Operational tools to build a multicriteria territorial risk scale with multiple stakeholders

Evaluating and comparing the threats and vulnerabilities associated with territorial zones according to multiple criteria (industrial activity, population, etc.) can be a time-consuming task and often requires the participation of several stakeholders. Rather than a direct evaluation of these zones, building a risk assessment scale and using it in a formal procedure permits to automate the assessment and therefore to apply it in a repeated way and in large-scale contexts and, provided the chosen procedure and scale are accepted, to make it objective. One of the main difficulties of building such a formal evaluation procedure is to account for the multiple decision makers' preferences. The procedure used in this article, Electre Tri, uses the performances of each territorial zone on multiple criteria, together with preferential parameters from multiple decision makers, to qualitatively assess their associated risk level. We also present operational tools in order to implement such a procedure in practice, and show their use on a detailed example.

[1]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM I: The case of two categories (juin 2005) , 2005 .

[2]  C DiasLuis,et al.  Supporting groups in sorting decisions , 2007 .

[3]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating Utility Theory , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Kouichi Taji,et al.  Group decision support for hazards planning and emergency management: A Group Analytic Network Process (GANP) approach , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[5]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[6]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[7]  Thiago Tinoco Pires,et al.  A Decision-Aided Fire Risk Analysis , 2005 .

[8]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Use of multi-criteria decision-aids for risk zoning and management of large area subjected to mining-induced hazards , 2004 .

[9]  Vincent Mousseau,et al.  MCDA tools and Risk Analysis: the Decision Deck Project , 2011 .

[10]  H WittenIan,et al.  The WEKA data mining software , 2009 .

[11]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst , 2006 .

[13]  T. Aven Foundations of risk analysis , 2003 .

[14]  B. Roy Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision , 1985 .

[15]  Patrick Meyer,et al.  Eliciting Electre Tri category limits for a group of decision makers , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Vincent Mousseau,et al.  A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[17]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: More than two categories , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Raymond Bisdorff,et al.  The Decision Deck Project , 2009 .

[19]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  S French,et al.  Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding , 1996 .

[21]  M D Christou,et al.  The control of major accident hazards: the land-use planning issue. , 1999, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Vlasta Molak,et al.  Fundamentals of Risk Analysis and Risk Management , 1996 .

[23]  Patrick Meyer,et al.  Diviz: an MCDA workflow design, execution and sharing tool , 2010 .

[24]  P. Wakker Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity , 2010 .

[25]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[26]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[27]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Risk-maps informing land-use planning processes A survey on the Netherlands and the United Kingdom recent developments. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[29]  James T. Luxhoj,et al.  A Collaborative Multi‐criteria Decision Making Technique for Risk Factor Prioritization , 2007 .

[30]  Guangquan Zhang,et al.  Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system , 2009 .

[31]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[32]  C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,et al.  Extensible Markup Language (XML) , 1997, World Wide Web J..

[33]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  On computing ELECTRE's credibility indices under partial information , 1999 .

[34]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[35]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models , 2006, 4OR.

[36]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[37]  L. Dias,et al.  ELECTRE TRI for Groups with Imprecise Information on Parameter Values , 2000 .

[38]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A risk-informed decision framework for setting environmental windows for dredging projects. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[40]  V. Mousseau Using Assignment Examples to Infer Category Limits for the ELECTRE TRI Method , 2002 .

[41]  Finn Verner Jensen,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian Networks , 2008, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[42]  Vincent Mousseau,et al.  Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Model from Assignment Examples , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[43]  Eric van der Vlist,et al.  XML Schema , 2002 .

[44]  Nelson Rodrigues,et al.  Toward an integrative approach of the industrial risk management process in France , 2005 .

[45]  Charles H. Smith,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Support Software , 2005 .

[46]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[47]  José Rui Figueira,et al.  Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[48]  Mehdizadeh Rasool,et al.  Methodology and tools for risk evaluation in construction projects using Risk Breakdown Structure , 2012 .

[49]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[50]  Jason K. Levy,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management , 2005 .

[51]  Florent Joerin,et al.  Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[52]  T. Aven Misconceptions of Risk , 2010 .

[53]  C. Scawthorn A Brief History of Seismic Risk Assessment , 2006 .

[54]  Nozer D. Singpurwalla,et al.  Reliability and risk , 2006 .

[55]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..