Alternative tissue engineering scaffolds based on starch: processing methodologies, morphology, degradation and mechanical properties

Abstract An ideal tissue engineering scaffold must be designed from a polymer with an adequate degradation rate. The processing technique must allow for the preparation of 3-D scaffolds with controlled porosity and adequate pore sizes, as well as tissue matching mechanical properties and an appropriate biological response. This communication revises recent work that has been developed in our laboratories with the aim of producing 3-D polymeric structures (from starch-based blends) with adequate properties to be used as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Several processing methodologies were originally developed and optimised. Some of these methodologies were based on conventional melt-based processing routes, such as extrusion using blowing agents (BA) and compression moulding (combined with particulate leaching). Other developed technologies included solvent casting and particle leaching and an innovative in situ polymerization method. By means of using the described methodologies, it is possible to tailor the properties of the different scaffolds, namely their degradation, morphology and mechanical properties, for several applications in tissue engineering. Furthermore, the processing methodologies (including the blowing agents used in the melt-based technologies) described above do not affect the biocompatible behaviour of starch-based polymers. Therefore, scaffolds obtained from these materials by means of using one of the described methodologies may constitute an important alternative to the materials currently used in tissue engineering.

[1]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Culture of organized cell communities. , 1998, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[2]  T. Park,et al.  A novel fabrication method of macroporous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using gas foaming salt as a porogen additive. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  J M Powers,et al.  Fabrication of biodegradable polymer scaffolds to engineer trabecular bone. , 1995, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[4]  M S Chapekar,et al.  Tissue engineering: challenges and opportunities. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  A. Mikos,et al.  Injectable biodegradable polymer composites based on poly(propylene fumarate) crosslinked with poly(ethylene glycol)-dimethacrylate. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[6]  A. Mikos,et al.  The Importance of New Processing Techniques in Tissue Engineering , 1996, MRS bulletin.

[7]  M. Sittinger,et al.  Tissue engineering: generation of differentiated artificial tissues for biomedical applications , 1997, Cell and Tissue Research.

[8]  C. Vacanti,et al.  An overview of tissue engineered bone. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering : Frontiers in biotechnology , 1993 .

[10]  Hyun D Kim,et al.  Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2-Coated Porous Poly-L-lactic Acid Scaffolds: Release Kinetics and Induction of Pluripotent C3H10T1/2 Cells , 1998 .

[11]  A. Mikos,et al.  Injectable biodegradable materials for orthopedic tissue engineering. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[12]  K. Anseth,et al.  A review of photocrosslinked polyanhydrides: in situ forming degradable networks. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[13]  R. Langer,et al.  Selected advances in drug delivery and tissue engineering. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[14]  G Ciardelli,et al.  Degradable and highly porous polyesterurethane foam as biomaterial: effects and phagocytosis of degradation products in osteoblasts. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  D J Mooney,et al.  Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. , 1998, Trends in biotechnology.

[16]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[17]  H Planck,et al.  Cartilage reconstruction in head and neck surgery: comparison of resorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering of human septal cartilage. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  CHAPTER 21 – POLYMER SCAFFOLD PROCESSING , 2000 .

[19]  Dietmar W. Hutmacher,et al.  Engineering research : The engineer's role , 2000 .

[20]  K E Healy,et al.  Engineering bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel microarchitecture. , 1999, Tissue engineering.

[21]  Rui L Reis,et al.  New partially degradable and bioactive acrylic bone cements based on starch blends and ceramic fillers. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[22]  Antonios G. Mikos,et al.  Biodegradable polymer scaffolds to regenerate organs , 1995 .

[23]  Kyriacos A. Athanasiou,et al.  Biodegradable PLA-PGA Polymers for Tissue Engineering in Orthopaedics , 1997 .

[24]  P. Ma,et al.  Poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite porous composites for bone-tissue engineering. I. Preparation and morphology. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering. , 1993, Science.

[26]  P. Tresco,et al.  Substrate-bound human recombinant L1 selectively promotes neuronal attachment and outgrowth in the presence of astrocytes and fibroblasts. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[27]  Robert Langer,et al.  Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 1994, Bio/Technology.

[28]  J C Middleton,et al.  Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[29]  R L Reis,et al.  Cytocompatibility and response of osteoblastic-like cells to starch-based polymers: effect of several additives and processing conditions. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[30]  D W Hutmacher,et al.  Tissue engineering research: the engineer's role. , 2000, Medical device technology.

[31]  E. Pişkin Biomaterials in Different Forms for Tissue Engineering: An Overview , 1997 .