The impact of mask design on EUV imaging

EUV exposure tools are the leading contenders for patterning critical layers at the 22nm technology node. Operating at the wavelength of 13.5nm, with modest projection optics numerical aperture (NA), EUV projectors allow less stringent image formation conditions. On the other hand, the imaging performance requirements will place high demands on the mechanical and optical properties of these imaging systems. A key characteristic of EUV projection optics is the application of a reflective mask, which consists of a reflective multilayer stack on which the IC layout is represented by the reflectivity discontinuities1. Several mask concepts can provide such characteristics, such as thick absorbers on top of a reflective multi-layer stack, masks with embedded absorbers, or absorber-free masks with patterns etched in a reflective multilayer. This report analyzes imaging performance and tradeoffs of such new mask designs. Various mask types and geometries are evaluated through imaging simulations. The applied mask models take into account the topographic nature of the mask structures, as well as the fundamental, vectorial characteristics of the EUV imaging process. Resulting EUV images are compared in terms of their process stability as well as their sensitivities to the EUV-specific effects, such as pattern shift and image tilt, driven by the reflective design of the exposure system and the mask topography. The simulations of images formed in EUV exposure tools are analyzed from the point of view of the EUV mask users. The fundamental requirements of EUV mask technologies are discussed. These investigations spotlight the tradeoffs of each mask concept and could serve as guidelines for EUV mask engineering.

[1]  Iwao Nishiyama,et al.  Influence of asymmetry of diffracted light on printability in EUV lithography , 2005, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Bruno M. La Fontaine,et al.  Rigorous EM simulation of the influence of the structure of mask patterns on EUVL imaging , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Vitaliy Domnenko,et al.  Analysis of EUVL mask effects under partially coherent illumination , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Katsura Otaki,et al.  Asymmetric Properties of the Aerial Image in Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography , 2000 .

[5]  Scott Daniel Hector,et al.  Design and method of fabricating phase-shift masks for extreme-ultraviolet lithography by partial etching into the EUV multilayer mirror , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Adam R. Pawloski,et al.  Simulation of fine structures and defects in EUV etched multilayer masks , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Akira Chiba,et al.  Pattern printability for off-axis incident light in EUV lithography , 2002, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Thomas Klimpel,et al.  EUV pattern shift compensation strategies , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Obert R. Wood,et al.  Architectural choices for EUV lithography masks: patterned absorbers and patterned reflectors , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Minoru Sugawara Assessment of pattern position shift for defocusing in EUV lithography , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Jan van Schoot,et al.  EUV simulation extension study for mask shadowing effect and its correction , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.