Pollution control and technological advance: A dynamic model of the firm

Abstract The paper extends the static comparison of effluent taxes and effluent standards to a dynamic world in which firms invest resources in improving their abatement technology as well as their production technology. The analysis shows that the two pollution control policies lead to a distinctly different allocation of research and development (R & D) funds between improvement in abatement technology and improvement in production technology. The model also shows that a temporally constant effluent tax leads to an increasing effluent discharge rate for “typical” firms. Other results concern the pattern of output growth and the rate of technological advance.

[1]  V. Smith.  The implications of common property resources for technical change , 1972 .

[2]  Gerhard Tintner,et al.  Mathematical Analysis for Economists. , 1938 .

[3]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Technology And The Environment , 1971 .

[4]  R. D'arge,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1973 .

[5]  E. Keeler,et al.  The optimal control of pollution , 1972 .

[6]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution , 1964 .

[7]  Lloyd Orr,et al.  Incentive for Innovation as the Basis for Effluent Charge Strategy , 1976 .

[8]  C. Schultze,et al.  POLLUTION, PRICES, AND PUBLIC POLICY , 1977 .

[9]  Ralph D. Elliott,et al.  The effects of sewer surcharges on the level of industrial wastes and the use of water by industry , 1972 .

[10]  A M Freeman,et al.  Residuals charges for pollution control: a policy evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[11]  M. Kamien,et al.  Induced Factor Augmenting Technical Progress from a Microeconomic Viewpoint , 1969 .

[12]  W. Baumol.  On Taxation and the Control of Externalities , 1972 .

[13]  John C. Panzar,et al.  Economies of Scale in Multi-Output Production , 1977 .

[14]  Allen V. Kneese,et al.  Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions , 1968 .

[15]  C. G. Plourde,et al.  A Model of Waste Accumulation and Disposal , 1972 .

[16]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  OPTIMAL "INDUCED" TECHNICAL CHANGE' , 1968 .

[17]  D. Starrett,et al.  Measuring Returns to Scale in the Aggregate, and the Scale Effect of Public Goods , 1977 .

[18]  Paul A. Samuelson,et al.  A Theory of Induced Innovation along Kennedy-Weisacker Lines , 1965 .