Social Innovation in Rural Areas of the European Union Learnings from Neo-Endogenous Development Projects in Italy and Spain

Within the framework of the LEADER approach to rural development applied in rural areas of the European Union, a high degree of social innovation (SI) has been achieved with the support of public–private partnerships. This research analyzes the different forms of SI achieved in specific projects in marginal rural areas facing depopulation. These initiatives make important, sometimes intangible, contributions to rural society, which are not sufficiently valued in rural development practice. Using an exploratory qualitative methodology, we made a selection of projects carried out in rural areas of Spain and Italy by searching for specific keywords (“innovation”, “entrepreneurship”, and “LEADER”) in the European Network of Rural Development database. According to the typology of promoters, we considered Transnational Cooperation Projects promoted by various Local Action Groups (LAGs), by public sector initiative and by private promoters. In-depth interviews were also conducted. The main findings include: the crucial role played by local leaders, social enterprises and LAGs in overcoming resistance and reluctance amongst the local community to participate in and support rural development projects; the importance of creating collective learning processes; the complexity of the network affects the number of contributions; the need for long-term continuity of processes and projects, and the importance of combining exogenous and endogenous development and knowledge.

[1]  A. Knierim,et al.  The emergence of social innovation in rural revitalisation practices: A comparative case study from Taiwan , 2022, Journal of Rural Studies.

[2]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Developing a framework for radical and incremental social innovation in rural areas , 2022, Journal of Rural Studies.

[3]  L. Roșu,et al.  LEADER Program—An Inclusive or Selective Instrument for the Development of Rural Space in Romania? , 2021, Sustainability.

[4]  Catalina Nicolás Martínez,et al.  LEADER una política para la dinamización del emprendimiento rural femenino en Murcia , 2021, Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales.

[5]  A. Tolón‐Becerra,et al.  The out-migration of young people from a region of the “Empty Spain”: Between a constant slump cycle and a pending innovation spiral , 2021, Journal of Rural Studies.

[6]  M. Shucksmith,et al.  Rurality and social innovation processes and outcomes: A realist evaluation of rural social enterprise activities , 2021, Journal of rural studies.

[7]  E. Pisani,et al.  What Are the Impacts of Social Innovation? A Synthetic Review and Case Study of Community Forestry in the Scottish Highlands , 2021 .

[8]  M. Nijnik,et al.  Reconstructive Social Innovation Cycles in Women-Led Initiatives in Rural Areas , 2021 .

[9]  S. Virkkala,et al.  Community-driven social innovation and quadruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten , 2020 .

[10]  Oliver Müller,et al.  Translating the Bottom-Up Frame , 2019, Anthropological Journal on European Cultures.

[11]  Marilena Labianca,et al.  Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period , 2018 .

[12]  Stefan Neumeier,et al.  Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success , 2017 .

[13]  M. Woods,et al.  The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of Its Own Success. The Decline of the Bottom‐Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia , 2016 .

[14]  Krzysztof Janc,et al.  The impact of EU governance and rural development policy on the development of the third sector in rural Poland: A nation-wide analysis , 2016 .

[15]  D. Maye,et al.  The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland , 2016 .

[16]  Thuessen Annette Aagaard,et al.  A Territorial Perspective On Eu´S Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings , 2014 .

[17]  J. Esparcia,et al.  Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects , 2014 .

[18]  T. Marsden Mobilities, Vulnerabilities and Sustainabilities : Exploring Pathways from Denial to Sustainable Rural Development , 2009 .

[19]  Mark Shucksmith,et al.  LEADER and Innovation , 2008 .

[20]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation , 2005 .

[21]  Javier Esparcia Pérez The leader Programme and the Rise of Rural Development in Spain , 2000 .

[22]  T. Dax Enhancing local development through trans-regional cooperation: Lessons from long-term practice of the LEADER concept , 2021 .

[23]  Marilena Labianca,et al.  Social Innovation, Territorial Capital and LEADER Experiences in Andalusia (Spain) and in Molise (Italy) , 2020 .

[24]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas: Results and Lessons , 2020 .

[25]  G. Nemes,et al.  Beyond the New Rural Paradigm : Project state and collective reflexive agency , 2014 .

[26]  S. Neumeier Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? – Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research , 2012 .

[27]  C. Ray Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in the EU , 2006 .