Use of bank of Kalman estimators for damage detection of buildings

Serious damaged structures can result in catastrophic disasters during earthquakes. However, visual inspection of damage in structures by human is an inefficient and unreliable approach. Alternatively, a more scientific approach should be exploited to rapidly and accurately localize damage of structures. In this study, two damage detection methods based on prediction errors using a bank of Kalman estimators are presented and compared including a) a centralized approach and b) a decentralized approach. In the centralized approach, a representative model of a building is first derived from a frequency-domain system identification method under ambient vibration prior to earthquake events. This model is then converted into a bank of Kalman estimators, and the estimation errors can be calculated and then turned into statistics. The damage location, level, and time of occurrence can be statistically determined and presented by the damage indices. Similarly, in the decentralized approach, the same system identification method is first applied to structural responses. To be more realistic, the monitoring system is decentralized into subsystems with some overlapped sensor measurements. Banks of Kalman estimators can be constructed using the subsystems. By normalizing the damage probability indices from prediction errors of each bank, the damage location, level, and time of occurrence can be identified. A numerical example is given to demonstrate the two damage detection methods. Moreover, the two methods are compared by a scaled twintower building using shake table testing. The results indicate that both methods are quite effective for seismic damage detection.

[1]  D. P. Kothari,et al.  Simulation of Sensor Fault Diagnosis for Wind Turbine Generators DFIG and PMSM Using Kalman Filter , 2014 .

[2]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Damage Detection of Hysteretic Structures with a Pinching Effect , 2014 .

[3]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  Digital control of dynamic systems , 1980 .

[4]  Walter C. Merrill,et al.  Advanced detection, isolation and accommodation of sensor failures: Real-time evaluation , 1988 .

[5]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Variance estimation of modal parameters from output-only and input/output subspace-based system identification , 2016 .

[6]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Decentralized damage detection of seismically-excited buildings using multiple banks of Kalman estimators , 2018, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[7]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Frequency Domain Identification of Multi-Input, Multi-Output Systems Considering Physical Relationships between Measured Variables , 2005 .

[8]  M. Feldman,et al.  Damage Diagnosis of Rotors: Application of Hilbert Transform and Multihypothesis Testing , 1999 .

[9]  Sung-Han Sim,et al.  Decentralized System Identification Using Stochastic Subspace Identification for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2015, Sensors.

[10]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Embedding damage detection algorithms in a wireless sensing unit for operational power efficiency , 2004 .

[11]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[12]  Abdullah Nor Rul Hasma,et al.  Bank of Kalman Filters for Fault Detection in Quadrotor MAV , 2015 .

[13]  S. Masri,et al.  Application of Neural Networks for Detection of Changes in Nonlinear Systems , 2000 .

[14]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Hierarchical PSD damage detection methods for smart sensor networks , 2008 .

[15]  Leiba Rodman,et al.  Algebraic Riccati equations , 1995 .

[16]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Damage Detection of Seismically Excited Buildings Based on Prediction Errors , 2018, Journal of Aerospace Engineering.

[17]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Hybrid system identification for high-performance structural control , 2013 .

[18]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures , 1993 .