Explaining the Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology in Developing Countries

In this paper we study the diffusion of non-hydro renewable energy (NHRE) technologies for electricity generation across 108 developing countries between 1980 and 2010. We use two-stage estimation methods to identify the determinants behind the choice of whether or not to adopt NHRE as well as about the amount of electricity to produce from renewable energy sources. We find that NHRE diffusion accelerates with the implementation of economic and regulatory instruments, higher per capita income and schooling levels, and stable, democratic regimes. In contrast, increasing openness and aid, institutional and strategic policy support programs, growth of electricity consumption, and high fossil fuel production appear to delay NHRE diffusion. Furthermore, we find that a diverse energy mix increases the probability of NHRE adoption. Finally, we find a weak support for a positive influence of the Kyoto Protocol on NHRE diffusion and no evidence for any influence resulting from financial sector development.

[1]  Willard G. Manning,et al.  Choosing Between the Sample-Selection Model and the Multi-Part Model , 1984 .

[2]  J. Balsiger,et al.  The Nature and Role of Regional Agreements in International Environmental Politics : Mapping Agreements , Outlining Future , 2012 .

[3]  Nick Johnstone,et al.  Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies on a Global Scale: A Study Drawing on Patent Data , 2009 .

[4]  G. Linders.  Estimation of the Gravity Equation of Bilateral Trade in the Presence of Zero Flows , 2006 .

[5]  Henri L. F. de Groot,et al.  Vested Interest and Resistance to Technology Adoption , 1999 .

[6]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Microeconometrics Using Stata , 2009 .

[7]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress , 1991 .

[8]  Edward C. Norton,et al.  Choosing Between and Interpreting the Heckit and Two-Part Models for Corner Solutions , 2003, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[9]  A. Bank,et al.  The Political Economy of Regional Power: Turkey Under the AKP , 2012 .

[10]  Markus Haller,et al.  Will History Repeat Itself? Economic Convergence and Convergence in Energy Use Patterns , 2012 .

[11]  V. Ruttan.  Technology, Growth, and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective , 2000 .

[12]  D. Popp.  International Technology Transfer, Climate Change, and the Clean Development Mechanism , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[13]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  Policies, Instruments and Cooperative Arrangements , 2007 .

[14]  On Interaction Effects: The Case of Heckit and Two-Part Models , 2012 .

[15]  David Popp,et al.  Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change , 2009 .

[16]  Peter Mulder,et al.  Explaining slow diffusion of energy-saving technologies: a vintage model with returns to diversity and learning-by-using , 2003 .

[17]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[18]  Per Krusell,et al.  Vested Interest In a Positive Theory of Stagnation and Growth , 1996 .

[19]  M. Colombo,et al.  Complementarity and cumulative learning effects in early diffusion of multiple technologies , 1995 .

[20]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities, Momentum, and the Evolution of Modern Manufacturing , 1991 .

[21]  J. Mokyr,et al.  Technological Inertia in Economic History , 1992, The Journal of Economic History.

[22]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Technical change dynamics: evidence from the emerging renewable energy technologies , 2001 .

[23]  C. Brunnschweiler,et al.  Finance for renewable energy: an empirical analysis of developing and transition economies , 2009, Environment and Development Economics.

[24]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Economic Freedom and Growth: Decomposing the Effects , 2002 .

[25]  Henri L. F. de Groot,et al.  Estimation of the Gravity Equation in the Presence of Zero Flows , 2006 .

[26]  A. Owen,et al.  Renewable energy: Externality costs as market barriers , 2006 .

[27]  J. Sturm,et al.  Market-Oriented Institutions and Policies and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey , 2006 .

[28]  S. Destradi,et al.  The Consequences of Failed Mediation in Civil Wars: Assessing the Sri Lankan Case , 2012 .

[29]  M. Glachant,et al.  Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies : A Global Analysis Prepared for the Review of Environmental Economics and Policy , 2010 .

[30]  M. S. Taylor,et al.  Trade, Spatial Separation, and the Environment , 1995 .

