The two phase flow parametric study on the air induction nozzle is presented with water and air as working fluid where liquid was supplied at the pre-orifice with various inlet pressures ranged from 3 to 6 bar. The interaction between air and water at molecular level at the orifice exit leads to forming a strong shear layer intensified with increase in inlet pressure. Mean diameter and void fraction in each bubble and their individual shapes is adjusted prior to the desired criteria. Thus, it is vital to regulate the ratio of intake air to the supplied liquid so that the generated micro bubbles fit the design criteria. CFD analysis was accompanied via commercial software STAR CCM+ from cd-adapco and validated against experimental data to find the most appropriate turbulence model. Then, the chosen model is used to investigate design parameters and their effect on the desired parameters. A volume of fluid (VOF) method of RANS models used to undertake the air-water interaction. Results of such comparison revealed minor priority of the Realizable k-ε to the k-ω model. In addition, the unsteady state solution presented remarkable predictions in compare to that of steady state solution in particular predicting air behaviour.
[1]
M. C. Butler Ellis,et al.
PM—Power and Machinery: Design Factors affecting Spray Characteristics and Drift Performance of Air Induction Nozzles
,
2002
.
[2]
M. B. Ellis,et al.
Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers
,
2000
.
[3]
Jim Hanan,et al.
A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles
,
2013
.
[4]
Changyun Wen,et al.
Numerical investigation of geometry parameters for design of high performance ejectors
,
2009
.
[5]
F. Menter.
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications
,
1994
.
[6]
Lei Wang,et al.
Configuration dependence and optimization of the entrainment performance for gas–gas and gas–liquid ejectors
,
2012
.
[7]
Ashwin W. Patwardhan,et al.
Hydrodynamic aspects of ejectors
,
2005
.
[8]
Randheer L. Yadav,et al.
Design aspects of ejectors: Effects of suction chamber geometry
,
2008
.