Toward clinical elastography of dermal tissues: A medical device to probe skin's elasticity through suction, with subsurface imaging via optical coherence tomography.

The mechanical behavior of dermal tissues is unarguably recognized for its diagnostic ability and in the last decades received a steadily increasing interest in dermatology practices. Among the various methods to investigate the mechanics of skin in clinical environments, suction-based ones are especially noteworthy, thanks to their qualities of minimal invasiveness and relative simplicity of setups and data analysis. In such experiments, structural visualization of the sample is highly desirable, both in its own right and because it enables elastography. The latter is a technique that combines the knowledge of an applied mechanical stimulus and the visualization of the induced deformation to result in a spatially resolved map of the mechanical properties, which is particularly important for an inhomogeneous and layered material such as skin. We present a device, designed for clinical trials in dermatology practices, that uses a handheld probe to (1) deliver a suction-based, controlled mechanical stimulus and (2) visualize the subsurface structure via optical coherence tomography. We also present a device-agnostic data-analysis framework, consisting of a Python library, released in the public domain. We show the working principle of the setup on a polymeric model and on a volunteer's skin.

[1]  Georges Limbert,et al.  How stiff is skin? , 2019, Experimental dermatology.

[2]  Hamed Joodaki,et al.  Skin mechanical properties and modeling: A review , 2018, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  E. Mazza,et al.  Location-specific mechanical response and morphology of facial soft tissues. , 2018, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[4]  Tanja Alderliesten,et al.  Visibility of fiducial markers used for image‐guided radiation therapy on optical coherence tomography for registration with CT: An esophageal phantom study , 2017, Medical physics.

[5]  Mariëlle E H Jaspers,et al.  In vivo polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography of human burn scars: birefringence quantification and correspondence with histologically determined collagen density , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  D. Iannuzzi,et al.  Multimodal probe for optical coherence tomography epidetection and micron-scale indentation , 2017 .

[7]  A. Malovini,et al.  Long‐term in vivo assessment of bioengineered skin substitutes: a clinical study , 2015, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[8]  Yuanyuan Wang,et al.  An OCT-based air suction-indentation probe for tissue elasticity measurement , 2014, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[9]  Martyn P Nash,et al.  Computational and experimental characterization of skin mechanics: identifying current challenges and future directions , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[10]  David T Corr,et al.  Biomechanics of Scar Tissue and Uninjured Skin. , 2013, Advances in wound care.

[11]  Michel Destrade,et al.  Characterization of the anisotropic mechanical properties of excised human skin. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[12]  M. Naghizadeh,et al.  Variation of Biophysical Parameters of the Skin with Age, Gender, and Body Region , 2012, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[13]  H. Hoeksema,et al.  Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools. , 2010, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[14]  H. Ryssel,et al.  Dermal substitution with Matriderm(®) in burns on the dorsum of the hand. , 2010, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[15]  D. D. de Bruin,et al.  Optical phantoms of varying geometry based on thin building blocks with controlled optical properties. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[16]  G Josse,et al.  A nonlinear elastic behavior to identify the mechanical parameters of human skin in vivo , 2008, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[17]  Cwj Cees Oomens,et al.  The relative contributions of different skin layers to the mechanical behavior of human skin in vivo using suction experiments. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  Gwendal Josse,et al.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of the skin using the suction test , 2006, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[19]  H. Ermert,et al.  Development and evaluation of a high-frequency ultrasound-based system for in vivo strain imaging of the skin , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  Influence of hydration and experimental length scale on the mechanical response of human skin in vivo, using optical coherence tomography , 2004, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[21]  P. V. van Zuijlen,et al.  Skin elasticity meter or subjective evaluation in scars: a reliability assessment. , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[22]  Cwj Cees Oomens,et al.  A numerical‐experimental method to characterize the non‐linear mechanical behaviour of human skin , 2003, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[23]  G. Jemec,et al.  Mechanical properties of the skin: A comparison between two suction cup methods , 2003, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[24]  Luis Rodrigues,et al.  EEMCO Guidance to the in vivo Assessment of Tensile Functional Properties of the Skin , 2001, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[25]  J. Lagarde,et al.  In vivo model of the mechanical properties of the human skin under suction , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[26]  F Patat,et al.  An in vivo method for measuring the mechanical properties of the skin using ultrasound. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  J. Cheng,et al.  The cutometer and ultrasonography in the assessment of postburn hypertrophic scar--a preliminary study. , 1997, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[28]  R. Guy Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin: Edited by J. Serup and G.B.E. Jemec, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995, 702 p., ISBN 0-8493-4453-0 , 1996 .

[29]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Age-related mechanical properties of human skin: an in vivo study. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[30]  Howard I. Maibach,et al.  Non invasive diagnostic techniques in clinical dermatology , 2014 .

[31]  V. T. Bartels,et al.  Handbook of medical textiles , 2011 .

[32]  Alexandre Delalleau,et al.  Characterization of the mechanical properties of skin by inverse analysis combined with the indentation test. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  S T Quek,et al.  Mechanical models for living cells--a review. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.