Fluorescent Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis Isolates

ABSTRACT DNA from over 300 Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus anthracis isolates was analyzed by fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). B. thuringiensis and B. cereus isolates were from diverse sources and locations, including soil, clinical isolates and food products causing diarrheal and emetic outbreaks, and type strains from the American Type Culture Collection, and over 200 B. thuringiensis isolates representing 36 serovars or subspecies were from the U.S. Department of Agriculture collection. Twenty-four diverse B. anthracis isolates were also included. Phylogenetic analysis of AFLP data revealed extensive diversity within B. thuringiensis and B. cereus compared to the monomorphic nature of B. anthracis. All of the B. anthracis strains were more closely related to each other than to any other Bacillus isolate, while B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains populated the entire tree. Ten distinct branches were defined, with many branches containing both B. cereus and B. thuringiensis isolates. A single branch contained all the B. anthracis isolates plus an unusual B. thuringiensis isolate that is pathogenic in mice. In contrast, B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki (ATCC 33679) and other isolates used to prepare insecticides mapped distal to the B. anthracis isolates. The interspersion of B. cereus and B. thuringiensis isolates within the phylogenetic tree suggests that phenotypic traits used to distinguish between these two species do not reflect the genomic content of the different isolates and that horizontal gene transfer plays an important role in establishing the phenotype of each of these microbes. B. thuringiensis isolates of a particular subspecies tended to cluster together.

[1]  P. Jackson,et al.  Genetic comparison of Bacillus anthracis and its close relatives using amplified fragment length polymorphism and polymerase chain reaction analysis , 1999, Journal of applied microbiology.

[2]  A. Navon,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis insecticides in crop protection — reality and prospects , 2000 .

[3]  Jerome Hauer,et al.  Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  A. Kolstø,et al.  Fluorescent Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Norwegian Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis Soil Isolates , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  P. Laurent,et al.  Updating the H‐antigen classification of Bacillus thuringiensis , 1999, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[7]  Ya-Xin Li,et al.  Biological control: A guide to natural enemies in North America , 2003 .

[8]  M. Doyle,et al.  Foodborne bacterial pathogens , 1989 .

[9]  R. J. Gilbert,et al.  Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus species. , 1989 .

[10]  N. Crickmore,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis and Its Pesticidal Crystal Proteins , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[11]  AFLP fingerprinting and genotypic characterization of some serovars of Bacillus thuringiensis , 2000 .

[12]  A. Kolstø,et al.  Genetic Structure of Population of Bacillus cereus and B. thuringiensis Isolates Associated with Periodontitis and Other Human Infections , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  H. D. Burges Microbial control of pests and plant diseases 1970-1980 , 1981 .

[14]  L. Price,et al.  Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis Reveals Genetic Relationships within Bacillus anthracis , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Philip K. Russell,et al.  Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working Group on Civilian Biodefense. , 1999, JAMA.

[16]  L. Price,et al.  Molecular diversity in Bacillus anthracis , 1999, Journal of applied microbiology.

[17]  M Hugh-Jones,et al.  Molecular evolution and diversity in Bacillus anthracis as detected by amplified fragment length polymorphism markers , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  F. Priest Systematics and Ecology of Bacillus , 1993 .

[19]  P. Sneath Endospore-forming gram-positive rods and cocci, , 1986 .

[20]  Anne-Brit Kolstø,et al.  Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis—One Species on the Basis of Genetic Evidence , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  Nikos Kyrpides,et al.  Genome sequence of Bacillus cereus and comparative analysis with Bacillus anthracis , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[23]  T. Koehler Bacillus anthracis genetics and virulence gene regulation. , 2002, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[24]  F. Ramisse,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis serotype H34 isolated from human and insecticidal strains serotypes 3a3b and H14 can lead to death of immunocompetent mice after pulmonary infection. , 1999, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[25]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests. , 2000, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[26]  A. Kolstø,et al.  Genetic Diversity of Bacillus cereus/B. thuringiensis Isolates from Natural Sources , 1998, Current Microbiology.

[27]  F. Drobniewski,et al.  Bacillus cereus and related species , 1993, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[28]  R. Losick,et al.  Bacillus Subtilis and Other Gram-Positive Bacteria: Biochemistry, Physiology, and Molecular Genetics , 1993 .