Mathematical knowledge is related to understanding stocks and flows: results from two nations

Stocks and flows (SF) are essential to every-day judgments: debt changes with rates of incomes and expenses, and body weight with calories consumed and energy expended. Research suggests that individuals with strong mathematical skills have a poor understanding of SF. However, past research used homogeneous participant samples and the relationship between mathematical knowledge and performance in SF tasks was not tested. In two studies involving different populations from China and the U.S.A, we find that individuals with better general mathematical knowledge tend to be more accurate in SF tasks. We find that most participants who make mistakes follow an erroneous correlation heuristic; however, we also find that the use of this heuristic is not related to mathematical knowledge. Our results open the door to new research questions, including the type of mathematical knowledge needed and the relationship of mathematical knowledge and cognitive processes that people need for solving SF tasks. Copyright © 2015 System Dynamics Society

[1]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Making Sense of Dynamic Systems: How Our Understanding of Stocks and Flows Depends on a Global Perspective , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Managing the Budget: Stock-Flow Reasoning and the CO2 Accumulation Problem , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  How analytic reasoning style and global thinking relate to understanding stocks and flows , 2015 .

[4]  Arunachalam Narayanan,et al.  Decision Making and Cognition in Multi‐Echelon Supply Chains: An Experimental Study , 2015 .

[5]  Navid Ghaffarzadegan,et al.  Does analytical thinking improve understanding of accumulation , 2015 .

[6]  Achla Marathe,et al.  Public and health professionals' misconceptions about the dynamics of body weight gain/loss. , 2014, System dynamics review.

[7]  Krista Casler,et al.  Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[9]  Cleotilde González,et al.  Why Do We Want to Delay Actions on Climate Change? Effects of Probability and Timing of Climate Consequences , 2012 .

[10]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Understanding stocks and flows through analogy , 2012 .

[11]  Cleotilde González,et al.  Effects of domain experience in the stock–flow failure , 2010 .

[12]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Does formal system dynamics training improve people's understanding of accumulation? , 2010 .

[13]  Cleotilde González,et al.  Why don ’ t well-educated adults understand accumulation ? A challenge to researchers , educators , and citizens , 2008 .

[14]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  The Illusion of Linearity: From Analysis to Improvement , 2007 .

[15]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Understanding the building blocks of dynamic systems , 2007 .

[16]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  The Illusion Of Linearity , 2007, Mathematics Education Library.

[17]  Koon Shing Frederick Leung Mathematics Education in East Asia and the West: Does Culture Matter? , 2006 .

[18]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Not Everything Is Proportional: Effects of Age and Problem Type on Propensities for Overgeneralization , 2005 .

[19]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Learning to Make Decisions in Dynamic Environments: Effects of Time Constraints and Cognitive Abilities , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Lianghuo Fan,et al.  How have Chinese students performed in mathematics? A perspective from large-scale international mathematics comparisons , 2004 .

[22]  John D. Sterman,et al.  All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist† , 2002 .

[23]  J. Sterman,et al.  Cloudy Skies: Assessing Public Understanding of Global Warming , 2002 .

[24]  Jon R. Star,et al.  Spurious Correlations in Mathematical Thinking , 2001 .

[25]  Dae-Dong Hahn,et al.  Mathematics instruction in korean primary schools : Structures, processes, and a linguistic analysis of questioning , 2001 .

[26]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory , 2000 .

[27]  A. Beaton Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years. IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). , 1996 .

[28]  J. Sterman,et al.  Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making , 1995 .

[29]  Mark Paich,et al.  Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets , 1993 .

[30]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Rational number, ratio and proportion , 1992 .

[31]  J. Sterman Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making , 1989 .

[32]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[33]  J. Stigler,et al.  Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. , 1986, Science.

[34]  L. Streefland,et al.  Young children (6–8)-ratio and proportion , 1979 .