Procedural debiasing of primacy/anchoring effects in clinical-like judgments.

Primacy (or anchoring) effects in clinical judgment occur when information presented at an early stage unduly influences a judgment compared to the effect of the same information presented at a later stage. Using recent theoretical models of these effects, three debiasing methods were developed and tested for their efficacy. Contrary to some recent failures to find anchoring effects, both single-cue and sequence anchoring manipulations produced medium-size effects on personality trait ratings and generalized to predictions of behavior. A consider-the-opposite procedure that involved cue sorting by diagnosticity debiased single-cue anchoring, but comparable results were obtained by subjects who simply took notes while reviewing each cue prior to judgment. Bias inoculation was marginally successful at reducing single-cue anchoring. Methodological issues as well as suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  W. A. Hunt,et al.  The effects of assimilation and contrast in judgments of clinical materials. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  C. Sharpley,et al.  Varying the Order in which Positive and Negative Information Is Presented: Effects on Counselors' Judgments of Clients' Mental Health. , 1989 .

[3]  M. Wierzbicki,et al.  Anchoring errors in clinical-like judgments. , 1990, Journal of clinical psychology.

[4]  H. Garb,et al.  Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  R. Leaman,et al.  ANCHORING EFFECTS IN SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL JUDGMENTS. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  E. Langer,et al.  A patient by any other name--clinician group difference in labeling bias. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[7]  M L Friedlander,et al.  Anchoring and publicity effects in clinical judgment. , 1983, Journal of clinical psychology.

[8]  P. Devine,et al.  Cognitive mediation of inconsistency discounting , 1985 .

[9]  Jeffrey S. Hornsby,et al.  The effects of job description content on job evaluation judgments , 1990 .

[10]  S. Plous,et al.  Thinking the Unthinkable : The Effects of Anchoring on Likelihood Estimates of Nuclear Warl , 1989 .

[11]  R O Nelson,et al.  The treatment utility of assessment. A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality. , 1987, The American psychologist.

[12]  C. M. York,et al.  Amount of Information and Primacy-Recency Effects in Recruitment Decisions. , 1975 .

[13]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  INOCULATION AND COUNTEREXPLANATION:DEBIASH"G TECHNIQUES IN THEPERSEVERANCE OF SOCIAL THEORIES , 1982 .

[14]  P. Costa,et al.  Clinical Assessment Can Benefit From Recent Advances In Personality Psychology , 1986 .

[15]  M. K. Temerlin.  SUGGESTION EFFECTS IN PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS , 1968, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[16]  H. Arkes.  Principles in judgment/decision making research pertinent to legal proceedings , 1989 .

[17]  Daniel Cervone,et al.  Sequence Anchoring and Self-Efficacy: Primacy Effects in the Consideration of Possibilities , 1989 .

[18]  L. Beutler,et al.  Systematic treatment selection : toward targeted therapeutic interventions , 1990 .

[19]  Frank Dumont,et al.  Inferential heuristics in clinical problem formulation: Selective review of their strengths and weaknesses. , 1993 .

[20]  J. Kleiven,et al.  An experimental investigation of the labelling effect of psychiatric diagnosis , 1979 .

[21]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived Informativeness of Facts. , 1977 .

[22]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment , 1988 .

[23]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. , 1988 .

[24]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[25]  H. Arkes.  Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. , 1991 .

[26]  David Faust,et al.  Eliminating the hindsight bias. , 1988 .

[27]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation. , 1979 .

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Debiasing , 1982 .

[29]  Considering the Harshest Verdict First , 1986 .

[30]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance , 1985 .

[31]  N. Anderson,et al.  Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  S. Belmore.  Determinants of attention during impression formation. , 1987 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[34]  H. Arkes,et al.  Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. , 1981, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  N. Anderson.  PRIMACY EFFECTS IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION USING A GENERALIZED ORDER EFFECT PARADIGM. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[37]  Nicholas Ladany,et al.  Anchoring Errors in Clinical Judgments: Type I Error, Adjustment, or Mitigation?. , 1990 .

[38]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  On the Psychology of Experimental Surprises. , 1977 .

[39]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Effects of Varying Trait Inconsistency and Response Requirements on the Primacy Effect in Impression Formation. , 1970 .

[40]  Y. Trope,et al.  Confirmatory and diagnosing strategies in social information gathering. , 1982 .

[41]  W. Swann,et al.  Hypothesis-Testing Processes in Social Interaction , 1978 .

[42]  David Faust,et al.  Research on human judgment and its application to clinical practice. , 1986 .

[43]  D. Cervone,et al.  Anchoring, Efficacy and Action: The Influence of Judgmental Heuristics on Self-Efficacy Judgments a , 1986 .

[44]  H. Eysenck.  The structure of human personality , 1953 .

[45]  M. Lepper,et al.  Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  N. Pennington,et al.  Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. , 1986 .

[47]  E. Beurs,et al.  The influence of prior information about clients on evaluations and responses of clinicians during family therapy , 1991 .

[48]  D. Faust,et al.  Clinical judgment and decision making in neuropsychology. , 1989, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[49]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Information-gathering strategies in hypothesis-testing , 1983 .

[50]  B. Brehmer.  In one word: Not from experience. , 1980 .

[51]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  J. Ford,et al.  Process tracing methods: Contributions, problems, and neglected research questions , 1989 .

[53]  S. Phillips,et al.  Preventing anchoring errors in clinical judgment. , 1984, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[54]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.