Evaluating the effectiveness of orientation indicators with an awareness of individual differences

Understanding how users perceive 3D geometric objects can provide a basis for creating more effective tools for visualization in applications such as CAD or medical imaging. This article examines how orientation indicators affect users' accuracy in perceiving the shape of a 3D object shown as multiple views. Multiple views force users to infer the orientation of an object and recognize corresponding features between distinct vantage points. These are difficult tasks, and not all users are able to carry them out accurately. We use a cognitive experimental paradigm to evaluate the effectiveness of two types of orientation indicators on a person's ability to compare views of objects presented in different orientations. The orientation indicators implemented were colocated, which shared a center-point with the 3D object, or noncolocated with (displaced from) the 3D object. The study accounts for additional factors including object complexity, axis of rotation, and users' individual differences in spatial abilities. Our results show that an orientation indicator helps users in comparing multiple views, and that the effect is influenced by the type of aid, a person's spatial ability, and the difficulty of the task. In addition to establishing an effect of an orientation indicator, this article helps demonstrate the application of a particular experimental paradigm and analysis, as well as the importance of considering individual differences when designing interface aids.

[1]  J. Pani Limits on the Comprehension of Rotational Motion: Mental Imagery of Rotations with Oblique Components , 1993, Perception.

[2]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .

[3]  Andrew C. Beall,et al.  Three dimensional spatial memory and learning in real and virtual environments , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[4]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Human factors in visualization research , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Maria Kozhevnikov,et al.  The new object‐spatial‐verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement , 2009 .

[7]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Real-Time Data Display, Spatial Visualization Ability, and Learning Force and Motion Concepts , 2006 .

[8]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Individual differences in virtual environments - Introduction and overview , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  L M Parsons,et al.  Visual discrimination of abstract mirror-reflected three-dimensional objects at many orientations , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al.  Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .

[12]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Chris North,et al.  Snap-Together Visualization: A User Interface for Coordinating Visualizations via Relational Schemata , 2003 .

[14]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Getting a Handle on Learning Anatomy with Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics , 2009 .

[15]  Andrew Walenstein,et al.  COGNITIVE SUPPORT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS: A DISTRIBUTED COGNITION FRAMEWORK , 2002 .

[16]  Keenan Crane,et al.  Multiscale 3D reference visualization , 2009, I3D '09.

[17]  David T. Gering,et al.  A system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and interventional MR , 1999 .

[18]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Effects of animation, user-controlled interactions, and multiple static views in understanding 3D structures , 2009, APGV '09.

[19]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Individual Differences Among Users: Implications for the Design of 3D Medical Visualizations , 2008 .

[20]  Timothy J. Newby,et al.  Using a Cross Section to Train Veterinary Students To Visualize Anatomical Structures in Three Dimensions. , 2002 .

[21]  S. Vijayakumar,et al.  Integration of MRI in evaluation and ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2008, 2008 Computers in Cardiology.

[22]  Mark H. Chignell,et al.  Individual Differences in Exploration Using Desktop VR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Örjan Smedby,et al.  Advanced 3D visualization in student-centred medical education , 2008, Medical teacher.

[24]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[27]  M A Just,et al.  Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: the curtate cycloid illusion. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Revising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers , 2002 .

[29]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[30]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[31]  D. R. Montello,et al.  The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .

[32]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[33]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Bootstrapped learning of novel objects. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[34]  Adam Finkelstein,et al.  Where do people draw lines? , 2008, ACM Trans. Graph..

[35]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes , 1998 .

[36]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization , 1990, SIGGRAPH.

[37]  S. Ullman The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[38]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[39]  Adam Finkelstein,et al.  Where do people draw lines , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[40]  D R Proffitt,et al.  The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[41]  Steven G. Parker,et al.  Enhancing interactive particle visualization with advanced shading models , 2006, APGV '06.

[42]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Reasoning With External Visualizations: What Matters Is What You See, Not Whether You Interact , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Melanie Tory Mental registration of 2D and 3D visualizations (an empirical study) , 2003, IEEE Visualization, 2003. VIS 2003..

[44]  William B. Thompson,et al.  Using mental rotation as a methodology to evaluate shape perception in computer graphics , 2008, APGV '08.

[45]  George W. Fitzmaurice,et al.  Safe 3D navigation , 2008, I3D '08.

[46]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  The Mental Rotation and Perceived Realism of Computer-Generated Three-Dimensional Images , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[47]  Eliot Feibush,et al.  Visualization for Situational Awareness , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[48]  Ian P Howard,et al.  The Contribution of Motion, the Visual Frame, and Visual Polarity to Sensations of Body Tilt , 1994, Perception.

