Epidural anesthesia and post-operative analgesia for bilateral inguinal mesh hernioplasty: Comparison of equipotent doses of ropivacaine and bupivacaine

Objectives: Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide local anesthetic, which is structurally very similar to bupivacaine but produces less motor block and less cardiac and central nervous system toxicity. It is also about 40% less potent than bupivacaine. Our double blind study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of the equipotent doses of ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5% for epidural anesthesia and ropivacaine 0.2% and bupivacaine 0.125% for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing bilateral mesh hernioplasty. Methods: Sixty-one patients were randomized to receive 15 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine. Sensory and motor block characteristics were compared. Changes in heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and adverse effects were noted. For post-operative analgesia, 0.2% ropivacaine and 0.125% bupivacaine were given as continuous epidural infusion. Analgesia using VAS scores, motor block, volume of local anesthetic used and patient satisfaction was assessed. Results: There was no significant variation in the sensory block profile. A greater intensity of motor block was achieved with bupivacaine in the beginning but by 30 minutes the difference was not significant. Duration of motor block was similar in the two groups. Visual analog scale scores were similar in both groups during the post-operative period, with a similar motor block profile. No major side effects were noted in any group. Conclusion: The equipotent doses of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provided good quality epidural anesthesia and post-operative analgesia.

[1]  F. Guney,et al.  Bupivacaine and ropivacaine: comparative effects on nerve conduction block. , 2007, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[2]  M. Columb,et al.  Motor Blocking Minimum Local Anesthetic Concentrations of Bupivacaine, Levobupivacaine, and Ropivacaine in Labor , 2007, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[3]  N. Christelis,et al.  A comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl for elective caesarean section. , 2005, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[4]  S. Kampe,et al.  Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being* , 2004, Current medical research and opinion.

[5]  S. Hoka,et al.  [Postoperative analgesia using continuous lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine in comparison with bupivacaine]. , 2003, Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology.

[6]  S. Jaber,et al.  Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery: Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  J. Wildsmith,et al.  Developments in local anaesthetic drugs. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[8]  Anthony Rodgers,et al.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  G. Lyons,et al.  Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  Spencer S. Liu,et al.  Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[11]  E. Crosby,et al.  Comparison of epidural anaesthesia with ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% for Caesarean section , 1998, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[12]  J. Eisenach,et al.  Epidural Fentanyl Produces Labor Analgesia by a Spinal Mechanism , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[13]  M. Columb,et al.  Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes. , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[14]  J. Mcclure,et al.  Ropivacaine 0.75% for extradural anaesthesia in elective caesarean section: an open clinical and pharmacokinetic study in mother and neonate. , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  K.,et al.  Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  A. Sandler,et al.  A Double-Blind Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.5%, 0. 75%, 1.0% and Bupivacaine 0.5% Injected Epidurally in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy , 1997 .

[17]  D. Scott,et al.  Epidural Ropivacaine Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia After Major Lower Abdominal Surgery--A Dose Finding Study , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  F. Reynolds,et al.  Extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a double-blind comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5% bupivacaine. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  D. Zaric,et al.  The Effect of Continuous Lumbar Epidural Infusion of Ropivacaine (0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3%) and 0.25% Bupivacaine on Sensory and Motor Block in Volunteers: A Double-Blind Study , 1995, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[20]  G. Thompson,et al.  Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[21]  R. Stienstra The place of ropivacaine in anesthesia. , 2003, Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica.