Field Characterization of Humanitarian Demining for Future Robotic Assessment

Land mines are noisome and indiscriminate weapons that are simple to place, but difficult to remove. On the surface, robotics is ideally suited to the tedious, challenging, and dangerous removal task. However, prior attempts at robotic clearance, while promising in the laboratory, have had limited success in the field. The demining problem is particularly challenging due to the exceptional variety of the mines, the generally unstructured terrain, and the high (>1:100) false positive rate for mine detection. This paper reviews the types of terrain encountered in humanitarian demining and presents a design framework for robot tools that takes advantage of the presence of some clear initial terrain. The design separates operational units (e.g., main motors) from potentially replaceable units (e.g., sensing or tagging). This minimizes the amount of hardware in vulnerable areas and allows critical functional units to remain in protected spaces. By reducing the need for heavily shielding, the moving mass is lighter, which makes dynamic operations, such as multiple scans, easier.

[1]  J. P. Trevelyan A suspended device for humanitarian demining , 1996 .

[2]  J.-D. Nicoud,et al.  Robots for anti-personnel mine search , 1996 .

[3]  James Trevelyan Robots and landmines , 1997 .

[4]  Colin King,et al.  Jane's Mines and Mine Clearance , 1998 .

[5]  Y. Baudoin,et al.  Humanitarian demining and robotics , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.98CH36104).

[6]  Shigeo Hirose,et al.  Development of the quadruped walking robot, TITAN-IX — mechanical design concept and application for the humanitarian de-mining robot , 2001, Adv. Robotics.

[7]  Željko Ban,et al.  Demining robots - requirements and constraints , 2001 .

[8]  J. R. Lockwood,et al.  Alternatives for landmine detection , 2003 .

[9]  Shigeo Hirose,et al.  Proposal for automation of humanitarian demining with buggy robots , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[10]  Pablo González de Santos,et al.  SIL04: a true walking robot for the comparative study of walking machine techniques , 2003, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[11]  Chandrasekhar Kambhampati,et al.  The current opinion on the use of robots for landmine detection , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[12]  Shigeo Hirose,et al.  Robotic system for humanitarian demining , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[13]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  3D ground adaptive synthetic aperture radar for landmine detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Gichd A Study of Manual Mine Clearance , 2005 .

[15]  Michel Devy,et al.  Towards landmine detection using artificial vision , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  Shigeo Hirose,et al.  Development of Mine Hands: Extended Prodder for Protected Demining Operation , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[17]  Shigeo Hirose,et al.  A New Approach to Humanitarian Demining , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[18]  Surya P. N. Singh,et al.  Bias-tolerant terrain following method for a field deployed manipulator , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..