论文信息 - Critique of current human reliability analysis methods

Critique of current human reliability analysis methods

This paper is a critical review of human reliability analysis methods and techniques as applied in current probabilistic safety assessments of nuclear power plants. Practitioners continue to rely on concepts, data and methodologies that have seen relatively little change since the early 1970s, however. The generic human reliability data developed for the seminal 1975 Reactor Safety Study is still being used. Using the review insights, the paper develops recommendations for using plant-specific information from operator training and procedure validation in the human reliability analysis applications.

A. J. Spurgin | B.O.Y. Lydell

[1] L. H. Gray,et al. Criteria for safety-related operator actions , 1983 .

[2] A. D. Swain,et al. Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[3] Erik Hollnagel,et al. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method : CREAM , 1998 .

[4] B. Kirwan,et al. SLIM-MAUD: an approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment. Volume I. Overview of SLIM-MAUD , 1984 .

[5] D.C. Bley,et al. Quantification of human error rates using a SLIM-based approach , 1988, Conference Record for 1988 IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants,.

[6] A. D. Swain. Accident Sequence Evaluation Program: Human reliability analysis procedure , 1987 .

[7] J.C. Williams,et al. A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance , 1988, Conference Record for 1988 IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants,.

[8] Jens Rasmussen,et al. Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.