New method and criteria for national assessments of threatened habitat types

Consistent information on threatened habitat types is needed for land use planning and for prioritizing conservation, management, and restoration actions. However, detailed background data for assessing extinction risks of habitat types exists only in few countries. We present a new, flexible procedure for assigning habitat types into Red List Categories similar to those used for species by the World Conservation Union (IUCN). The procedure allows variation in the character or scale of assessment units and it is applicable even with incomplete data. The assessment protocol consists of two primary criteria: the change in the quantity and the change in the quality of the habitat type. The criteria are analyzed by expert groups with a transparent and repeatable stepwise procedure. The quantitative and qualitative changes in habitat types over the last 50 years serve as a starting point for the assessment, and the status is adjusted by assessing sub-criteria that address earlier changes, predicted future change, and the overall commonness or rarity of the habitat type. We also report the main results of the first assessment of threatened habitat types in Finland, and illustrate the application of the criteria by two case studies.

[1]  J. Franklin Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  F. Essl,et al.  ROTE LISTE GEFÄHRDETER BIOTOPTYPEN ÖSTERREICHS , 2002 .

[3]  D. Wilcove,et al.  Assessing the Threat Status of Ecological Communities , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  T. Carter,et al.  Loss of palsa mires in Europe and biological consequences , 2004, Environmental Conservation.

[5]  J. Karr,et al.  Breeding Birds of Isolated Woodlots: Area and Habitat Relationships. , 1987, Ecology.

[6]  Philip C. Stouffer,et al.  Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  O. Eriksson,et al.  The influence of management history and habitat on plant species richness in a rural hemiboreal landscape, Sweden , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[9]  J. P. Mccarty Ecological Consequences of Recent Climate Change , 2001 .

[10]  J. Paal Rare and threatened plant communitiesof Estonia , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  L. Finér,et al.  Development of ground vegetation biomass and nutrient pools in a clear-cut disc-plowed boreal forest , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[12]  J. Laine,et al.  Vuosina 1930-1978 metsäojitetut suot: ojitusalueiden inventoinnin tuloksia. , 1986 .

[13]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[14]  J. Pykälä Cattle grazing increases plant species richness of most species trait groups in mesic semi-natural grasslands , 2005, Plant Ecology.

[15]  Eli Fremstad,et al.  Truete vegetasjonstyper i Norge , 2001 .

[16]  Herbert H. T. Prins,et al.  Species Conservation: The 1994 IUCN Red List categories discussed , 1999 .

[17]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[18]  E. Kaakinen,et al.  2 – Key to Finnish Mire Types , 1984 .

[19]  J. Balch,et al.  Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems , 2006, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[20]  Andrew Macintosh,et al.  Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act , 2006 .

[21]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Relative Effects of Habitat Loss and Fragmentation on Population Extinction , 1997 .

[22]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example , 2001 .

[23]  Tracey J. Regan,et al.  Capturing expert knowledge for threatened species assessments: a case study using NatureServe conservation status ranks , 2004 .

[24]  J. Rowe,et al.  Fire in the Boreal Forest , 1973, Quaternary Research.

[25]  James H. Brown Mammals on Mountaintops: Nonequilibrium Insular Biogeography , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[26]  S. Schneider,et al.  Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants , 2003, Nature.

[27]  A. Ssymank,et al.  Proposal on a criteria system for a National Red Data Book of Biotopes , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  Regina Lindborg,et al.  HISTORICAL LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY AFFECTS PRESENT PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY , 2004 .

[29]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  Expert Judgement in Cost Estimating: Modelling the Reasoning Process , 2001, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[30]  Jeffrey M. Klopatek,et al.  Fire in the Boreal Forest , 1994 .