Devices for Transcatheter Haemodynamic Support for Left Heart Failure

et al. 8 investigated the TandemHeart device in a randomised study against an IABP from August 2000 to December 2003 at a single site in Germany. The inclusion criteria were the presence of CS complicating AMI with the intention to revascularise the infarcted artery by PCI. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists were also recommended for thrombolysis in MI (TIMI) flow less than III or evidence of intracoronary thrombus after PCI. CS was defined by persistent systolic blood pressure <90mmHg or vasopressors required to maintain blood pressure >90mmHg, evidence of end-organ failure, evidence of elevated left ventricular filling pressure and cardiac index <2.1l/minute/m 2 . The exclusion criteria were age >75 years, mechanical complications of AMI, duration of CS >12 hours, right heart failure, sepsis, significant aortic regurgitation, severe cerebral damage, resuscitation >30 minutes, severe peripheral vascular disease and other diseases with reduced life expectancy; the exclusion criteria eliminated >50% of patients in CS in the study. The haemodynamic parameters measured were cardiac output, mean blood pressure, cardiac power index, mean pulmonary artery pressure, central venous pressure and heart rate. The metabolic parameters measured were standard base excess, serum lactate and pH. The study attempted to avoid limb ischaemia in smaller patients by recommending the use of 12Fr arterial cannulae instead of the usual 17Fr used in most patients, therefore limiting the flow from the system to 3l/minute compared with 4l/minute. The cannulae were removed using a surgical approach in the first eight patients and subsequent removal was manual using a compression system. Abstract Among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), those in cardiogenic shock have the highest mortality rate. Early revascularisation with primary percutaneous intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery has decreased the mortality rate of patients in cardiogenic shock, but it remains high. The conventional treatment of haemodynamic instability has been the use of the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP); however, the IABP may not give adequate support to patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Recent advances in percutaneous left ventricular assist devices, specifically the TandemHeart and Impella LP 2.5, have shown improved haemodynamic support compared with the IABP. This article provides an overview of the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices to treat patients presenting with cardiogenic shock after acute MI.

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. , 2009, European heart journal.

[2]  M. Rothman,et al.  A first‐in‐man study of the reitan catheter pump for circulatory support in patients undergoing high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  T. Myers,et al.  Techniques and Complications of TandemHeart Ventricular Assist Device Insertion During Cardiac Procedures , 2009, ASAIO journal.

[4]  Adnan Kastrati,et al.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Left ventricular unloading in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients is safe and feasible and provides acute and sustained left ventricular recovery. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  W. Cohn,et al.  The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge). , 2008, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[7]  G. Lamas,et al.  Focused Update of the ACC / AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2007 .

[8]  D. Burkhoff,et al.  A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. , 2006, American heart journal.

[9]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  J. Hochman,et al.  Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2005, JAMA.

[11]  M. Frigerio,et al.  Different applications for left ventricular mechanical support with the Impella Recover 100 microaxial blood pump. , 2005, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  G. Schuler,et al.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2003, European heart journal.

[13]  J. Maessen,et al.  Efficacy of a new intraaortic propeller pump vs the intraaortic balloon pump: an animal study. , 2003, Chest.

[14]  G. Schuler,et al.  Reversal of Cardiogenic Shock by Percutaneous Left Atrial-to-Femoral Arterial Bypass Assistance , 2001, Circulation.

[15]  V. Matos [Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry]. , 2001, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction : A report from the shock trial Registry , 2000 .

[17]  J. Sternby,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of a new percutaneous intra-aortic axial flow pump. , 2000, ASAIO journal.

[18]  H. S,et al.  Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2000 .