Effect of the N501Y Mutation on Ligands Complexed with SARS-CoV-2 RBD: Insights on Potential Drug Candidates for COVID-19

Bioactive compounds against SARS-CoV-2 targets could be potential treatments for COVID-19. Inhibitors of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) on the viral spike protein can block its binding to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme type II (ACE2) receptor. This study presents ligands based on natural products and synthetic compounds, targeting multiple N501/Y501 RBDs, besides RBD-ACE2, over different regions. The selected compounds were evaluated by docking using consensus scoring, pharmacokinetics/toxicological analyses, and molecular dynamics. Additionally, N501/Y501 RBD-ACE2 interaction properties and RBD–ligand complexes were compared. We identified that coenzyme Q10, 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoylglycerol, and palmitone showed the greatest RBD interactions. Targeting specific residues (in particular, tyrosine) in the C-, N-terminal, and central RBD sites promoted more stable protein–ligand interactions than in the N-terminal region only. Our results indicate that the molecules had more energetically favorable interactions with residues from distinct RBD regions rather than only interacting with residues in the N-terminal site. Moreover, the compounds might better interact with mutated N501Y than N501 RBDs. These hits can be optimized to leads and investigated through QSAR models and biological assays to comprehend mechanisms better. Altogether, such strategies may anticipate antiviral strategies if or when future variants and other CoVs arise.

[1]  T. Mogensen,et al.  High-dose coenzyme Q10 therapy versus placebo in patients with post COVID-19 condition: a randomized, phase 2, crossover trial , 2022, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe.

[2]  Zezhong Tian,et al.  Coenzyme Q10 Attenuates Human Platelet Aggregation Induced by SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein via Reducing Oxidative Stress In Vitro , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[3]  G. Gao,et al.  Receptor binding and complex structures of human ACE2 to spike RBD from omicron and delta SARS-CoV-2 , 2022, Cell.

[4]  Guohui Li,et al.  Ceftazidime is a potential drug to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro by blocking spike protein–ACE2 interaction , 2021, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[5]  B. Autran,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 variants and ending the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, The Lancet.

[6]  P. Buchwald,et al.  Methylene Blue Inhibits the SARS-CoV-2 Spike–ACE2 Protein-Protein Interaction–a Mechanism that can Contribute to its Antiviral Activity Against COVID-19 , 2021, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[7]  Jiangfang Lian,et al.  Off-label use of chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and lopinavir/ritonavir in COVID-19 risks prolonging the QT interval by targeting the hERG channel , 2020, European Journal of Pharmacology.

[8]  A. Moursi,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy or combined with azithromycin in COVID-19 treatment , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Zhe-Sheng Chen,et al.  Repurposing FDA-approved drugs for SARS-CoV-2 through an ELISA-based screening for the inhibition of RBD/ACE2 interaction , 2020, Protein & Cell.

[10]  P. Shinn,et al.  Targeting ACE2–RBD Interaction as a Platform for COVID-19 Therapeutics: Development and Drug-Repurposing Screen of an AlphaLISA Proximity Assay , 2020, ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science.

[11]  Mukhtar Ahmed,et al.  Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): a Review , 2020, SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.

[12]  P. Buchwald,et al.  Small-Molecule In Vitro Inhibitors of the Coronavirus Spike – ACE2 Protein-Protein Interaction as Blockers of Viral Attachment and Entry for SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[13]  Jeffrey Shaman,et al.  Will SARS-CoV-2 become endemic? , 2020, Science.

[14]  I. Wilson,et al.  An Alternative Binding Mode of IGHV3-53 Antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain , 2020, Cell Reports.

[15]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19: an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials , 2020, medRxiv.

[16]  Oliver C. Grant,et al.  Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein glycan shield reveals implications for immune recognition , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Shuwen Liu,et al.  Structural and functional properties of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: potential antivirus drug development for COVID-19 , 2020, Acta Pharmacologica Sinica.

[18]  Maria Rita Gulotta,et al.  Targeting SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD Interface: a Supervised Computational Data‐Driven Approach to Identify Potential Modulators , 2020, ChemMedChem.

[19]  K. Bojang,et al.  Dexamethasone for COVID-19: data needed from randomised clinical trials in Africa , 2020, The Lancet Global Health.

[20]  M. Lester,et al.  The use of dexamethasone in the treatment of COVID-19 , 2020, Annals of Medicine and Surgery.

[21]  R. Pranata,et al.  Worrying situation regarding the use of dexamethasone for COVID-19 , 2020, Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease.

[22]  S. Fernando,et al.  Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib as a potential drug for COVID-19 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[23]  F. Gao,et al.  A noncompeting pair of human neutralizing antibodies block COVID-19 virus binding to its receptor ACE2 , 2020, Science.

[24]  Fang Li,et al.  Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Daniel Wrapp,et al.  Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike , 2020, Science.

[26]  T. Fletcher,et al.  Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID‐19 , 2020, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  Linqi Zhang,et al.  Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor , 2020, Nature.

[28]  E. Holmes,et al.  The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[29]  Kit-San Yuen,et al.  Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses , 2020, International journal of biological sciences.

[30]  Qiang Zhou,et al.  Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2 , 2020, Science.

[31]  Y. Hu,et al.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China , 2020, The Lancet.

[32]  G. Gao,et al.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Junmei Wang,et al.  End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design. , 2019, Chemical reviews.

[34]  C. Cavasotto,et al.  Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Gianni De Fabritiis,et al.  PathwayMap: Molecular Pathway Association with Self-Normalizing Neural Networks , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[36]  Yan Li,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 Update , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[37]  Cole H. Christie,et al.  Protein Data Bank: the single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[38]  Jie Li,et al.  admetSAR 2.0: web‐service for prediction and optimization of chemical ADMET properties , 2018, Bioinform..

[39]  Volkan Atalay,et al.  Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery: methods, tools and databases , 2018, Briefings Bioinform..

[40]  Andreas Bender,et al.  eMolTox: prediction of molecular toxicity with confidence , 2018, Bioinform..

[41]  Torsten Schwede,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Hongli Liu,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations and novel drug discovery , 2018, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[43]  James O. Lloyd-Smith,et al.  Pathways to zoonotic spillover , 2017, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[44]  Olivier Michielin,et al.  SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  PRODIGY: a web server for predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes , 2016, Bioinform..

[46]  Sanna P Niinivehmas,et al.  Case-specific performance of MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and SIE in virtual screening. , 2015, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[47]  Anna Vangone,et al.  Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein–protein complexes , 2015, eLife.

[48]  Michael Schroeder,et al.  PLIP: fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  Evgeny B. Krissinel,et al.  Crystal contacts as nature's docking solutions , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[50]  Thomas Stützle,et al.  Empirical Scoring Functions for Advanced Protein-Ligand Docking with PLANTS , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[51]  K. Henrick,et al.  Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  Michael Greger,et al.  The Human/Animal Interface: Emergence and Resurgence of Zoonotic Infectious Diseases , 2007, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[53]  Kim Henrick,et al.  Detection of Protein Assemblies in Crystals , 2005, CompLife.

[54]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.

[55]  D. E. Clark,et al.  Flexible docking using tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity , 1998, Proteins.

[56]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[57]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein–ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.