Stenciling-Based “Prick and Print” Technique for Harvesting Shaped Corneal Grafts for Management of Peripheral Corneal Perforations

Purpose: To evaluate a new surgical technique (“prick and print”) for harvesting shaped donor corneal grafts in cases with perforated peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series at a tertiary center. Medical records of 13 patients with perforated PUK, who underwent tectonic eccentric keratoplasty using the stenciling-based prick and print technique during the past 1 year, were reviewed. All patients (15 eyes of 13 patients) received grafts of varying sizes and shapes (14 crescentic and 1 biconvex). Factors evaluated were tectonic integrity, graft apposition, and complications, if any. Surgical success was defined as maintenance of corneal integrity and healing of PUK. Results: Mean age of patients was 40.6 ± 19.4 years. Mean follow-up was 10 months. We achieved surgical success in 80% (12/15 eyes) of cases. Two eyes had graft infection, and regrafting (large circular graft) was performed for both. One eye developed new-site PUK, which was managed medically, and the graft remained viable tectonically. After surgery, 9 eyes achieved a best-corrected visual acuity of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution +0.3 or better. No cases had graft rejection or peripheral anterior synechiae by final follow-up. Conclusions: The stenciling-based prick and print technique for making shaped donor corneal grafts may offer a simple, easy-to-learn surgical technique that can be used to make any shape or pattern of donor corneal grafts without involving the optical center, even in extensive peripheral corneal lesions.

[1]  R. Vajpayee,et al.  “Copy and Fix”: A New Technique of Harvesting Freehand and Horseshoe Tectonic Grafts , 2015, Cornea.

[2]  J. Mehta,et al.  Management of corneal perforation. , 2011, Survey of ophthalmology.

[3]  A. salman,et al.  Visual Outcome and Corneal Topography After Eccentric “Shaped” Corneal Grafts , 2009, Cornea.

[4]  D. Tan,et al.  Compressive C-shaped lamellar keratoplasty: a surgical alternative for the management of severe astigmatism from peripheral corneal degeneration. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Dr. Karl W. Ascher Zur Keratoplastikfrage , 1919, Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für Ophthalmologie.

[6]  F. Gudé,et al.  Amniotic Membrane Transplantation In The Treatment Of Corneal Perforations , 2002 .

[7]  I. Süveges,et al.  Corneal topographic results after eccentric, biconvex penetrating keratoplasty , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  P. Prabhasawat,et al.  Single and multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent corneal epithelial defect with and without stromal thinning and perforation , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Izaguirre Roncal LB,et al.  [Conjunctival flaps in corneal perforations]. , 2000, Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia.

[10]  M. Macsai,et al.  Small-diameter, round, eccentric penetrating keratoplasties and corneal topographic correlation. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Copeland,et al.  Large diameter therapeutic penetrating keratoplasties. , 1989, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[12]  P. Laughrea,et al.  Effect of factors unrelated to tissue matching on corneal transplant endothelial rejection. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  H. K. Soong,et al.  Fistula excision and peripheral grafts in the treatment of persistent limbal wound leaks. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[14]  L. Wilson,et al.  Postoperative astigmatism after central vs eccentric penetrating keratoplasties. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  D. Doughman,et al.  The use of tissue adhesive in corneal perforations. , 1983, Ophthalmology.

[16]  R. Porter,et al.  CORNEAL GRAFT FAILURE , 1978 .

[17]  R. Herberman,et al.  Protection of penetrating corneal allografts from immune rejection. , 1972, American journal of ophthalmology.