Research prioritization using hypothesis maps

This work presents a method to aid in the prioritization of research within a scientific domain. The domain is encoded into a directed network in which nodes represent factors in the domain, and directed links between nodes represent known or hypothesized causal relationships between the factors. Each link is associated with a numeric weight that indicates the degree of understanding of that hypothesis. Increased understanding of hypotheses is represented by higher weights on links in the network. Research is prioritized by calculating optimal allocations of limited research resources across all links in the network that maximize the degree of overall knowledge of the research domain. We quantify the level of knowledge of individual nodes (factors) in the map by a network centrality measure that reflects in dependencies between knowledge level of nodes and the knowledge level of their parent nodes in the map. We analyzed a funded research proposal concerning the fate and transport of nanomaterials in the environment to illustrate the method.

[1]  Stella M. Marinakos,et al.  Cysteine-induced modifications of zero-valent silver nanomaterials: implications for particle surface chemistry, aggregation, dissolution, and silver speciation. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  R. Axelrod Structure of decision : the cognitive maps of political elites , 2015 .

[3]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. , 1989 .

[4]  Daniel McLinden,et al.  Concept maps as network data: analysis of a concept map using the methods of social network analysis. , 2013, Evaluation and program planning.

[5]  Gregory V Lowry,et al.  Effect of chloride on the dissolution rate of silver nanoparticles and toxicity to E. coli. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  C. Eden,et al.  The analysis of cause maps , 1992 .

[7]  Gregory V. Lowry,et al.  Chemical transformations during aging of zerovalent iron nanoparticles in the presence of common groundwater dissolved constituents. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Peter J. Vikesland,et al.  Controlled evaluation of silver nanoparticle dissolution using atomic force microscopy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Fumie Yokota,et al.  Value of Information Analysis in Environmental Health Risk Management Decisions: Past, Present, and Future , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Pedro J J Alvarez,et al.  Adsorbed polymer and NOM limits adhesion and toxicity of nano scale zerovalent iron to E. coli. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Gordon E. Brown,et al.  Sulfidation mechanism for zinc oxide nanoparticles and the effect of sulfidation on their solubility. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Application of stochastic multiattribute analysis to assessment of single walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Benjamin P Colman,et al.  Long-term transformation and fate of manufactured ag nanoparticles in a simulated large scale freshwater emergent wetland. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .

[15]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Toxicity Reduction of Polymer-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles by Sunlight , 2011 .

[16]  Naoki Orii,et al.  Research prioritization through prediction of future impact on biomedical science: a position paper on inference-analytics , 2013, GigaScience.

[17]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Science and technology roadmaps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[18]  K. Matyjaszewski,et al.  Microbial bioavailability of covalently bound polymer coatings on model engineered nanomaterials. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Peter J Vikesland,et al.  Effects of carboxylic acids on nC60 aggregate formation. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[20]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[21]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[22]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Modeling nanosilver transformations in freshwater sediments. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Stacy M. Wirth,et al.  Natural organic matter alters biofilm tolerance to silver nanoparticles and dissolved silver. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Tanapon Phenrat,et al.  Partial oxidation ("aging") and surface modification decrease the toxicity of nanosized zerovalent iron. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Hansruedi Siegrist,et al.  Behavior of metallic silver nanoparticles in a pilot wastewater treatment plant. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Stacey M. Louie,et al.  Effects of molecular weight distribution and chemical properties of natural organic matter on gold nanoparticle aggregation. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  W. Harvey Hegarty,et al.  Decision Makers' Beliefs About the Causes and Effects of Structure: An Exploratory Study , 1984 .

[28]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Meditations on the ubiquity and mutability of nano-sized materials in the environment. , 2011, ACS nano.

[29]  Peter J Vikesland,et al.  Effects of oxidation on the magnetization of nanoparticulate magnetite. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  A strategy for assessing science : behavioral and social research on aging , 2007 .

[31]  Gregory V Lowry,et al.  Sulfidation processes of PVP-coated silver nanoparticles in aqueous solution: impact on dissolution rate. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Michael F. Hochella,et al.  The structure and transformation of the nanomineral schwertmannite: a synthetic analog representative of field samples , 2014, Physics and Chemistry of Minerals.

[33]  Deborah J. Armstrong,et al.  Causal Mapping for Research in Information Technology , 2005 .

[34]  M. Bougon Cognition in Organizations: An Analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. , 1977 .

[35]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[36]  Jamie R Lead,et al.  Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[37]  Jérôme Labille,et al.  Aging of TiO(2) nanocomposites used in sunscreen. Dispersion and fate of the degradation products in aqueous environment. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[38]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Scientific management of science? , 2000 .

[39]  Anna M. Wise,et al.  Sulfidation of silver nanoparticles decreases Escherichia coli growth inhibition. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Lisa Truong,et al.  Sulfidation of silver nanoparticles: natural antidote to their toxicity. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Marie-Joëlle Rochet,et al.  Using cognitive maps to investigate fishers' ecosystem objectives and knowledge , 2008 .

[42]  Y. Kajikawa,et al.  Computer-assisted roadmapping: A case study in energy research , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[43]  Gregory V. Lowry,et al.  Reductive dissolution of arsenic-bearing ferrihydrite , 2010 .

[44]  M. Newman Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Kara Morgan,et al.  Development of a Preliminary Framework for Informing the Risk Analysis and Risk Management of Nanoparticles , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[46]  Armand Masion,et al.  Structural degradation at the surface of a TiO(2)-based nanomaterial used in cosmetics. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  M. Wiesner,et al.  Chemical stability of metallic nanoparticles: a parameter controlling their potential cellular toxicity in vitro. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[48]  Linsey C Marr,et al.  The role of atmospheric transformations in determining environmental impacts of carbonaceous nanoparticles. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[49]  J. Lead,et al.  Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  G. Lowry,et al.  Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: impact on stability and toxicity. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.