Is spoken duration a sufficient explanation of the word length effect?

The word length effect is one of the cornerstones of trace decay plus rehearsal models (TDR) of memory. Words of long spoken duration take longer to rehearse than words of short spoken duration and as such suffer more decay and are thus less well recalled. The current experiment manipulates both syllable length and spoken duration within words of fixed syllable length in an aim to test the assumptions of the TDR model. Our procedures produced robust effects of both syllable length and spoken duration in four measures of the time it takes to pronounce the different types of words. Serial recall for the same materials produced robust syllable effects, but no duration effects.

[1]  I Neath,et al.  Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  H. Cheung,et al.  Verbal short-term memory as an articulatory system: Evidence from an alternative paradigm , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  N. Cowan,et al.  Is There a Temporal Basis of the Word Length Effect? A Response to Service (1998) , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  J. S. Nairne Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  G. Waters,et al.  Articulatory and Phonological Determinants of Word Length Effects in Span Tasks , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory. , 1992 .

[7]  S. E. Avons,et al.  Output Decay in Immediate Serial Recall: Speech Time Revisited ☆ , 2002 .

[8]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. , 1990 .

[9]  R. Schweickert,et al.  Phonological Similarity, Pronunciation Rate, and Memory Span , 1990 .

[10]  V. Coltheart,et al.  Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: Effects of phonological similarity and word length , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Michael Friendly,et al.  The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words , 1982 .

[12]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Word length and the structure of short-term memory , 1975 .

[13]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: Building a DOG from a DART, a mop, and a FIG , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[14]  S E Avons,et al.  The Word-length Effect and Disyllabic Words , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Modeling Item Length Effects in Memory Span: No Rehearsal Needed? , 1995 .