Epistemic Actions in Science Education

Epistemic actions are actions in the physical environment taken with the intent of gathering information or facilitating cognition. As students and geologists explain how they integrated observations from artificial rock outcrops to select the best model of a three-dimensional geological structure, they occasionally take the following actions, which we interpret as epistemic: remove rejected models from the field of view, juxtapose two candidate models, juxtapose and align a candidate model with their sketch map, rotate a candidate model into alignment with the full scale geological structure, and reorder their field notes from a sentential order into a spatial configuration. Our study differs from prior work on epistemic actions in that our participants manipulate spatial representations (models, sketches, maps), rather than non-representational objects. When epistemic actions are applied to representations, the actions can exploit the dual nature of representations by manipulating the physical aspect to enhance the representational aspect.

[1]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Epistemic action increases with skill , 1996 .

[2]  C. Goodwin Practices of Color Classification , 1996 .

[3]  J. Deloache Dual representation and young children's use of scale models. , 2000, Child development.

[4]  L. S. Liben Education for Spatial Thinking , 2007 .

[5]  Kim A. Kastens,et al.  Research in Science Education: The Role of Gestures in Geoscience Teaching and Learning , 2008 .

[6]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[7]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Embodiment is the foundation, not a level , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Spatial Cognition III , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  What baboons, babies and Tetris players tell us about interaction: a biosocial view of norm-based social learning , 2006, Connect. Sci..

[10]  Alex Kirlik,et al.  The Ecological Expert: acting to create information to guide action , 1998, Proceedings Fourth Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems.

[11]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[12]  A. Collins National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[13]  David H. Uttal,et al.  Concreteness and symbolic development , 2006 .

[14]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Embodied Practices of Engineering Work , 2000 .

[15]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Model-Based and Manipulative Abduction in Science , 2004 .

[16]  N. Goodman,et al.  Languages of art : an approach to a theory of symbols , 1979 .

[17]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[18]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Kim A. Kastens,et al.  Locating Oneself on a Map in Relation to Person Qualities and Map Characteristics , 2008, Spatial Cognition.

[20]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Intelligent Use of Space , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[21]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: The bridging function of gestures , 2003 .

[23]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Nancy R. Smith,et al.  Symbolic Functioning in Childhood , 1981 .

[25]  Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda,et al.  Child psychology : a handbook of contemporary issues , 2005 .

[26]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[27]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[28]  Lynn S. Liben,et al.  Understanding Person-Space-Map Relations: Cartographic and Developmental Perspectives. , 1993 .