Correcting brightness gradients in hyperspectral data from urban areas

Abstract The analysis of airborne hyperspectral data is often affected by brightness gradients that are caused by directional surface reflectance. For line scanners these gradients occur in across-track direction and depend on the sensor's view-angle. They are greatest whenever the flight path is perpendicular to the sun–target–observer plane. A common way to correct these gradients is to normalize the reflectance factors to nadir view. This is especially complicated for data from spatially and spectrally heterogeneous urban areas and requires surface type specific models. This paper presents a class-wise empirical approach that is adapted to meet the needs of such images. Within this class-wise approach, empirical models are fit to the brightness gradients of spectrally pure pixels from classes after a spectral angle mapping (SAM). Compensation factors resulting from these models are then assigned to all pixels of the image, both in a discrete manner according the SAM and in a weighted manner based on information from the SAM rule images. The latter scheme is designed in consideration of the great number of mixed pixels. The method is tested on data from the Hyperspectral Mapper (HyMap) that was acquired over Berlin, Germany. It proves superior to a common global approach based on a thorough assessment using a second HyMap image as reference. The weighted assignment of compensation factors is adequate for the correction of areas that are characterized by mixed pixels. A remainder of the original brightness gradient cannot be found in the corrected image, which can then be used for any subsequent qualitative and quantitative analyses. Thus, the proposed method enables the comparison and composition of airborne data sets with similar recording conditions and does not require additional field or laboratory measurements.

[1]  J. Privette,et al.  Inversion methods for physically‐based models , 2000 .

[2]  K. Itten,et al.  Radiative transfer modeling within a heterogeneous canopy for estimation of forest fire fuel properties , 2004 .

[3]  David P. Miller,et al.  Status of atmospheric correction using a MODTRAN4-based algorithm , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  N. Goel Models of vegetation canopy reflectance and their use in estimation of biophysical parameters from reflectance data , 1988 .

[5]  C. Bacour,et al.  Comparison of four radiative transfer models to simulate plant canopies reflectance: direct and inverse mode. , 2000 .

[6]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis , 2003 .

[7]  R. Welch,et al.  Spatial resolution requirements for urban studies , 1982 .

[8]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[9]  G. Campbell,et al.  Simple equation to approximate the bidirectional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. , 1985, Applied optics.

[10]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jean-Louis Roujean,et al.  Sun and view angle corrections on reflectances derived from NOAA/AVHRR data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  D. Kimes Dynamics of directional reflectance factor distributions for vegetation canopies. , 1983, Applied optics.

[13]  Ghassem R. Asrar,et al.  Theory and applications of optical remote sensing. , 1989 .

[14]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[15]  Eyal Ben-Dor,et al.  A NEW MODEL-DRIVEN CORRECTION FACTOR FOR BRDF EFFECTS IN HRS DATA , 2005 .

[16]  Martin Herold,et al.  Spectral resolution requirements for mapping urban areas , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Mark Chopping,et al.  Testing a LiSK BRDF Model with in Situ Bidirectional Reflectance Factor Measurements over Semiarid Grasslands , 2000 .

[18]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Uniqueness of multiangular measurements. I. An indicator of subpixel surface heterogeneity from MISR , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Spectrometry for urban area remote sensing—Development and analysis of a spectral library from 350 to 2400 nm , 2004 .

[20]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Validation of Kernel-Driven Semiempirical Models for the Surface Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function of Land Surfaces , 1997 .

[21]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Empirical methods to compensate for a view-angle-dependent brightness gradient in AVIRIS imagery☆ , 1997 .

[22]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Physical Mechanisms in Hyperspectral BRDF Data of Grass and Watercress , 1998 .

[23]  A. Strahler,et al.  On the derivation of kernels for kernel‐driven models of bidirectional reflectance , 1995 .

[24]  W. Verhoef Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modelling: The SAIL model , 1984 .

[25]  F. Bonn,et al.  Evaluation and correction of viewing angle effects on satellite measurements of bidirectional reflectance , 1985 .

[26]  W. Qin,et al.  3-D Scene Modeling of Semidesert Vegetation Cover and its Radiation Regime , 2000 .

[27]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Eyal Ben-Dor,et al.  A spectral based recognition of the urban environment using the visible and near-infrared spectral region (0.4-1.1 µm). A case study over Tel-Aviv, Israel , 2001 .

[29]  Michael P. Prisloe,et al.  Development of a geospatial model to quantify, describe and map urban growth , 2003 .

[30]  M. Schlerf,et al.  Remote sensing of forest biophysical variables using HyMap imaging spectrometer data , 2005 .

[31]  C. Small High spatial resolution spectral mixture analysis of urban reflectance , 2003 .

[32]  John R. Miller,et al.  Four-scale linear model for anisotropic reflectance (FLAIR) for plant canopies. II. validation and inversion with CASI POLDER, and PARABOLA data at BOREAS , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  J. Ross The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands , 1981, Tasks for vegetation sciences 3.

[34]  R. Richter,et al.  Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imaging spectrometry data. Part 2: Atmospheric/topographic correction , 2002 .

[35]  Albert Rango,et al.  Improved semi-arid community type differentiation with the NOAA AVHRR via exploitation of the directional signal , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[36]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Three-dimensional forest light interaction model using a Monte Carlo method , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[37]  A. Strahler,et al.  Geometric-Optical Bidirectional Reflectance Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.