Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in mixed mode office buildings in southwestern area of Spain

Abstract The design of the mode of operation of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems in office buildings has become increasingly important in recent years. This is due mainly to their relationship, both with the comfort of their occupants and with energy efficiency. The adaptive thermal comfort theory addresses this problem by linking the indoor comfort temperature with the outside temperature. This idea represents a relaxation in the presence of strict set-point temperatures. This results in a greater tolerance of the indoor environment and thus, in a wider range of acceptability on the part of the occupants of the buildings. Nonetheless, and although previous studies have been carried out on naturally ventilated buildings, there are no standards or application guides for hybrid buildings. This study shows the applicability of the adaptive model to hybrid buildings. An adaptive model for hybrid buildings is proposed, valid for both the free-running and air-conditioned modes, based on a field study carried out in the southwestern region of Spain. A total of 4.243 responses in mixed mode buildings and a total of 891 in air-conditioned building were collected over the period of a year. The comfort temperature in hybrid buildings was observed at an average operative temperature of 23.6 °C. The results show the energy-saving potential of hybrid buildings, without foregoing the comfort of their occupants, and show that it would be possible to implement a law that optimizes the operation of conditioning systems and which would undoubtedly lead to greater energy efficiency in such buildings.

[1]  Paul Gerard Tuohy,et al.  Twenty first century standards for thermal comfort: fostering low carbon building design and operation , 2010 .

[2]  Sheikh Ahmad Zaki,et al.  Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in office buildings in Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Japan during hot and humid season , 2016 .

[3]  F. Nicol,et al.  Derivation of the adaptive equations for thermal comfort in free-running buildings in European standard EN15251 , 2010 .

[4]  Shinichi Tanabe,et al.  Workplace productivity and individual thermal satisfaction , 2015 .

[5]  Sigrid Reiter,et al.  AN ADAPTIVE THERMAL COMFORT MODEL FOR HOT HUMID SOUTH- EAST ASIA , 2012 .

[6]  B. Rudolf,et al.  World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated , 2006 .

[7]  Ricardo Forgiarini Rupp,et al.  Predicting thermal comfort in office buildings in a Brazilian temperate and humid climate , 2017 .

[8]  Yingxin Zhu,et al.  Evaluating thermal comfort in mixed-mode buildings: A field study in a subtropical climate , 2015 .

[9]  A. K. Mishra,et al.  Field studies on human thermal comfort — An overview , 2013 .

[10]  Hom B. Rijal,et al.  Towards an adaptive model for thermal comfort in Japanese offices , 2017 .

[11]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Extending the applicability of the adaptive comfort model to the control of air-conditioning systems , 2016 .

[12]  Francesco Martellotta,et al.  Thermal comfort in the climatic conditions of Southern Italy , 2004 .

[13]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[14]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  Field Studies of Indoor Thermal Comfort and the Progress of the Adaptive Approach , 2007 .

[15]  Hom B. Rijal,et al.  Understanding occupant behaviour: the use of controls in mixed-mode office buildings , 2009 .

[16]  Manuel Correia Guedes,et al.  Thermal comfort criteria and building design: Field work in Portugal , 2009 .

[17]  A. K. Mishra,et al.  An adaptive thermal comfort model for the tropical climatic regions of India (Köppen climate type A) , 2015 .

[18]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  Adaptive Thermal Comfort: Foundations and Analysis , 2015 .

[19]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Adaptive model of thermal comfort for offices in hot and humid climates of India , 2014 .

[20]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Thermal comfort in offices in summer: Findings from a field study under the ‘setsuden’ conditions in Tokyo, Japan , 2013 .

[21]  Max Paul Deuble,et al.  Is it hot in here or is it just me? Validating the post-occupancy evaluation , 2014 .

[22]  Robert O. Wright,et al.  The built environment , 2018 .

[23]  Tetsu Kubota,et al.  Development of an adaptive thermal comfort equation for naturally ventilated buildings in hot-humid climates using ASHRAE RP-884 database , 2013 .

[24]  A. K. Mishra,et al.  Thermal comfort in undergraduate laboratories — A field study in Kharagpur, India , 2014 .

[25]  Roberto Lamberts,et al.  A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment , 2015 .

[26]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[27]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Mixed-mode buildings: A double standard in occupants’ comfort expectations , 2012 .

[28]  S. Alvarez,et al.  Tightening the energy consumptions of buildings depending on their typology and on Climate Severity Indexes , 2013 .

[29]  Raja R. A. Issa,et al.  From simulation to monitoring: Evaluating the potential of mixed-mode ventilation (MMV) systems for integrating natural ventilation in office buildings through a comprehensive literature review , 2016 .

[30]  J. F. Nicol,et al.  Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe , 2002 .

[31]  José Sánchez Sánchez,et al.  Analysis of a PHDC (Passive and Hybrid Downdraft Cooling) Experimental Facility in Seville and its Applicability to the Madrid Climate , 2012 .

[32]  M. Hancock,et al.  Do people like to feel ‘neutral’?: Exploring the variation of the desired thermal sensation on the ASHRAE scale , 2007 .

[33]  Sanyogita Manu,et al.  Field studies of thermal comfort across multiple climate zones for the subcontinent: India Model for Adaptive Comfort (IMAC) , 2016 .