Responsiveness of Great Lakes Wetland Indicators to Human Disturbances at Multiple Spatial Scales: A Multi-Assemblage Assessment

ABSTRACT Developing indicators of ecosystem condition is a priority in the Great Lakes, but little is known about appropriate spatial scales to characterize disturbance or response for most indicators. We surveyed birds, fish, amphibians, aquatic macroinvertebrates, wetland vegetation, and diatoms at 276 coastal wetland locations throughout the U.S. Great Lakes coastal region during 2002–2004. We assessed the responsiveness of 66 candidate indicators to human disturbance (agriculture, urban development, and point source contaminants) characterized at multiple spatial scales (100, 500, 1,000, and 5,000 m buffers and whole watersheds) using classification and regression tree analysis (CART). Non-stressor covariables (lake, ecosection, watershed, and wetland area) accounted for a greater proportion of variance than disturbance variables. Row-crop agriculture and urban development, especially at larger spatial scales, were about equally influential and were more explanatory than a contaminant stress index (CSI). The CSI was an important predictor for diatom indicators only. Stephanodiscoid diatoms and nest-guarding fish were identified as two of the most promising indicators of row-crop agriculture, while Ambloplites rupestris (fish) and Aeshna (dragonflies) were two of the strongest indicators of urban development. Across all groups of taxa and spatial scales, fish indicators were most responsive to the combined influence of row-crop and urban development. Our results suggest it will be critical to account for the influence of potentially important non-stressor covariables before assessing the strength of indicator responses to disturbance. Moreover, identifying the appropriate scale to characterize disturbance will be necessary for many indicators, especially when urban development is the primary disturbance.

[1]  Carl Richards,et al.  Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems , 1997 .

[2]  Stephen D. Porter,et al.  Distribution of benthic algae in the upper Illinois River basin in relation to geology and land use , 2000 .

[3]  R. M. Goldstein,et al.  RELATION BETWEEN FISH COMMUNITIES AND RIPARIAN ZONE CONDITIONS AT TWO SPATIAL SCALES 1 , 2001 .

[4]  Michael C. Newman,et al.  Risk Assessment: Logic and Measurement , 1998 .

[5]  Richard M. Lehtinen,et al.  Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages , 1999, Wetlands.

[6]  David R. Barton,et al.  Dimensions of Riparian Buffer Strips Required to Maintain Trout Habitat in Southern Ontario Streams , 1985 .

[7]  R. King,et al.  Regional, watershed and local correlates of blue crab and bivalve abundances in subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2005 .

[8]  J. Walker,et al.  Indicators of Catchment Health , 1996 .

[9]  D. Uzarski,et al.  Validation and performance of an invertebrate index of biotic integrity for Lakes Huron and Michigan fringing wetlands during a period of lake level decline , 2004 .

[10]  P. Stolpman,et al.  Environmental Protection Agency , 2020, The Grants Register 2022.

[11]  A. Keast,et al.  Resource heterogeneity and fish species diversity in lakes , 1984 .

[12]  R. Sponseller,et al.  Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities , 2001 .

[13]  R. Regal,et al.  Consideration of Geography and Wetland Geomorphic Type in the Development of Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Bird Indicators , 2007, EcoHealth.

[14]  Steve L. Schleiger Use of an Index of Biotic Integrity to Detect Effects of Land Uses on Stream Fish Communities in West‐Central Georgia , 2000 .

[15]  William D. Sanville,et al.  Effects of agricultural activities and best management practices on water quality of seasonal prairie pothole wetlands , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[16]  John A. Young,et al.  Influences of upland and riparian land use patterns on stream biotic integrity , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  T. Danielson Methods for evaluating wetland condition # 1 Introduction to Wetland Biological Assessment , 2002 .

[18]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Using Multiple Taxonomic Groups to Index the Ecological Condition of Lakes , 2000 .

