Evaluating the effectiveness of orientation indicators with an awareness of individual differences
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ross T. Whitaker | William B. Thompson | Sarah H. Creem-Regehr | Tina R. Ziemek | R. Whitaker | W. Thompson | S. Creem-Regehr
[1] J. Pani. Limits on the Comprehension of Rotational Motion: Mental Imagery of Rotations with Oblique Components , 1993, Perception.
[2] M. Hegarty,et al. A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .
[3] Andrew C. Beall,et al. Three dimensional spatial memory and learning in real and virtual environments , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..
[4] Jiajie Zhang,et al. Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..
[5] Melanie Tory,et al. Human factors in visualization research , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[6] Maria Kozhevnikov,et al. The new object‐spatial‐verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement , 2009 .
[7] Ronald K. Thornton,et al. Real-Time Data Display, Spatial Visualization Ability, and Learning Force and Motion Concepts , 2006 .
[8] Mary Czerwinski,et al. Individual differences in virtual environments - Introduction and overview , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[9] G R Norman,et al. Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[10] L M Parsons,et al. Visual discrimination of abstract mirror-reflected three-dimensional objects at many orientations , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[11] Ruth B. Ekstrom,et al. Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests , 1976 .
[12] M. Hegarty,et al. A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[13] Chris North,et al. Snap-Together Visualization: A User Interface for Coordinating Visualizations via Relational Schemata , 2003 .
[14] M. Hegarty,et al. Getting a Handle on Learning Anatomy with Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics , 2009 .
[15] Andrew Walenstein,et al. COGNITIVE SUPPORT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TOOLS: A DISTRIBUTED COGNITION FRAMEWORK , 2002 .
[16] Keenan Crane,et al. Multiscale 3D reference visualization , 2009, I3D '09.
[17] David T. Gering,et al. A system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and interventional MR , 1999 .
[18] Melanie Tory,et al. Effects of animation, user-controlled interactions, and multiple static views in understanding 3D structures , 2009, APGV '09.
[19] Mary Hegarty,et al. Individual Differences Among Users: Implications for the Design of 3D Medical Visualizations , 2008 .
[20] Timothy J. Newby,et al. Using a Cross Section to Train Veterinary Students To Visualize Anatomical Structures in Three Dimensions. , 2002 .
[21] S. Vijayakumar,et al. Integration of MRI in evaluation and ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2008, 2008 Computers in Cardiology.
[22] Mark H. Chignell,et al. Individual Differences in Exploration Using Desktop VR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[23] Örjan Smedby,et al. Advanced 3D visualization in student-centred medical education , 2008, Medical teacher.
[24] Margaret Wilson,et al. Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[25] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] James D. Hollan,et al. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.
[27] M A Just,et al. Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: the curtate cycloid illusion. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] Mary Hegarty,et al. Revising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers , 2002 .
[29] M. Hegarty,et al. Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. , 2004, American journal of surgery.
[30] G. Norman,et al. How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.
[31] D. R. Montello,et al. The Role of Spatial Cognition in Medicine: Applications for Selecting and Training Professionals. , 2007 .
[32] Ben Shneiderman,et al. Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .
[33] Daniel Kersten,et al. Bootstrapped learning of novel objects. , 2003, Journal of vision.
[34] Adam Finkelstein,et al. Where do people draw lines? , 2008, ACM Trans. Graph..
[35] Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al. Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes , 1998 .
[36] Frederick P. Brooks,et al. Project GROPEHaptic displays for scientific visualization , 1990, SIGGRAPH.
[37] S. Ullman. The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[38] Mary Hegarty,et al. The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .
[39] Adam Finkelstein,et al. Where do people draw lines , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.
[40] D R Proffitt,et al. The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.
[41] Steven G. Parker,et al. Enhancing interactive particle visualization with advanced shading models , 2006, APGV '06.
[42] Daniel R. Montello,et al. Spatial Reasoning With External Visualizations: What Matters Is What You See, Not Whether You Interact , 2008, Cogn. Sci..
[43] Melanie Tory. Mental registration of 2D and 3D visualizations (an empirical study) , 2003, IEEE Visualization, 2003. VIS 2003..
[44] William B. Thompson,et al. Using mental rotation as a methodology to evaluate shape perception in computer graphics , 2008, APGV '08.
[45] George W. Fitzmaurice,et al. Safe 3D navigation , 2008, I3D '08.
[46] Woodrow Barfield,et al. The Mental Rotation and Perceived Realism of Computer-Generated Three-Dimensional Images , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[47] Eliot Feibush,et al. Visualization for Situational Awareness , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
[48] Ian P Howard,et al. The Contribution of Motion, the Visual Frame, and Visual Polarity to Sensations of Body Tilt , 1994, Perception.
[49] Jennifer M. Shephard,et al. Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[50] Lisa B. Achille,et al. Dual-Task Performance as a Function of Presentation Mode and Individual Differences in Verbal and Spatial Ability , 1992 .
[51] Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al. Transformations of visuospatial images. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.
[52] W. Eric L. Grimson,et al. An Integrated Visualization System for Surgical Planning and Guidance Using Image Fusion and Interventional Imaging , 1999, MICCAI.
[53] Chuck Huff,et al. Gender, software design, and occupational equity , 2002, SGCS.
