Image de-noising of a metal matrix composite microstructure using Sure-let wavelet and weighted bilateral filter

Analysis of material microstructure images have been an important research topic. In fact, multiple pertinent information can be extracted from material texture images such as inclusions, fraction surfaces, heterogeneous components, crystallographic planes orientation, porosity and so on. Actually, this information depends from the amount of noise included in the image. Thus, it is very important to enhance methods exploited for image de-nosing in such cases. In fact, images issued from scanned electronic microscopy as well as computed tomography are used in multiple security applications such as baggage screening and in the encrypted domain, it used to protect privacy of outsourced data in cloud computing. In this paper, we propose a comparative study between two popular techniques used in image de-noising that are; Sure-let wavelet technique and weighted bilateral filtering. Our goal is to grasp the versatility of those methods in de-noising microstructure composite material images. Results of both outputs are well discussed. In our case, we found that sure-let wavelet de-noising gives better output results quantitatively and qualitatively.

[1]  Kunal N. Chaudhury,et al.  Image denoising using optimally weighted bilateral filters: A sure and fast approach , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[2]  Rajni,et al.  Image Denoising Techniques - An Overview , 2014 .

[3]  Michael Unser,et al.  Fast $O(1)$ Bilateral Filtering Using Trigonometric Range Kernels , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Hui Cheng,et al.  Bilateral Filtering-Based Optical Flow Estimation with Occlusion Detection , 2006, ECCV.

[5]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[6]  Michael Elad,et al.  On the origin of the bilateral filter and ways to improve it , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  K. Jayachandra Reddy Acceleration of Shiftable O (1) Algorithm for Bilateral Filtering and Non-local means , 2014 .

[8]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Bilateral Filtering: Theory and Applications: Series: Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision , 2009 .

[9]  K. Castleman,et al.  FISH image analysis , 1996 .

[10]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  SUSAN—A New Approach to Low Level Image Processing , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Jyotsna Patil,et al.  A Comparative Study of Image Denoising Techniques , 2013 .

[12]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Thierry Blu,et al.  A New SURE Approach to Image Denoising: Interscale Orthonormal Wavelet Thresholding , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Kunal N. Chaudhury,et al.  Acceleration of the Shiftable $\mbi{O}{(1)}$ Algorithm for Bilateral Filtering and Nonlocal Means , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Chandrika Kamath,et al.  Denoising through wavelet shrinkage: an empirical study , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[16]  Jyotsna Patil,et al.  A Comparative Study of Image DenoisingTechniques , 2013 .

[17]  Jaakko Astola,et al.  An Introduction to Nonlinear Image Processing , 1994 .

[18]  S. M. Steve SUSAN - a new approach to low level image processing , 1997 .

[19]  Fatih Porikli,et al.  Constant time O(1) bilateral filtering , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[20]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[21]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Bilateral Filtering: Theory and Applications , 2009, Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis..

[22]  Noël Bonnet,et al.  Some trends in microscope image processing. , 2004, Micron.

[23]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..