[19]  A. W. Johnson,et al.  Wetland and Stream Buffer Size Requirements-A Review. , 1994, Journal of environmental quality.

[20]  F. Fitzpatrick,et al.  EFFECTS OF MULTI‐SCALE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS ON AGRICULTURAL STREAM BIOTA IN EASTERN WISCONSIN 1 , 2001 .

[21]  D. Undersander,et al.  INFLUENCE OF INTENSIVE ROTATIONAL GRAZING ON BANK EROSION, FISH HABITAT QUALITY, AND FISH COMMUNITIES IN SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN TROUT STREAMS , 2000 .

[22]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  HABITAT, THE TEMPLET FOR ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES? , 1977 .

[23]  D. Whited,et al.  The importance of local and regional factors in predicting effective conservation Planning strategies for wetland bird communities in agricultural and urban landscapes , 2000 .

[24]  Leska S. Fore Response of Diatom Assemblages to Human Disturbance: Development and Testing of a Multimetric Index for the Mid-Atlantic Region (USA) , 2002 .

[25]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations , 2000 .

[26]  C. S. Holling Cross-Scale Morphology, Geometry, and Dynamics of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[27]  C. Townsend,et al.  Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems , 1994 .

[28]  M. Knutson,et al.  Effects of Landscape Composition and Wetland Fragmentation on Frog and Toad Abundance and Species Richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, U.S.A. , 1999 .

[29]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale , 1997 .

[30]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[31]  C. Johnston,et al.  Properties and performance of the Floristic Quality Index in Great Lakes coastal wetlands , 2006, Wetlands.

[32]  Marius Brouwer,et al.  Rationale for a New Generation of Indicators for Coastal Waters , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[33]  Richard M. Lehtinen,et al.  The Vegetation of Wet Meadows in Relation to Their Land-use , 2000 .

[34]  Carl Richards,et al.  Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota , 1996 .

[35]  J. Sedell,et al.  Diversity of Juvenile Anadromous Salmonid Assemblages in Coastal Oregon Basins with Different Levels of Timber Harvest , 1993 .

[36]  Nicholas P. Danz,et al.  Diatom-based Weighted-averaging Transfer Functions for Great Lakes Coastal Water Quality: Relationships to Watershed Characteristics , 2006 .

[37]  R. Hughes,et al.  A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity , 1998 .

[38]  Paul W. Seelbach,et al.  Reconciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities: lessons from Michigan trout streams , 1997 .

[39]  J. Gibbons,et al.  Terrestrial Buffer Zones and Wetland Conservation: A Case Study of Freshwater Turtles in a Carolina Bay , 1995 .

[40]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  The influence of scale and geography on relationships between stream community composition and landscape variables: description and prediction , 2003 .

[41]  Robert J. Steedman,et al.  Modification and Assessment of an Index of Biotic Integrity to Quantify Stream Quality in Southern Ontario , 1988 .

[42]  T. Simon Biological Response Signatures : Indicator Patterns Using Aquatic Communities , 2002 .

[43]  Barbara J. Benson,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of Littoral Fish Assemblages in Lakes: Relation to Species Diversity and Habitat Structure , 1992 .

[44]  D. Whited,et al.  Development of community metrics to evaluate recovery of Minnesota wetlands , 1998 .

[45]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Spatial Dependency of Vegetation–Environment Linkages in an Anthropogenically Influenced Wetland Ecosystem , 2004, Ecosystems.

[46]  G. Minshall Stream Ecosystem Theory: A Global Perspective , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[47]  J. J. Dinsmore,et al.  Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA , 2001, Wetlands.

[48]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Spatial scale and ecological relationships between the macroinvertebrate communities of stony habitats of streams and lakes , 2004 .

[49]  R. Axler,et al.  Turbidity Tolerances of Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Fishes , 2007 .

[50]  R. Stevenson Scale-Dependent Determinants and Consequences of Benthic Algal Heterogeneity , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[51]  J. Allan,et al.  The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales , 1997 .