[54] Melanie Tory,et al. Evaluating Visualizations: Do Expert Reviews Work? , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
[55] Colin Ware,et al. Frames of reference in virtual object rotation , 2004, APGV '04.
[56] Polina Golland,et al. AnatomyBrowser: A Framework for Integration of Medical Information , 1998, MICCAI.
[57] J R Pani,et al. Spatial Reference Systems in the Comprehension of Rotational Motion , 1994, Perception.
[58] DAVID KIRSH,et al. Interactivity and multimedia interfaces , 1997 .
[59] Gabor Fichtinger,et al. Integrated navigation and control software system for MRI-guided robotic prostate interventions , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..
[60] Sven C. Mueller,et al. Gender differences in spatial navigation in virtual space: implications when using virtual environments in instruction and assessment , 2006, Virtual Reality.
[61] Thomas Huk,et al. Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[62] Albert A. Rizzo,et al. Virtual reality and cognitive assessment and rehabilitation: the state of the art. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.
[63] R. Shepard,et al. Comparison of cube rotations around axes inclined relative to the environment or to the cube. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[64] Diane F. Halpern,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking: Sex Differences in Visuospatial Abilities: More Than Meets the Eye , 2005 .
[65] Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al. 3D object recognition with motion , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[66] Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al. The gender factor performing visualization tasks on computer media , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.
[67] M. Hegarty,et al. Individual Differences in Spatial Abilities , 2005 .
[68] M. Just,et al. Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. , 1985, Psychological review.
[69] M. Capecchi,et al. Virtual Histology of Transgenic Mouse Embryos for High-Throughput Phenotyping , 2006, PLoS genetics.
[70] Maria Kozhevnikov,et al. The Role of Immersivity in Three-Dimensional Mental Rotation , 2008 .
[71] B. Laeng,et al. A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.
[72] Colin Ware,et al. Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .
[73] Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al. Individual differences and usage behavior: revisiting a technology acceptance model assumption , 2005, DATB.
[74] N. Hata,et al. An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[75] Lutz Vollrath,et al. Teaching and learning gross anatomy using modern electronic media based on the visible human project , 2003, Clinical anatomy.
[76] Andreas Dünser,et al. Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools , 2006, CHINZ '06.
[77] Marilyn Tremaine,et al. Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..
[78] S. Vandenberg,et al. Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.
[79] William Winn,et al. Learning in Artificial Environments: Embodiment, Embeddedness and Dynamic Adaptation , 2003 .
[80] Daniel T. Levin,et al. Unseen and Unaware: Implications of Recent Research on Failures of Visual Awareness for Human-Computer Interface Design , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[81] M. Kozhevnikov,et al. Perspective-Taking vs. Mental Rotation Transformations and How They Predict Spatial Navigation Performance. , 2006 .
[82] M. Goodale,et al. Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[83] Andrew Dillon,et al. User analysis in HCI - the historical lessons from individual differences research , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[84] Kenichi Kanatani,et al. Structure and motion from optical flow under perspective projection , 1987, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..
[85] Fred Paas,et al. Design of interactive and dynamic anatomical visualizations: the implication of cognitive load theory. , 2005, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.
[86] Cláudio T. Silva,et al. Querying and Creating Visualizations by Analogy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[87] L. Cooper. Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[88] Amy L Shelton,et al. Motion in the mind’s eye: Comparing mental and visual rotation , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[89] A. Berthoz,et al. Sex, Lies And Virtual Reality , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[90] Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al. A High-End Virtual Reality Setup for the Study of Mental Rotations , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
[91] Donald P. Greenberg,et al. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.
[92] Allison Woodruff,et al. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization , 2000, AVI '00.
[93] M. Hegarty. Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .
[94] Igor Mordatch,et al. ViewCube: a 3D orientation indicator and controller , 2008, I3D '08.
[95] Desney S. Tan,et al. Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.
[96] L. Parsons. Inability to Reason About an Object's Orientation Using an Axis and Angle of Rotation , 1995 .
[97] Paul P. Maglio,et al. On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..
[98] Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al. The Paleolithic Stone Age Effect? : Gender Differences Performing Specific Computer-Generated Spatial Tasks , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..
[99] Cláudio T. Silva,et al. VisTrails: enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..
[100] Margaret M. Burnett,et al. Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: are there gender issues? , 2005, CHI.
[101] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes , 1988, Cognition.
[102] Bing Wu,et al. The embodied actor in multiple frames of reference , 2012 .
[103] R. Shepard,et al. Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.
[104] R W Cox,et al. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.
[105] A. D'Amico,et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. , 2001, Radiology.
[106] Barbara Tversky,et al. Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..
[107] I. Rock,et al. Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[108] Peter Khooshabeh,et al. Computerized Representations of 3D Structure: How Spatial Comprehension and Patterns of Interactivity Differ among Learners , 2005, AAAI Spring Symposium: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance.
[109] Roy D. Pea,et al. Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology , 1995 .
[110] M. Tarr. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[111] Amy L Shelton,et al. Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[112] H H Bülthoff,et al. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[113] Margaret M. Burnett,et al. Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers' debugging , 2006, CHI.
[114] Melanie Tory,et al. Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[115] Melanie Tory,et al. Comparing ExoVis, Orientation Icon, and In-Place 3D Visualization Techniques , 2003, Graphics Interface.