Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection

[1]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[2]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[3]  James K Min,et al.  Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Practical strategies for low radiation dose cardiac computed tomography. , 2010, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[5]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2010, Radiology.

[7]  N. Bellenger,et al.  A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography , 2010, Heart.

[8]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[9]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[10]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Dual Source CT Coronary Angiography in Severely Obese Patients: Trading Off Temporal Resolution and Image Noise , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[11]  R. Paden,et al.  Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  M. Reiser,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[13]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Radiation dose in cardiac CT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.

[15]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose , 2008, European Radiology.

[17]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[18]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Measurement of temporal resolution in dual source CT. , 2008, Medical physics.

[20]  Steen Z Abildstrom,et al.  64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, European heart journal.

[21]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Source Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[22]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[23]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. , 2007, Radiology.

[24]  R Proksa,et al.  Noise and resolution in images reconstructed with FBP and OSC algorithms for CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[25]  C. Herzog,et al.  CT of Coronary Artery Disease , 2007, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[26]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J. Remy,et al.  Low-dose ECG-gated 64-slices helical CT angiography of the chest: evaluation of image quality in 105 patients , 2006, European Radiology.

[28]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[29]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[30]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  Philip Costello,et al.  CT of coronary artery disease. , 2004, Radiology.

[32]  P. Judy,et al.  The noise power spectrum of CT images. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Robert Stanton,et al.  Radiological Imaging: The Theory of Image Formation, Detection, and Processing , 1983 .

[34]  R A Brooks,et al.  Theory of image reconstruction in computed tomography. , 1975, Radiology.

[35]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[36]  Thomas N. Hangartner,et al.  Computed Tomography , 2001 .