Learning effects in the block design task: a stimulus parameter-based approach.

Learning effects were assessed for the block design (BD) task, on the basis of variation in 2 stimulus parameters: perceptual cohesiveness (PC) and set size uncertainty (U). Thirty-one nonclinical undergraduate students (19 female) each completed 3 designs for each of 4 varied sets of the stimulus parameters (high-PC/high-U, high-PC/low-U, low-PC/high-U, and low-PC/low-U), ordered randomly within a larger set of designs with mixed stimulus characteristics. Regression analyses revealed significant, although modest, learning effects in all conditions. Negative-logarithmic learning slopes (growth factors) were greatest for high-U/high-PC designs and smallest for low-U/low-PC designs. Comparison of these slopes with known Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.; D. Wechsler, 1997; and 4th ed.; D. Wechsler, 2008) BD subtest gain scores demonstrated that presenting novel test items matched on stimulus parameters in multiple administrations reduced learning effects compared with the repeated use of the same test items. The results suggest that repeated administration of novel test items of the BD subtest, matched for PC and U, would result in more accurate assessments of changes in examinees' abilities over time than would the use of the same items. Difficulties inherent in implementing this method are also discussed.

[1]  Ellen W. Rowe,et al.  A history of intelligence test interpretation. , 1997 .

[2]  J. Stiles,et al.  The influence of pattern type on children's block design performance , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[3]  Alan S. Kaufman,et al.  Essentials of WAIS -III Assessment , 1999 .

[4]  F. Royer,et al.  Stimulus parameters that produce age differences in block design performance. , 1984, Journal of clinical psychology.

[5]  Michael W. Levine,et al.  Fundamentals of sensation and perception , 1981 .

[6]  S. Palmer Goodness, Gestalt, groups, and Garner: Local symmetry subgroups as a theory of figural goodness. , 1991 .

[7]  S. Berent,et al.  Test-retest IQ changes of epilepsy patients: assessing the influence of practice effects. , 1981, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[8]  W. R. Garner Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[9]  R. Cowie,et al.  The perception of structure , 1997 .

[10]  H. T. Clark,et al.  Field Dependence and Strategy Use , 1988 .

[11]  I. Grant,et al.  Detecting significant change in neuropsychological test performance: A comparison of four models , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[12]  J. Kramer,et al.  Configural errors on WISC–III block design , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[13]  Analysis of problem solving strategies on the Kohs block design test , 1991 .

[14]  Maureen Dennis,et al.  Clinical Neuropsychology and Brain Function: Research, Measurement, and Practice , 1988 .

[15]  D. Rawlings,et al.  Test-retest practice effects and test score changes of the WAIS-R in recovering traumatically brain-injured survivors , 1992 .

[16]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[17]  P. Rozencwajg,et al.  Strategy development in a block design task , 2001 .

[18]  G. Iverson,et al.  Measuring Improvement or Decline on the WAIS–R in Inpatient Psychiatry , 2001, Psychological reports.

[19]  A. Benton,et al.  Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology , 1981 .

[20]  J. Sattler Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications , 2001 .

[21]  D. Catron Immediate Test-Retest Changes in WAIS Scores among College Males , 1978 .

[22]  Fred L. Royer,et al.  Effect of perceptual cohesiveness on pattern recoding in the block design task , 1977 .

[23]  M. Lezak Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[24]  E. Kaplan A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. , 1988 .

[25]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[26]  V. Hachinski,et al.  Neuropsychological improvement versus practice effect following unilateral carotid endarterectomy in patients without stroke. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[27]  D. Tulsky,et al.  WAIS-III WMS-III Technical manual , 1977 .

[28]  G. Bower,et al.  Stimulus variables in the Block Design Task. , 1982, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[29]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[30]  Joseph C. Miller,et al.  Relationship of Stimulus and Examinee Variables to Performance on Analogous Visual and Tactile Block Construction Tasks , 2008, Applied neuropsychology.

[31]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Snoddy (1926) Revisited: Time Scales of Motor Learning , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[32]  F. Royer Stimulus Variables in the Block Design Task: A Commentary on Schorr, Bower, and Kiernan. , 1984 .

[33]  Information processing in the Block Design Task. , 1977 .