, The Lancet.

[9]  Dominique Monnet,et al.  Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Rapid Identification of Medically Relevant Gram-Negative Rods , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  S. Abbott,et al.  Misidentification of Unusual AeromonasSpecies as Members of the Genus Vibrio: a Continuing Problem , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  J. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF Identification Systems for Identification of Members of the Family Enterobacteriaceae and Other Gram-Negative, Glucose-Fermenting and Non-Glucose-Fermenting Bacilli , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  J. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF identification systems for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative, glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting bacilli , 1997 .

[13]  B. Purcell,et al.  Rapidly fatal infection due to Photobacterium (Vibrio) damsela. , 1997, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[14]  R. Raz,et al.  Vibrio infection in Israel due to changes in fish marketing , 1996, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Penny,et al.  Clinical manifestations and molecular epidemiology of five cases of diarrhoea in children associated with Vibrio metschnikovii in Arequipa, Peru. , 1996, Journal of medical microbiology.

[16]  S. Suh,et al.  Primary Vibrio damsela septicemia. , 1996, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[17]  E. Biosca,et al.  Vibrio vulnificus biotype 2, pathogenic for eels, is also an opportunistic pathogen for humans , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  A. Lopez,et al.  Acute gastroenteritis caused by Vibrio alginolyticus in an immunocompetent patient. , 1995, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[19]  Y. McCarter,et al.  Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[20]  B. Holmes,et al.  Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[21]  S. Abbott,et al.  Severe gastroenteritis associated with Vibrio hollisae infection: report of two cases and review. , 1994, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[22]  A. Halstensen,et al.  Mixed bacteremia with Vibrio metschnikovii in an 83-year-old female patient. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[23]  J. Gigi,et al.  Severe human infections caused by Vibrio metschnikovii , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[24]  E. Garay,et al.  Evaluation of the API 20E system for identification and discrimination of Vibrio vulnificus biotypes 1 and 2 , 1993 .

[25]  R. Colwell,et al.  Vibrio cincinnatiensis sp. nov., a new human pathogen , 1986, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[26]  T. L. Overman,et al.  Comparison of API 20E, API rapid E, and API rapid NFT for identification of members of the family Vibrionaceae , 1985, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[27]  D. J. Brenner,et al.  Enterobacter sakazakii: A New Species of “Enterobacteriaceae” Isolated from Clinical Specimens , 1980 .

[28]  J. J. Farmer,et al.  Salmonella typhi: identification, antibiograms, serology, and bacteriophage typing , 1978 .

[29]  Ellen Jo Baron,et al.  Manual of clinical microbiology , 1975 .

[30]  D. Rhoden,et al.  API system: a multitube micromethod for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. , 1972, Applied microbiology.

[31]  W. Ewing,et al.  Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. , 1972 .