[31]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[32]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[33]  Gareth Martin.  Renewable energy and the ODA , 1996 .

[34]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .

[35]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Change , 2002 .

[36]  Yi Feng.  Political Freedom, Political Instability, and Policy Uncertainty: A Study of Political Institutions and Private Investment in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[37]  Ivan Haščič,et al.  Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy , 2011 .

[38]  N. M. Fehr,et al.  Water on Fire: Gains from Electricity Trade , 1997 .

[39]  Manuel Frondel,et al.  Driving for fun? Comparing the effect of fuel prices on weekday and weekend fuel consumption , 2010 .

[40]  J. de Haan,et al.  Governance and Growth Revisited , 2007 .

[41]  Alexander de Juan.  Mapping Political Violence – The Approaches and Conceptual Challenges of Subnational Geospatial Analyses of Intrastate Conflict , 2012 .

[42]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Entry, exit and diffusion with learning by doing , 1989 .

[43]  Peter Mulder,et al.  Rural electrification in an imperfect world: A case study from Mozambique , 2008 .

[44]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. , 1991 .

[45]  Diego Comin,et al.  Cross-Country Technology Adoption: Making the Theories Face the Facts , 2003 .

[46]  Shihti Yu,et al.  On the choice between sample selection and two-part models , 1996 .

[47]  M. Beck,et al.  Political Change in the Middle East: An Attempt to Analyze the 'Arab Spring' , 2012 .

[48]  Yves Balcer,et al.  Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology , 1984 .

[49]  Richard H. Bernhard,et al.  INVESTMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1994, xiv + 468 pp. ISBN 0-69I-034I0-9. List: S39.50. , 1995 .

[50]  José Roberto Moreira,et al.  Renewable energy markets in developing countries , 2003 .

[51]  Raymond J. Kopp,et al.  Energy Resources and Global Development , 2003, Science.

[52]  V. Ruttan.  Technology, Growth, and Development , 2000 .

[53]  D. Gregori,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[54]  Global Energy Assessment Writing Team.  Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[55]  C. Fischer,et al.  International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change , 2008 .

[56]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[57]  B. Raymond.  Polynomially Bounded Rationality , 1994 .

[58]  Alwyn Young.  Substitution and Complementarity in Endogenous Innovation , 1993 .

[59]  M. Pastor,et al.  Private Investment and Democracy in the Developing World , 1995 .

[60]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Optimal Adoption of Complementary Technologies , 2000 .

[61]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[62]  John P. Weyant,et al.  On the sources of technological change: Assessing the evidence , 2006 .

[63]  John Byrne,et al.  An equity- and sustainability-based policy response to global climate change , 1998 .

[64]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[65]  F. Plassmann,et al.  Preferences, Technology, and the Environment: Understanding the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis , 2006 .

[66]  Langche Zeng,et al.  Analyzing Censored and Sample-Selected Data with Tobit and Heckit Models , 1999, Political Analysis.

[67]  Jim Watson,et al.  Sustainable innovation through leapfrogging: a review of the evidence , 2011 .

[68]  P. Stoneman,et al.  The Economics of Technological Diffusion , 2001 .

[69]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Externalities and complementarities in telecommunications dynamics , 1993 .

[70]  X. D. Vanssay,et al.  Freedom and growth: Do constitutions matter? , 1994 .

[71]  Stephen L. Parente.  Technology adoption, learning-by-doing, and economic growth , 1994 .

[72]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[73]  A. Jaffe,et al.  The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology , 1994 .

[74]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technological Change , 1997 .

[75]  A. Bank,et al.  Long-term monarchical survival in the Middle East: a configurational comparison, 1945–2012 , 2015 .

[76]  A. Ciccone,et al.  TRADE AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2006 .

[77]  H. Groot,et al.  Vested interests, population ageing and technology adoption , 2002 .

[78]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda , 2009 .

[79]  P. David,et al.  Technical choice innovation and economic growth , 1975 .

[80]  Peter R. Odell,et al.  Dynamics of energy technologies and global change , 1999 .

[81]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .