Treatment of geometric singularities in implicit solvent models.

Geometric singularities, such as cusps and self-intersecting surfaces, are major obstacles to the accuracy, convergence, and stability of the numerical solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) equation. In earlier work, an interface technique based PB solver was developed using the matched interface and boundary (MIB) method, which explicitly enforces the flux jump condition at the solvent-solute interfaces and leads to highly accurate biomolecular electrostatics in continuum electric environments. However, such a PB solver, denoted as MIBPB-I, cannot maintain the designed second order convergence whenever there are geometric singularities, such as cusps and self-intersecting surfaces. Moreover, the matrix of the MIBPB-I is not optimally symmetrical, resulting in the convergence difficulty. The present work presents a new interface method based PB solver, denoted as MIBPB-II, to address the aforementioned problems. The present MIBPB-II solver is systematical and robust in treating geometric singularities and delivers second order convergence for arbitrarily complex molecular surfaces of proteins. A new procedure is introduced to make the MIBPB-II matrix optimally symmetrical and diagonally dominant. The MIBPB-II solver is extensively validated by the molecular surfaces of few-atom systems and a set of 24 proteins. Converged electrostatic potentials and solvation free energies are obtained at a coarse grid spacing of 0.5 A and are considerably more accurate than those obtained by the PBEQ and the APBS at finer grid spacings.

[1]  R. LeVeque,et al.  A comparison of the extended finite element method with the immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources , 2006 .

[2]  Peijuan Zhu,et al.  Implementation and testing of stable, fast implicit solvation in molecular dynamics using the smooth‐permittivity finite difference Poisson–Boltzmann method , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[3]  Guo-Wei Wei,et al.  Matched interface and boundary (MIB) method for elliptic problems with sharp-edged interfaces , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[4]  W. Im,et al.  Continuum solvation model: Computation of electrostatic forces from numerical solutions to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation , 1998 .

[5]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE NONLINEAR POISSON-BOLTZMANN EQUATION FOR A MEMBRANE-ELECTROLYTE SYSTEM , 1994 .

[6]  Marcia O. Fenley,et al.  Hybrid boundary element and finite difference method for solving the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  J. Warwicker,et al.  Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Valentin Gogonea,et al.  Implementation of the solvent effect in molecular mechanics. 1. Model development and analytical algorithm for the solvent-accessible surface area , 1994 .

[9]  R. Zauhar,et al.  A new method for computing the macromolecular electric potential. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[11]  B. Roux,et al.  Implicit solvent models. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[12]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Numerical solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation using tetrahedral finite‐element meshes , 1997 .

[13]  Wei Zu Chen,et al.  Protein molecular dynamics with electrostatic force entirely determined by a single Poisson‐Boltzmann calculation , 2002, Proteins.

[14]  Jim Warwicker,et al.  Improved pKa calculations through flexibility based sampling of a water‐dominated interaction scheme , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  Marcia O. Fenley,et al.  Fast Boundary Element Method for the Linear Poisson-Boltzmann Equation , 2002 .

[16]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[17]  Ray Luo,et al.  Accelerated Poisson–Boltzmann calculations for static and dynamic systems , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  K. Sharp,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. , 1990, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[19]  Federico Fogolari,et al.  Protocol for MM/PBSA molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[20]  Ray Luo,et al.  A Poisson–Boltzmann dynamics method with nonperiodic boundary condition , 2003 .

[21]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Adaptive multilevel finite element solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation I. Algorithms and examples , 2000 .

[22]  Shan Zhao,et al.  High order matched interface and boundary method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  H. Berendsen,et al.  The electric potential of a macromolecule in a solvent: A fundamental approach , 1991 .

[24]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  J. Mccammon,et al.  On the evaluation and optimization of protein X‐ray structures for pKa calculations , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  S. Osher,et al.  A Non-oscillatory Eulerian Approach to Interfaces in Multimaterial Flows (the Ghost Fluid Method) , 1999 .

[27]  S Subramaniam,et al.  Computation of molecular electrostatics with boundary element methods. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Shan Zhao,et al.  High-order FDTD methods via derivative matching for Maxwell's equations with material interfaces , 2004 .

[29]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[30]  Ivo Babuska,et al.  The finite element method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients , 1970, Computing.

[31]  A. Mayo The Fast Solution of Poisson’s and the Biharmonic Equations on Irregular Regions , 1984 .

[32]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Theory of Solutions of Molecules Containing Widely Separated Charges with Special Application to Zwitterions , 1934 .

[33]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions† , 2001 .

[34]  Barry Honig,et al.  Focusing of electric fields in the active site of Cu‐Zn superoxide dismutase: Effects of ionic strength and amino‐acid modification , 1986, Proteins.

[35]  P. E. Dyshlovenko Adaptive numerical method for Poisson-Boltzmann equation and its application , 2002 .

[36]  L. R. Scott,et al.  Electrostatics and diffusion of molecules in solution: simulations with the University of Houston Brownian dynamics program , 1995 .

[37]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[38]  E. Alexov,et al.  Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pK(a)s in proteins. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[39]  P. Koehl Electrostatics calculations: latest methodological advances. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  C. Peskin Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1977 .

[41]  C. Brooks,et al.  Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  Richard H. Henchman,et al.  Revisiting free energy calculations: a theoretical connection to MM/PBSA and direct calculation of the association free energy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Frank Eisenhaber,et al.  Improved strategy in analytic surface calculation for molecular systems: Handling of singularities and computational efficiency , 1993, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  Michael J. Holst,et al.  Multigrid solution of the Poisson—Boltzmann equation , 1992, J. Comput. Chem..

[46]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Limitations of atom-centered dielectric functions in implicit solvent models. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[47]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  An automatic three‐dimensional finite element mesh generation system for the Poisson–Boltzmann equation , 1997 .

[49]  Guo-Wei Wei,et al.  On the fictitious-domain and interpolation formulations of the matched interface and boundary (MIB) method , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[50]  Michael L. Connolly,et al.  Molecular surface Triangulation , 1985 .

[51]  Michael J. Holst,et al.  The adaptive multilevel finite element solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation on massively parallel computers , 2001, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[52]  Andrew J. Bordner,et al.  Boundary element solution of the linear Poisson–Boltzmann equation and a multipole method for the rapid calculation of forces on macromolecules in solution , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[53]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Improving implicit solvent simulations: a Poisson-centric view. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[54]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  Electrostatics in computational protein design. , 2005, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[55]  Xu-dong Liu,et al.  A numerical method for solving variable coefficient elliptic equation with interfaces , 2005 .

[56]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.