[52]  JoAnn M. Hanowski,et al.  Evaluation of geographic, geomorphic and human influences on Great Lakes wetland indicators: A multi-assemblage approach , 2007 .

[53]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[54]  Susan M. Galatowitsch,et al.  Anthropogenic effects on the biodiversity of riparian wetlands of a northern temperate landscape , 1998 .

[55]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape PerspectiveLand use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamics , 1991 .

[56]  J. R. Maxwell,et al.  A hierarchical framework of aquatic ecological units in North America , 1995 .

[57]  J. D. Av I D A L L A N A N D L U C I N D,et al.  Catchment-scale analysis of aquatic ecosystems , 1997 .

[58]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Anthropogenic Correlates of Species Richness in Southeastern Ontario Wetlands , 1997 .

[59]  D. Strayer,et al.  Effects of Land Cover on Stream Ecosystems: Roles of Empirical Models and Scaling Issues , 2003, Ecosystems.

[60]  Rick J. Stoffels,et al.  Spatial scale and benthic community organisation in the littoral zones of large oligotrophic lakes: potential for cross‐scale interactions , 2005 .

[61]  J. Lyons,et al.  Fish and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Assemblages as Indicators of Stream Degradation in Urbanizing Watersheds , 2002 .

[62]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Application of Ecological Indicators , 2004 .

[63]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Fecundity determines the extinction threshold in a Canadian assemblage of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) , 2005, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[64]  John Lyons,et al.  Influences of Watershed Land Use on Habitat Quality and Biotic Integrity in Wisconsin Streams , 1997 .

[65]  B. Peterjohn,et al.  Proceedings of the marsh bird monitoring workshop , 1999 .

[66]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  The cumulative effect of wetlands on stream water quality and quantity. A landscape approach , 1990 .

[67]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[68]  Gerald J Niemi,et al.  Integrated Measures of Anthropogenic Stress in the U.S. Great Lakes Basin , 2007, Environmental management.

[69]  James R. Karr,et al.  Habitat Structure and Stream Fish Communities , 1978 .

[70]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[71]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Hierarchical Correlates of Bird Assemblage Structure on Northeastern U.S.A. Lakes , 2000 .

[72]  T. Hollenhorst,et al.  Use of GIS and remotely sensed data for a priori identification of reference areas for Great Lakes coastal ecosystems , 2005 .

[73]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Land Use Land Cover Change in the U.S. Great Lakes Basin 1992 to 2001 , 2006 .

[74]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Concordance of taxonomic composition patterns across multiple lake assemblages: effects of scale, body size, and land use , 1999 .

[75]  JoAnn M. Hanowski,et al.  Experimental Design Considerations for Establishing an Off-Road, Habitat-Specific Bird Monitoring Program Using Point Counts , 1995 .

[76]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Body size affects the spatial scale of habitat–beetle interactions , 2005 .

[77]  J. Brazner,et al.  Regional, watershed, and site-specific environmental influences on fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior tributaries , 2005 .

[78]  H. Pincus,et al.  Great Lakes Basin , 1963, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[79]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[80]  J. Roland,et al.  Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales , 1997, Nature.

[81]  R. Sharma,et al.  Empirical relationships between watershed characteristics and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) smolt abundance in 14 western Washington streams , 2001 .

[82]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Spatial partitioning of environmental correlates of avian biodiversity in the conterminous United States , 1996 .

[83]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Hierarchical, Multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[84]  M. Black,et al.  Hydrologic variability and the application of Index of Biotic Integrity metrics to wetlands: A great lakes evaluation , 2002, Wetlands.

[85]  R. Hughes,et al.  An Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) for Pacific Northwest Rivers , 2003 .

[86]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR LINKING WATERSHED LAND COVER TO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN STREAMS , 2005 .

[87]  John Lyons,et al.  Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, U.S.A. , 2003 .