[49]  Jennifer M. Shephard,et al.  Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Lisa B. Achille,et al.  Dual-Task Performance as a Function of Presentation Mode and Individual Differences in Verbal and Spatial Ability , 1992 .

[51]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Transformations of visuospatial images. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[52]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  An Integrated Visualization System for Surgical Planning and Guidance Using Image Fusion and Interventional Imaging , 1999, MICCAI.

[53]  Chuck Huff,et al.  Gender, software design, and occupational equity , 2002, SGCS.

[54]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Evaluating Visualizations: Do Expert Reviews Work? , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[55]  Colin Ware,et al.  Frames of reference in virtual object rotation , 2004, APGV '04.

[56]  Polina Golland,et al.  AnatomyBrowser: A Framework for Integration of Medical Information , 1998, MICCAI.

[57]  J R Pani,et al.  Spatial Reference Systems in the Comprehension of Rotational Motion , 1994, Perception.

[58]  DAVID KIRSH,et al.  Interactivity and multimedia interfaces , 1997 .

[59]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Integrated navigation and control software system for MRI-guided robotic prostate interventions , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[60]  Sven C. Mueller,et al.  Gender differences in spatial navigation in virtual space: implications when using virtual environments in instruction and assessment , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[61]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[62]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation: the state of the art. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[63]  R. Shepard,et al.  Comparison of cube rotations around axes inclined relative to the environment or to the cube. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking: Sex Differences in Visuospatial Abilities: More Than Meets the Eye , 2005 .

[65]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  3D object recognition with motion , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[66]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The gender factor performing visualization tasks on computer media , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[67]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities , 2005 .

[68]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. , 1985, Psychological review.

[69]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Virtual Histology of Transgenic Mouse Embryos for High-Throughput Phenotyping , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[70]  Maria Kozhevnikov,et al.  The Role of Immersivity in Three-Dimensional Mental Rotation , 2008 .

[71]  B. Laeng,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[72]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[73]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption , 2005, DATB.

[74]  N. Hata,et al.  An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[75]  Lutz Vollrath,et al.  Teaching and learning gross anatomy using modern electronic media based on the visible human project , 2003, Clinical anatomy.

[76]  Andreas Dünser,et al.  Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools , 2006, CHINZ '06.

[77]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[78]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[79]  William Winn,et al.  Learning in Artificial Environments: Embodiment, Embeddedness and Dynamic Adaptation , 2003 .

[80]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Unseen and Unaware: Implications of Recent Research on Failures of Visual Awareness for Human-Computer Interface Design , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[81]  M. Kozhevnikov,et al.  Perspective-Taking vs. Mental Rotation Transformations and How They Predict Spatial Navigation Performance. , 2006 .

[82]  M. Goodale,et al.  Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[83]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  User analysis in HCI - the historical lessons from individual differences research , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[84]  Kenichi Kanatani,et al.  Structure and motion from optical flow under perspective projection , 1987, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[85]  Fred Paas,et al.  Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory. , 2005, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[86]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  Querying and Creating Visualizations by Analogy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[87]  L. Cooper Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[88]  Amy L Shelton,et al.  Motion in the mind’s eye: Comparing mental and visual rotation , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[89]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Sex, Lies And Virtual Reality , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[90]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A High-End Virtual Reality Setup for the Study of Mental Rotations , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[91]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[92]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization , 2000, AVI '00.

[93]  M. Hegarty Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .

[94]  Igor Mordatch,et al.  ViewCube: a 3D orientation indicator and controller , 2008, I3D '08.

[95]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.

[96]  L. Parsons Inability to Reason About an Object's Orientation Using an Axis and Angle of Rotation , 1995 .

[97]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[98]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The Paleolithic Stone Age Effect? : Gender Differences Performing Specific Computer-Generated Spatial Tasks , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[99]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  VisTrails: enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[100]  Margaret M. Burnett,et al.  Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: are there gender issues? , 2005, CHI.

[101]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes , 1988, Cognition.

[102]  Bing Wu,et al.  The embodied actor in multiple frames of reference , 2012 .

[103]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[104]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[105]  A. D'Amico,et al.  MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. , 2001, Radiology.

[106]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[107]  I. Rock,et al.  Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[108]  Peter Khooshabeh,et al.  Computerized Representations of 3D Structure: How Spatial Comprehension and Patterns of Interactivity Differ among Learners , 2005, AAAI Spring Symposium: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance.

[109]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology , 1995 .

[110]  M. Tarr Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[111]  Amy L Shelton,et al.  Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[112]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[113]  Margaret M. Burnett,et al.  Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers' debugging , 2006, CHI.

[114]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[115]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Comparing ExoVis, Orientation Icon, and In-Place 3D Visualization Techniques , 2003, Graphics Interface.