Analysis of lead placement optimization metrics in cardiac resynchronization therapy with computational modelling.

AIMS The efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is known to vary considerably with pacing location, however the most effective set of metrics by which to select the optimal pacing site is not yet well understood. Computational modelling offers a powerful methodology to comprehensively test the effect of pacing location in silico and investigate how to best optimize therapy using clinically available metrics for the individual patient. METHODS AND RESULTS Personalized computational models of cardiac electromechanics were used to perform an in silico left ventricle (LV) pacing site optimization study as part of biventricular CRT in three patient cases. Maps of response to therapy according to changes in total activation time (ΔTAT) and acute haemodynamic response (AHR) were generated and compared with preclinical metrics of electrical function, strain, stress, and mechanical work to assess their suitability for selecting the optimal pacing site. In all three patients, response to therapy was highly sensitive to pacing location, with laterobasal locations being optimal. ΔTAT and AHR were found to be correlated (ρ < -0.80), as were AHR and the preclinical activation time at the pacing site (ρ ≥ 0.73), however pacing in the last activated site did not result in the optimal response to therapy in all cases. CONCLUSION This computational modelling study supports pacing in laterobasal locations, optimizing pacing site by minimizing paced QRS duration and pacing in regions activated late at sinus rhythm. Results demonstrate information content is redundant using multiple preclinical metrics. Of significance, the correlation of AHR with ΔTAT indicates that minimization of QRSd is a promising metric for optimization of lead placement.

[1]  Catherine Klersy,et al.  Myocardial Infarction Does Not Preclude Electrical and Hemodynamic Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Dyssynchronous Canine Hearts , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[2]  M. Haissaguerre,et al.  Impact of Pacing Site on QRS Duration and Its Relationship to Hemodynamic Response in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Congestive Heart Failure , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  K. T. ten Tusscher,et al.  Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[4]  David Begley,et al.  Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  N. Westerhof,et al.  An artificial arterial system for pumping hearts. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  Lawrence Mitchell,et al.  Simulating Human Cardiac Electrophysiology on Clinical Time-Scales , 2011, Front. Physio..

[7]  M. Schalij,et al.  QRS Duration and Shortening to Predict Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with End‐Stage Heart Failure , 2004, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  J. Daubert,et al.  Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. , 2007, European heart journal.

[9]  A. McCulloch,et al.  Passive material properties of intact ventricular myocardium determined from a cylindrical model. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Nael F Osman,et al.  Three-Dimensional Mapping of Optimal Left Ventricular Pacing Site for Cardiac Resynchronization , 2007, Circulation.

[11]  Milton Packer,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Pablo Lamata,et al.  An accurate, fast and robust method to generate patient-specific cubic Hermite meshes , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  M. Ginks,et al.  Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Durrer,et al.  Total Excitation of the Isolated Human Heart , 1970, Circulation.

[15]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G. Plank,et al.  The relative role of patient physiology and device optimisation in cardiac resynchronisation therapy: A computational modelling study , 2016, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[17]  E Fleck,et al.  Effect of Resynchronization Therapy Stimulation Site on the Systolic Function of Heart Failure Patients , 2001, Circulation.

[18]  E. Alegrı́a,et al.  Left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Clinical follow‐up and predictors of failed lateral implant , 2008, European journal of heart failure.

[19]  Kevin Vernooy,et al.  Strategies to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2014, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[20]  G. Plank,et al.  Length-dependent tension in the failing heart and the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, Cardiovascular research.

[21]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Left Ventricular Lead Position and Clinical Outcome in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) Trial , 2011, Circulation.