Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: development of the procedure, current clinical practice, and introduction of self-embedding as a new way of processing biopsy cores.

PURPOSE This study reviews the development of transrectal sonographically guided biopsy procedures of the prostate and optimization of the procedure in daily clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a literature review of the historic development and current practice of prostate biopsy procedures and present our systematic 12-core biopsy protocol. For processing the biopsy cores, we introduce the new technique of self-embedding. RESULTS The systematic biopsy protocols proposed in the literature can be summarized as sextant protocols, extended sextant protocols, 12-core protocols, extended 12-core protocols, and saturation biopsy protocols. The systematic 12-core prostate biopsy has become the new gold standard, replacing the classic sextant protocol. There is, however, little consensus about the biopsy procedure in the literature nor in daily practice. We propose a systematic biopsy protocol consisting of 12 cores in a fan-shaped arrangement that originates from the apex. Self-embedding of the biopsy cores is a simple new way of processing that provides additional information for the operating urologist (i.e., exact localization of the tumor and distance of the carcinoma from the capsule if a nerve-sparing procedure is planned). CONCLUSIONS A systematic 12-core prostate biopsy procedure should be used routinely. In large glands, it has proved to be useful to expand this protocol by taking additional cores. Self-embedding of the biopsy cores provides maximum information from the biopsy core distribution.

[1]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. , 1997, Urology.

[2]  D. Johnston,et al.  Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[3]  K. Shinohara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[4]  P. Walsh,et al.  Use of repeat sextant and transition zone biopsies for assessing extent of prostate cancer. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Amit Patel,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with office based saturation biopsy in a repeat biopsy population. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[6]  J. Watanabe,et al.  Effects of sextant transrectal prostate biopsy plus additional far lateral cores in improving cancer detection rates in men with large prostate glands , 2004, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[7]  Motonao Tanaka,et al.  [Diagnostic application of ultrasonotomography to the prostate]. , 1968, Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology.

[8]  T. Stamey,et al.  Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[9]  D. Johnston,et al.  A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[10]  I. Romics The technique of ultrasound guided prostate biopsy , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[11]  T. Stamey,et al.  Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies. , 1995, Urology.

[12]  C. Amling,et al.  Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[13]  J. Morote,et al.  Value of Routine Transition Zone Biopsies in Patients Undergoing Ultrasound-Guided Sextant Biopsies for the First Time , 1999, European Urology.

[14]  M. Terris Sensitivity and specificity of sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: preliminary report. , 1999, Urology.

[15]  T. Wheeler,et al.  Six additional systematic lateral cores enhance sextant biopsy prediction of pathological features at radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[16]  J. Melamed,et al.  Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[17]  D L McCullough,et al.  Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[18]  A. Jungwirth,et al.  One 10‐core prostate biopsy is superior to two sets of sextant prostate biopsies , 2003, BJU international.

[19]  M. Terris Prostate biopsy strategies: past, present, and future. , 2002, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[20]  J. M. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland: value of 12 versus 6 cores , 2003, Abdominal Imaging.

[21]  M. Terris,et al.  Comparison of mid-lobe versus lateral systematic sextant biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer. , 1997, Urologia internationalis.

[22]  Georg Bartsch,et al.  Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[23]  M. Blake,et al.  Predictors of prostate carcinoma: accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers. , 2001, Radiology.

[24]  C. Sehgal,et al.  Impact of Added Biopsy Areas on Prostate Cancer Detection , 2002, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study. , 1998, Urology.

[26]  Kazunori Kihara,et al.  Optimal sampling sites for repeat prostate biopsy: a recursive partitioning analysis of three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. , 2007, European urology.

[27]  M M Elhilali,et al.  Outcome of sextant biopsy according to gland volume. , 1997, Urology.

[28]  M. Remzi,et al.  When and How a Prostatic Re-Biopsy Should be Performed? , 2002 .

[29]  Increasing prostate biopsy cores based on volume vs the sextant biopsy: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study on cancer detection rates and morbidity , 2004 .

[30]  H. Miyake,et al.  Significance of routine transition zone biopsies in Japanese men undergoing transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate biopsies , 2005, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[31]  S. Egawa,et al.  Efficacy and morbidity of transrectal ultrasound‐guided 12‐core biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in Japanese men , 2005, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[32]  Y. Naya,et al.  Improved prostate cancer detection using systematic 14-core biopsy for large prostate glands with normal digital rectal examination findings. , 2006, Urology.

[33]  W. Catalona,et al.  Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. , 1994, The Journal of urology.

[34]  L. Bégin,et al.  Value of systematic transition zone biopsies in the early detection of prostate cancer. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[35]  R. Macchia EDITORIAL: BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE—AN ONGOING EVOLUTION , 2004 .

[36]  M. Brawer The Influence of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection , 2002 .

[37]  J. Patard,et al.  Use of Three Additional Mid Biopsies to Improve Local Assessment of Prostate Cancer in Patients with One Positive Sextant Biopsy , 1998, European Urology.

[38]  C. Foster,et al.  Effect of peripheral biopsies in maximising early prostate cancer detection in 8‐, 10‐ or 12‐core biopsy regimens , 2004, BJU international.

[39]  J. Gore,et al.  Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[40]  H. Ozen,et al.  Individualization of the biopsy protocol according to the prostate gland volume for prostate cancer detection. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[41]  Amit Patel,et al.  Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[42]  R W Veltri,et al.  Analysis of repeated biopsy results within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. , 2000, Urology.

[43]  M. Peyromaure,et al.  The Role of the Biopsy of the Transitonal Zone and of the Seminal Vesicles in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer , 2002 .

[44]  T. Stamey,et al.  Zonal Distribution of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Correlation with Histologic Pattern and Direction of Spread , 1988, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[45]  M. Terris,et al.  Routine transition zone and seminal vesicle biopsies in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies are not indicated. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[46]  K. Shinohara,et al.  The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[47]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[48]  H. Ozen,et al.  An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. , 2004, European urology.