Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the effects of dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography (CT).Materials and methodsInflated and fixed porcine lungs were scanned with a 64-slice CT system at 10, 20, 40 and 400 mAs. Using automatic exposure control, 40 mAs was chosen as standard dose. Scan data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and ASIR. Image pairs were obtained by factorial combination of images at a selected level. Using a 21-point scale, three experienced radiologists independently rated differences in quality between adjacently displayed paired images for image noise, image sharpness and conspicuity of tiny nodules. A subjective quality score (SQS) for each image was computed based on Anderson’s functional measurement theory. The standard deviation was recorded as a quantitative noise measurement.ResultsAt all doses examined, SQSs improved with ASIR for all evaluation items. No significant differences were noted between the SQSs for 40%-ASIR images obtained at 20 mAs and those for FBP images at 40 mAs.ConclusionCompared to the FBP algorithm, ASIR for lung CT can enable an approximately 50% dose reduction from the standard dose while preserving visualization of small structures.

[1]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[2]  M. L. Rosado de Christenson,et al.  Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Pilot Study , 2012 .

[3]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[4]  T. Yoshizumi,et al.  Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. , 2009, Radiology.

[5]  Giang Nguyen,et al.  A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  E. Robert Heitzman,et al.  The lung, radiologic-pathologic correlations , 1973 .

[7]  A. Colman,et al.  Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Subjective quality assessment of compressed images , 1997, Signal Process..

[9]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[10]  M. Kalra,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Chest Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Initial Experience , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[13]  Donglai Huo,et al.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models. , 2008, Medical physics.

[14]  Noriyuki Tomiyama,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for pulmonary CT: image quality of the cadaveric lung on standard- and reduced-dose CT. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[15]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  Multidimensional Characterization of the Perceptual Quality of Noise-Reduced Computed Tomography Images , 1995, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[16]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[17]  竹本 宜弘 JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) , 1995 .

[18]  N. Anderson Chapter 8 – ALGEBRAIC MODELS IN PERCEPTION* , 1974 .