Devices for Transcatheter Haemodynamic Support for Left Heart Failure
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Serruys,et al. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. , 2009, European heart journal.
[2] M. Rothman,et al. A first‐in‐man study of the reitan catheter pump for circulatory support in patients undergoing high‐risk percutaneous coronary intervention , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[3] T. Myers,et al. Techniques and Complications of TandemHeart Ventricular Assist Device Insertion During Cardiac Procedures , 2009, ASAIO journal.
[4] Adnan Kastrati,et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] J. Tijssen,et al. Left ventricular unloading in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients is safe and feasible and provides acute and sustained left ventricular recovery. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] W. Cohn,et al. The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge). , 2008, Texas Heart Institute journal.
[7] G. Lamas,et al. Focused Update of the ACC / AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2007 .
[8] D. Burkhoff,et al. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. , 2006, American heart journal.
[9] J. Tijssen,et al. Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.
[10] J. Hochman,et al. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2005, JAMA.
[11] M. Frigerio,et al. Different applications for left ventricular mechanical support with the Impella Recover 100 microaxial blood pump. , 2005, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.
[12] G. Schuler,et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2003, European heart journal.
[13] J. Maessen,et al. Efficacy of a new intraaortic propeller pump vs the intraaortic balloon pump: an animal study. , 2003, Chest.
[14] G. Schuler,et al. Reversal of Cardiogenic Shock by Percutaneous Left Atrial-to-Femoral Arterial Bypass Assistance , 2001, Circulation.
[15] V. Matos. [Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry]. , 2001, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.
[16] A. Jacobs,et al. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction : A report from the shock trial Registry , 2000 .
[17] J. Sternby,et al. Hydrodynamic properties of a new percutaneous intra-aortic axial flow pump. , 2000, ASAIO journal.
[18] H. S,et al. Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2000 .