The AMP-Foot 2.1 : actuator design, control and experiments with an amputee

SUMMARY The Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2 is a new energy efficient, powered transtibial prosthesis mimicking intact ankle behavior. The author's research is focused on the use of a low power actuator which stores energy in springs during the complete stance phase. At push-off, this energy can be released hereby providing propulsion forces and torques to the amputee. With the use of the so-called catapult actuator, the size and weight of the drive can be decreased compared to state-of-the-art powered prostheses, while still providing the full power necessary for walking. In this article, the authors present a detailed description of the catapult actuator followed by a comparison with existing actuator technology in powered prosthetic feet with regard to torque and power requirements. The implication on the actuator's design will then be outlined. Further, a description of the control strategy behind the AMP-Foot 2 and 2.1 will be given. In the last section of the article, the actuation principle and control are illustrated by experimental validation with a transfemoral amputee. Conclusions and future work complete the paper.

[1]  Long Wang,et al.  On the Design of a Powered Transtibial Prosthesis With Stiffness Adaptable Ankle and Toe Joints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Design and Validation of the Ankle Mimicking Prosthetic (AMP-) Foot 2.0 , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Realizing the Promise of Robotic Leg Prostheses , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[5]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Concept of a Series-Parallel Elastic Actuator for a Powered Transtibial Prosthesis , 2013 .

[6]  Long Wang,et al.  A fuzzy logic based terrain identification approach to prosthesis control using multi-sensor fusion , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Passive Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Prototype with Extended Push-Off , 2013 .

[8]  Michael Mitchell,et al.  Design and development of ankle-foot prosthesis with delayed release of plantarflexion. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Linas A Bieliauskas,et al.  Report of traumatic brain injury information sources among OIF/OEF Veterans undergoing polytrauma evaluations. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  Panagiotis Artemiadis,et al.  EMG-based Robot Control Interfaces: Past, Present and Future , 2012, ICRA 2012.

[11]  Sethu Vijayakumar,et al.  Optimal variable stiffness control: formulation and application to explosive movement tasks , 2012, Auton. Robots.

[12]  D. F. B. Haeufle,et al.  A clutched parallel elastic actuator concept: Towards energy efficient powered legs in prosthetics and robotics , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[13]  André Seyfarth,et al.  A comparison of parallel- and series elastic elements in an actuator for mimicking human ankle joint in walking and running , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Optimality principles in variable stiffness control: The VSA hammer , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  André Seyfarth,et al.  Stiffness adjustment of a Series Elastic Actuator in an ankle-foot prosthesis for walking and running: The trade-off between energy and peak power optimization , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  An energy efficient knee locking mechanism for a dynamically walking robot , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  An Active Foot-Ankle Prosthesis With Biomechanical Energy Regeneration , 2010 .

[18]  Hartmut Geyer,et al.  Control of a Powered Ankle–Foot Prosthesis Based on a Neuromuscular Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Kick it with elasticity: Safety and performance in human-robot soccer , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  MACCEPA 2.0: Adjustable compliant actuator with stiffening characteristic for energy efficient hopping , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  Prosthetic ankle-foot mechanism capable of automatic adaptation to the walking surface. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered Ankle--Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[23]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Prosthetic feet: State-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle–foot biomechanics , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[24]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  A biomechatronical transtibial prosthesis powered by pleated pneumatic artificial muscles , 2008, Int. J. Model. Identif. Control..

[25]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[26]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[27]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  M. Cornwall Prosthetics and Patient Management: A Comprehensive Clinical Approach , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[29]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Second generation pleated pneumatic artificial muscle and its robotic applications , 2006, Adv. Robotics.

[30]  te Riele,et al.  The HEELfoot : design of a plantarflexing prosthetic foot , 2003 .

[31]  Thomas G. Sugar A novel selective compliant actuator , 2002 .

[32]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[33]  E L Bontrager,et al.  Segment velocities in normal and transtibial amputees: prosthetic design implications. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  M. Lader,et al.  Current Controversies in the Anxiety Disorders , 1996 .

[35]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[36]  R. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[37]  J. Bowker,et al.  Atlas of Limb Prosthetics: Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles , 1992 .

[38]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTHETIC FEET ON BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEE WALKING , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.