Revealing the potential of spectral and textural predictor variables in a neural network-based rainfall retrieval technique

ABSTRACT Estimating rainfall areas and rates from geostationary satellite images has the opportunity of both, a high spatial and a high temporal resolution which cannot be achieved by other satellite-based systems until now. Most recent retrieval techniques are solely based on spectral channels of the satellites. These retrievals can be classified as ‘purely pixel-based’ because no information about the neighbourhood pixels is included. Assuming that precipitation is highly correlated with cloud processes and therefore with cloud texture, textural information derived from the neighbourhood of a pixel might give valuable information about the cloud type and hence about a respective probability of the rainfall rate. To study the potential of textural variables to improve optical rainfall retrieval techniques, rainfall areas and rainfall rates were estimated over Germany for the year 2010 using a neural network approach. In addition to the spectral predictor variables from Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), different Grey Level Co-occurance Matrix (GLCM) based textural variables were calculated from all MSG channels. Using recursive feature selection, models were trained and their performance was compared to spectral-only models. Contrary to the expectations, the performance of the models did not increase when textural information was included.

[1]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  Aixia Guo,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2014 .

[3]  Catherine Prigent,et al.  Precipitation retrieval from space: An overview , 2010 .

[4]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1997 .

[5]  Boualem Haddad,et al.  Artificial intelligence systems for rainy areas detection and convective cells' delineation for the south shore of Mediterranean Sea during day and nighttime using MSG satellite images , 2016 .

[6]  Johannes Schmetz,et al.  Precipitation estimations from geostationary orbit and prospects for METEOSAT Second Generation , 2001 .

[7]  Donny M. A. Aminou,et al.  Characteristics of the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) radiometer/imager: SEVIRI , 1997, Remote Sensing.

[8]  PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION BASED ON SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES OF METEOSAT MULTISPECTRAL INFRARED DATA , 2012 .

[9]  Y. Hong,et al.  Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Imagery Using an Artificial Neural Network Cloud Classification System , 2004 .

[10]  G. Visconti,et al.  A Neural Network Approach to Real-Time Rainfall Estimation for Africa Using Satellite Data , 2003 .

[11]  B. J. Conway,et al.  Delineation of precipitation areas from MODIS visible and infrared imagery with artificial neural networks , 2005 .

[12]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[13]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  A study in machine learning from imbalanced data for sentence boundary detection in speech , 2006, Comput. Speech Lang..

[14]  Zhao-Liang Li,et al.  Analysis and Application of the Relationship between Cumulonimbus (Cb) Cloud Features and Precipitation Based on FY-2C Image , 2014, ATMOS 2014.

[15]  Jörg Bendix,et al.  Discriminating raining from non-raining clouds at mid-latitudes using meteosat second generation daytime data , 2007 .

[16]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Feature extraction using auto-associative neural networks , 2004 .

[17]  Alexandros G. Charalambides,et al.  Equipment and methodologies for cloud detection and classification: A review , 2013 .

[18]  Tim Appelhans,et al.  Precipitation Estimates from MSG SEVIRI Daytime, Nighttime, and Twilight Data with Random Forests , 2014 .

[19]  A. Gruber,et al.  GOES Multispectral Rainfall Algorithm (GMSRA) , 2001 .

[20]  S. Ameur,et al.  Cloud classification using the textural features of Meteosat images , 2004 .

[21]  Lutz Hamel,et al.  Model Assessment with ROC Curves , 2009, Encyclopedia of Data Warehousing and Mining.

[22]  Thomas Nauss,et al.  Discriminating raining from non-raining clouds at mid-latitudes using multispectral satellite data , 2006 .

[23]  S. K. Sengupta,et al.  Cloud field classification based upon high spatial resolution textural features: 1. Gray level co‐occurrence matrix approach , 1988 .

[24]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Applied Predictive Modeling , 2013 .

[25]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[26]  M. Gevrey,et al.  Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models , 2003 .

[27]  Jörg Bendix,et al.  Precipitation process and rainfall intensity differentiation using Meteosat Second Generation Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager data , 2008 .

[28]  M. Lazri,et al.  Instantaneous rainfall estimation using neural network from multispectral observations of SEVIRI radiometer and its application in estimation of daily and monthly rainfall , 2014 .

[29]  V. Levizzani,et al.  Status of satellite precipitation retrievals , 2009 .

[30]  Tim Appelhans,et al.  Comparison of four machine learning algorithms for their applicability in satellite-based optical rainfall retrievals , 2015 .

[31]  Michael Uddstrom,et al.  Satellite Cloud Classification and Rain-Rate Estimation Using Multispectral Radiances and Measures of Spatial Texture , 1996 .

[32]  Haralambos Feidas,et al.  Classifying convective and stratiform rain using multispectral infrared Meteosat Second Generation satellite data , 2011, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[33]  H. Feidas,et al.  DETECTION OF RAINY CLOUDS BASED ON THEIR SPECTRAL AND TEXTURAL FEATURES ON METEOSAT MULTISPECTRAL INFRARED DATA , 2011 .

[34]  H. Feidas,et al.  Classification of convective and stratiform rain based on the spectral and textural features of Meteosat Second Generation infrared data , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[35]  Max Kuhn,et al.  caret: Classification and Regression Training , 2015 .

[36]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[37]  Tim Appelhans,et al.  Improving the accuracy of rainfall rates from optical satellite sensors with machine learning — A random forests-based approach applied to MSG SEVIRI , 2014 .

[38]  Pierre Roudier,et al.  Mapping Daily Air Temperature for Antarctica Based on MODIS LST , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[39]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  PERSIANN-MSA: A Precipitation Estimation Method from Satellite-Based Multispectral Analysis , 2009 .

[40]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Evaluating the Utility of Multispectral Information in Delineating the Areal Extent of Precipitation , 2009 .

[41]  F. Marzano,et al.  Artificial neural-network technique for precipitation nowcasting from satellite imagery , 2006 .

[42]  Silas C. Michaelides,et al.  Multifeature texture analysis for the classification of clouds in satellite imagery , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[43]  G. H. Rosenfield,et al.  A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. , 1986 .

[44]  Francesco Meneguzzo,et al.  A Review of Satellite-based Rainfall Estimation , 2002 .

[45]  Jörg Bendix,et al.  Satellite based remote sensing of weather and climate: recent achievements and future perspectives , 2011 .