See you soon again, chatbot? A design taxonomy to characterize user-chatbot relationships with different time horizons

Abstract Users interact with chatbots for various purposes and motivations – and for different periods of time. However, since chatbots are considered social actors and given that time is an essential component of social interactions, the question arises as to how chatbots need to be designed depending on whether they aim to help individuals achieve short-, medium- or long-term goals. Following a taxonomy development approach, we compile 22 empirically and conceptually grounded design dimensions contingent on chatbots’ temporal profiles. Based upon the classification and analysis of 120 chatbots therein, we abstract three time-dependent chatbot design archetypes: Ad-hoc Supporters, Temporary Assistants, and Persistent Companions. While the taxonomy serves as a blueprint for chatbot researchers and designers developing and evaluating chatbots in general, our archetypes also offer practitioners and academics alike a shared understanding and naming convention to study and design chatbots with different temporal profiles.

[1]  Shwetak N. Patel,et al.  Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[2]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research , 2012 .

[3]  Elgar Fleisch,et al.  The Digital Pill: What Everyone Should Know about the Future of Our Healthcare System , 2021 .

[4]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[5]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  Chapter 5 – Is there a statistical difference between designs? , 2016 .

[6]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[7]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[8]  Alfred Benedikt Brendel,et al.  Towards a Taxonomy of Platforms for Conversational Agent Design , 2019, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[9]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[10]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  High Tech and High Touch , 2013 .

[11]  Shafiq R. Joty,et al.  Conversational Agents in Health Care: Scoping Review and Conceptual Analysis , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[13]  T. Kowatsch,et al.  Text-based Healthcare Chatbots Supporting Patient and Health Professional Teams: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Childhood Obesity , 2017 .

[14]  The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , 2018 .

[15]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Where is the Bot in our Team? Toward a Taxonomy of Design Option Combinations for Conversational Agents in Collaborative Work , 2019, HICSS.

[16]  Seunga Venus Jin,et al.  "In A.I. we trust?" The effects of parasocial interaction and technopian versus luddite ideological views on chatbot-based customer relationship management in the emerging "feeling economy" , 2021, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Adam S. Miner,et al.  Psychological, Relational, and Emotional Effects of Self-Disclosure After Conversations With a Chatbot , 2018, The Journal of communication.

[18]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Theory of Robot Communication: I. The Medium is the Communication Partner , 2018, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[20]  Amela Karahasanovic,et al.  Temporality of customer engagement in service innovation: a theoretical model , 2019, Handbook of Research on Customer Engagement.

[21]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication , 1995, J. Organ. Comput..

[22]  Sebastian Hobert,et al.  Small Talk Conversations and the Long-Term Use of Chatbots in Educational Settings - Experiences from a Field Study , 2019, CONVERSATIONS.

[23]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Design of emerging digital services: a taxonomy , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[26]  Jessica Hammer,et al.  Beyond Dyadic Interactions: Considering Chatbots as Community Members , 2019, CHI.

[27]  Patricia Alves-Oliveira,et al.  An extended framework for characterizing social robots , 2019, Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems.

[28]  Tibert Verhagen,et al.  Virtual Customer Service Agents: Using Social Presence and Personalization to Shape Online Service Encounters , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  H. Cooper.  Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews , 1988 .

[30]  Michael Hildebrandt,et al.  Time Design , 2004 .

[31]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  An overview of human interactive robots for psychological enrichment , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[32]  Yihyun Lim,et al.  Role-Based Design of Conversational Agents: Approach and Tools , 2020, HCI.

[33]  Alexander Maedche,et al.  Towards Designing Cooperative and Social Conversational Agents for Customer Service , 2017, ICIS.

[34]  Michael H. Breitner,et al.  More than FAQ! Chatbot Taxonomy for Business-to-Business Customer Services , 2020, CONVERSATIONS.

[35]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1988 .

[36]  Dennis Kundisch,et al.  Because Your Taxonomy is Worth IT: towards a Framework for Taxonomy Evaluation , 2019, ECIS.

[37]  Irwin Altman,et al.  A Transactional Approach to Interpersonal Relations: Physical Environment, Social Context and Temporal Qualities , 1992 .

[38]  J. Kandampully,et al.  Frontline Service Technology infusion: conceptual archetypes and future research directions , 2019, Journal of Service Management.

[39]  Tobias Kowatsch,et al.  The Impact of Interpersonal Closeness cues in Text-based Healthcare Chatbots on Attachment bond and the Desire to continue interacting: an Experimental Design , 2018, ECIS.

[40]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication , 2006, New Media Soc..

[41]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Exploring Design Principles for Enterprise Chatbots: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study , 2020, DESRIST.

[42]  Eun Go,et al.  Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Andreas Janson,et al.  Classifying Smart Personal Assistants: An Empirical Cluster Analysis , 2019, HICSS.

[44]  Theo Araujo,et al.  Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Steve Benford,et al.  From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences , 2009, CHI.

[46]  Andreas Janson,et al.  The What and How of Smart Personal Assistants: Principles and Application Domains for IS Research , 2018 .

[47]  Michael H. Breitner,et al.  Virtual Assistance in Any Context , 2020, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[48]  H. H. Kassarjian.  Content Analysis in Consumer Research , 1977 .

[49]  Eunju Ko,et al.  Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands , 2020 .

[50]  Jessica A. Chen,et al.  Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[51]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Chatbots as a new user interface for providing health information to young people , 2018 .