Effect of group walking traffic on dynamic properties of pedestrian structures

The increasing number of reported vibration serviceability problems in newly built pedestrian structures, such as footbridges and floors, under walking load has attracted considerable attention in the civil engineering community over the past two decades. The key design challenges are: the inter- and intra-subject variability of walking people, the unknown mechanisms of their interaction with the vibrating walking surfaces and the synchronisation between individuals in a group. Ignoring all or some of these factors makes the current design methods an inconsistent approximation of reality. This often leads to considerable over- or under-estimation of the structural response, yielding an unreliable assessment of vibration performance. Changes to the dynamic properties of an empty structure due to the presence of stationary people have been studied extensively over the past two decades. The understanding of the similar effect of walking people on laterally swaying bridges has improved tremendously in the past decade, due to considerable research prompted by the Millennium Bridge problem. However, there is currently a gap in knowledge about how moving pedestrians affect the dynamic properties of vertically vibrating structures. The key reason for this gap is the scarcity of credible experimental data pertinent to moving pedestrians on vertically vibrating structures, especially for multi-pedestrian traffic. This paper addresses this problem by studying the dynamic properties of the combined human-structure system, i.e. occupied structure damping ratio, natural frequency and modal mass. This was achieved using a comprehensive set of frequency response function records, measured on a full-scale test structure, which was occupied by various numbers of moving pedestrians under different walking scenarios. Contrary to expectations, it was found that the natural frequency of the joint moving human-structure system was higher than that of the empty structure, while it was lower when the same people were standing still. The damping ratio of the joint human-structure system was considerably higher than that of the empty structure for both the walking and standing people – in agreement with previous reports for stationary people - and was more prominent for larger groups. Interestingly, it was found that the walking human-structure system has more damping compared with the equivalent standing human-structure system. The properties of a single degree of freedom mass-spring-damper system representing a moving crowd needed to replicate these observations have been identified.

[1]  Michael Willford Dynamic actions and reactions of pedestrians , 2002 .

[2]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Reproduction and application of human bouncing and jumping forces from visual marker data , 2010 .

[3]  Roberto Leal Pimentel Vibrational performance of pedestrian bridges due to human-induced loads. , 1997 .

[4]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Pedestrian Bridge Vibration Serviceability: A Case Study in Testing and Simulation , 2010 .

[5]  Cheon-Hong Min,et al.  Direct identification of non-proportional modal damping matrix for lumped mass system using modal parameters , 2012 .

[6]  Regina Sachse The influences of human occupants on the dynamic properties of slender structures , 2003 .

[7]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[8]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Experimental identification and analytical modelling of human walking forces: Literature review , 2009 .

[9]  Jun Chen,et al.  SMD Model Parameters of Pedestrians for Vertical Human-Structure Interaction , 2015 .

[10]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[11]  Eli Isakov,et al.  Constant and variable stiffness and damping of the leg joints in human hopping. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Mikhail S. Blanter,et al.  Internal Friction in Metallic Materials: A Handbook , 2010 .

[13]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Influence of walking and standing crowds on structural dynamic properties , 2009 .

[14]  A. Ebrahimpour,et al.  Design Live Loads for Crowds in Motion , 1996 .

[15]  Edward Ott,et al.  Theoretical mechanics: crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge. , 2005 .

[17]  Paul Reynolds,et al.  Human-Structure Dynamic Interaction in Civil Engineering Dynamics: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[18]  A JonesChristopher,et al.  Verification of equivalent mass–spring–damper models for crowd–structure vibration response prediction , 2011 .

[19]  Stana Živanović,et al.  Modeling Spatially Unrestricted Pedestrian Traffic on Footbridges , 2010 .

[20]  Jeremy F. Burn,et al.  Biomechanically Inspired Modeling of Pedestrian-Induced Vertical Self-Excited Forces , 2013 .

[21]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF THE STANDING HUMAN BODY EXPOSED TO VERTICAL VIBRATION: INFLUENCE OF POSTURE AND VIBRATION MAGNITUDE , 1998 .

[22]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Determinants of the center of mass trajectory in human walking and running. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Modern facilities for experimental measurement of dynamic loads induced by humans: A literature review , 2013 .

[24]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Using MSD Model to Simulate Human-Structure Interaction During Walking , 2013 .

[25]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  LONG SPAN STEEL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AT SINGAPORE CHANGI AIRPORT - PART 2: CROWD LOADING TESTS AND VIBRATION MITIGATION MEASURES , 2004 .

[26]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Erfan Shahabpoor Dynamic interaction of walking humans with pedestrian structures in vertical direction experimentally based probabilistic modelling , 2014 .

[28]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Current Pedestrian Traffic Models on Structures , 2012 .

[29]  Joan Lasenby,et al.  Section model tests on human – structure lock-in , 2002 .

[30]  G.A. Bertos,et al.  The vertical mechanical impedance of the locomotor system during human walking with applications in rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..