Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals : The case of scalar implicatures

The experimental literature on the pragmatic abilities of bilinguals is rather sparse. The only study investigating adult second language (L2) learners ( Slabakova, 2010 ) found an increase of pragmatic responses in that population relative to monolinguals. The results of studies on early bilingual children are unclear, some finding a significant increase in pragmatic responses in early bilingual children (preschoolers) relative to monolinguals ( Siegal et al., 2007 ), while another ( Antoniou and Katsos, 2017 ), testing school children, does not. We tested adult French L2 learners of English and Spanish (in their two languages) as well as French monolingual controls in Experiment 1 and Italian-Slovenian early bilingual children (in both languages) and Slovenian monolingual controls in Experiment 2. Our results were similar to those of Antoniou and Katsos (2017) in early bilingual children, but different from those of Siegal et al. (2007) . We found no pragmatic bias in adult L2 leaners relative to adult monolinguals.

[1]  N. Katsos,et al.  The effect of childhood multilingualism and bilectalism on implicature understanding , 2017, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[3]  Albert Costa,et al.  How does the bilingual experience sculpt the brain? , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Scalar Implicatures in Child Language: Give Children a Chance , 2012 .

[5]  F. Craik,et al.  Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  E. Bialystok.  Reshaping the mind: the benefits of bilingualism. , 2011, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[7]  Emmanuel Chemla,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures , 2011, J. Semant..

[8]  D. Bishop,et al.  Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature , 2011, Cognition.

[9]  D. Barner,et al.  Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference , 2011, Cognition.

[10]  E. Bialystok,et al.  Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. , 2010, Bilingualism.

[11]  Roumyana Slabakova.  Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition , 2010 .

[12]  Natalie M. Klein,et al.  “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment , 2010, Cognition.

[13]  Yuko Okumura,et al.  Bilingualism Accentuates Children's Conversational Understanding , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  Yi Ting Huang,et al.  Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  L. Surian,et al.  Bilingualism and conversational understanding in young children , 2009, Cognition.

[16]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[17]  I. Noveck,et al.  A Developmental Investigation of Processing Costs in Implicature Production , 2007 .

[18]  D. Oller,et al.  Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[19]  S. Crain,et al.  Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures , 2005 .

[20]  Lewis Bott,et al.  Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences , 2004 .

[21]  A. Feeney,et al.  The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[22]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Children's Computation of Implicatures , 2004 .

[23]  I. Noveck,et al.  Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study , 2003, Brain and Language.

[24]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2003, Cognition.

[25]  S. Crain,et al.  At the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface in Child Language , 2001 .

[26]  I. Noveck.  When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[27]  E. Bialystok.  Cognitive Complexity and Attentional Control in the Bilingual Mind , 1999 .

[28]  Jakob Cromdal,et al.  Childhood bilingualism and metalinguistic skills: Analysis and control in young Swedish–English bilinguals , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[29]  F. Genesee,et al.  Language differentiation in early bilingual development , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[30]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1989 .

[31]  E. Bialystok.  Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. , 1988 .

[32]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[33]  M. Braine,et al.  Development of comprehension of “or”: Evidence for a sequence of competencies☆ , 1981 .

[34]  Lewis Bott,et al.  Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures , 2012 .

[35]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Making Inferences: The Case of Scalar Implicature Processing , 2011, CogSci.

[36]  J. Hilbe.  Logistic Regression Models , 2009 .

[37]  D. Sperber,et al.  The Why and How of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘Scalar Inferences’ , 2007 .