Aerodynamic Parameter Adaptation of CFD-Based Reduced-Order Models

The proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method has been shown to produce accurate reduced-order models (ROMs) for unsteady aerodynamic analyses at fixed flight conditions. However, changes in aerodynamic parameters such as the Mach number or angle of attack often necessitate the re-construction of the ROM in order to maintain accuracy, which destroys the sought-after computational eciency. Straightforward approaches to ROM adaptation — such as the global POD method and the direct interpolation of the POD basis vectors — are known to lead to inaccurate POD bases in the transonic flight regime. Alternatively, a new ROM adaptation scheme is described in this paper and evaluated for changes in the free-stream Mach number and/or angle of attack. This scheme interpolates the subspace angles between two POD subspaces, then generates a new POD basis through an orthogonal transformation based on the interpolated subspace angles. The resulting computational methodology is applied to unsteady flows for both aerodynamic and aeroelastic applications involving a complete F-16 configuration in various airstreams. The predicted aerodynamics loads and aeroelastic frequencies and damping coecients are compared with counterparts obtained from full-order nonlinear simulations and flight test data. Good correlations are observed, including in the transonic regime. The obtained computational results reveal a significant potential of the adapted ROM computational technology for accurate, near-real-time, numerical, predictions.

[1]  Ryan F. Schmit,et al.  Improvements in low dimensional tools for flow-structure interaction problems: Using global POD , 2003 .

[2]  E Raveh Daniella,et al.  Development of Unsteady Aerodynamic State-Space Models From CFD-Based Pulse Responses , 2001 .

[3]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Mach Number Influence on Reduced-Order Models of Inviscid Potential Flows in Turbomachinery , 2002 .

[4]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Prediction of Nonlinear Panel Response Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2001 .

[5]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  CFD-Based Aeroelastic Eigensolver for the Subsonic, Transonic, and Supersonic Regimes , 2001 .

[6]  Jonathan W. Naughton,et al.  Initial Studies of Low-Order Turbulence Modeling of the Wind Turbine In-Flow Environment , 2004 .

[7]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Adaptation of POD-based Aeroelastic ROMs for Varying Mach Number and Angle of Attack: Application to a Complete F-16 Configuration , 2005 .

[8]  J. Peraire,et al.  Balanced Model Reduction via the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2002 .

[9]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  POD-based Aeroelastic Analysis of a Complete F-16 Configuration: ROM Adaptation and Demonstration , 2005 .

[10]  Philip S. Beran,et al.  Reduced-order modeling - New approaches for computational physics , 2001 .

[11]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Aeroelastic Dynamic Analysis of a Full F-16 Configuration for Various Flight Conditions , 2003 .

[12]  W. Rodden,et al.  A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. , 1969 .

[13]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Three-Dimensional Transonic Aeroelasticity Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition-Based Reduced-Order Models , 2001 .

[14]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  An optimal reduced-order aeroelasltic modeling based on a response-based modal analysis of unsteady CFD models , 2001 .

[15]  L. Peterson,et al.  Improved exponential time series approximation of unsteady aerodynamic operators , 1988 .

[16]  Gregory W. Brown,et al.  Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid–structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter , 2003 .

[17]  P. Tallec,et al.  Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: Momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity , 1998 .

[18]  P. Holmes,et al.  Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry , 1996 .

[19]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small-disturbance flows using a frequency-domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique , 1999 .

[20]  Holt Ashley,et al.  Piston Theory-A New Aerodynamic Tool for the Aeroelastician , 1956 .

[21]  Taehyoun Kim,et al.  Frequency-Domain Karhunen -Loeve Method and Its Application to Linear Dynamic Systems , 1998 .

[22]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces , 1971, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[23]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Reduced-order fluid/structure modeling of a complete aircraft configuration , 2006 .

[24]  K. Karhunen Zur Spektraltheorie stochastischer prozesse , 1946 .

[25]  Mark N. Glauser,et al.  Towards practical flow sensing and control via POD and LSE based low-dimensional tools , 2004 .

[26]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A linearized method for the frequency analysis of three-dimensional fluid/structure interaction problems in all flow regimes , 2001 .

[27]  Thuan Lieu Adaptation of reduced order models for applications in aeroelasticity , 2004 .

[28]  Michael C. Romanowski Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic models using Karhunen-Loeve eigenmodes , 1996 .

[29]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique for Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows , 2000 .

[30]  Michel Lesoinne,et al.  Parameter Adaptation of Reduced Order Models for Three-Dimensional Flutter Analysis , 2004 .

[31]  Bogdan I. Epureanu,et al.  A parametric analysis of reduced order models of viscous flows in turbomachinery , 2003 .

[32]  D. Liu,et al.  State-of-the-art of unsteady aerodynamics for high performance aircraft , 2001 .

[33]  Paul G. A. Cizmas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition of Turbine Rotor-Stator Interaction , 2003 .