[88]  J. Diamond Biological response signatures: indicator patterns using aquatic communities , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[89]  D. Mehlman,et al.  Avian Movements and Wetland Connectivity in Landscape Conservation , 1998 .

[90]  M. Cooper,et al.  Fish Habitat Use Within and Across Wetland Classes in Coastal Wetlands of the Five Great Lakes: Development of a Fish-based Index of Biotic Integrity , 2005 .

[91]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Determining the Spatial Scale of Species' Response to Habitat , 2004 .

[92]  J. Morgan,et al.  Problems in the Analysis of Survey Data, and a Proposal , 1963 .

[93]  Colin E. Studds,et al.  Influence of land use on the integrity of marsh bird communities of Chesapeake Bay, USA , 2004, Wetlands.

[94]  Chris O. Yoder,et al.  Using Biological Response Signatures within a Framework of Multiple Indicators to Assess and Diagnose Causes and Sources of Impairments to Aquatic Assemblages in Selected Ohio Rivers and Streams , 2002 .

[95]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[96]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Landscape Filters and Species Traits: Towards Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction in Stream Ecology , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[97]  D. P. Larsen,et al.  The Structure of Variation and Its Influence on the Estimation of Status: Indicators of Condition of Lakes in the Northeast, U.S.A. , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[98]  J. David Allan,et al.  Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[99]  H. Bart,et al.  Influence of agriculture on in-stream habitat and fish community structure in Piedmont watersheds of the Chattahoochee River System , 1999 .

[100]  I. Jonsen,et al.  Calopteryx Damselfly Dispersions Arising from Multiscale Responses to Landscape Structure , 2000 .

[101]  L. Johnson,et al.  Catchment and reach‐scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits , 1997 .

[102]  W. Davis,et al.  Developing Biological Indicators : Lessons Learned from Mid-Atlantic Streams , 2003 .

[103]  D. Albert,et al.  Plants as regional indicators of Great Lakes coastal wetland health , 2004 .

[104]  Orie L. Loucks,et al.  Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology : methods and applications , 2006 .

[105]  John L. Stoddard,et al.  The Relationship Between Stream Chemistry and Watershed Land Cover Data in the Mid-Atlantic Region, U.S. , 1998 .

[106]  R. Hughes,et al.  A Biointegrity Index (IBI) for Coldwater Streams of Western Oregon and Washington , 2004 .

[107]  J. David Allan,et al.  Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates , 1999, Environmental management.

[108]  H. Erickson,et al.  Species-Area Curves and Diversity-Productivity Relationships in Beaver Meadows of Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota, USA , 1996 .

[109]  S. Riffell,et al.  Birds in North American Great Lakes coastal wet meadows: is landscape context important? , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[110]  John Lyons,et al.  Impacts of Urban Land Cover on Trout Streams in Wisconsin and Minnesota , 2003 .

[111]  J. Bourdages,et al.  Response Time of Wetland Biodiversity to Road Construction on Adjacent Lands , 2000 .

[112]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[113]  Gerald J Niemi,et al.  Environmentally stratified sampling design for the development of Great Lakes environmental indicators , 2005, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[114]  H. LANGE-BERTALOT Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation , 1979 .

[115]  John Van Sickle,et al.  PROJECTING THE BIOLOGICAL CONDITION OF STREAMS UNDER ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS OF HUMAN LAND USE , 2004 .

[116]  Raymond D. Semlitsch,et al.  Biological Criteria for Buffer Zones around Wetlands and Riparian Habitats for Amphibians and Reptiles , 2003 .

[117]  T. Hollenhorst,et al.  SCALING ISSUES IN MAPPING RIPARIAN ZONES WITH REMOTE SENSING DATA: QUANTIFYING ERRORS AND SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY , 2006 .

[118]  J. Lyons,et al.  Impacts of Urbanization on Stream Habitat and Fish Across Multiple Spatial Scales , 2001, Environmental management.